The Same or Not the Same - On the Variety of Mechanisms of Path Dependence

Authors: Jürgen Beyer

Abstract:

In association with path dependence, researchers often talk of institutional “lock-in", thereby indicating that far-reaching path deviation or path departure are to be regarded as exceptional cases. This article submits the alleged general inclination for stability of path-dependent processes to a critical review. The different reasons for path dependence found in the literature indicate that different continuity-ensuring mechanisms are at work when people talk about path dependence (“increasing returns", complementarity, sequences etc.). As these mechanisms are susceptible to fundamental change in different ways and to different degrees, the path dependence concept alone is of only limited explanatory value. It is therefore indispensable to identify the underlying continuity-ensuring mechanism as well if a statement-s empirical value is to go beyond the trivial, always true “history matters".

Keywords: path dependence, increasing returns, historicalinstitutionalism, lock-in.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1333470

References:

[1] T. Guinnane,, W. Sundstrom, and Whatley, W. (eds.), History Matters: Essays on Economic Growth, Technology, and Demographic Change, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.
[2] J. Mahoney, "Path Dependence in Historical Sociology," Theory and Society, Vol.29, 2000, pp. 507-548.
[3] P. Pierson, "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics", American Political Science Review, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2000, pp. 251-267.
[4] J. Sydow, G. Schreyögg, and J. Koch, "Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34, 2009, to be published.
[5] J. Elster, "A Plea for Mechanisms," in: Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, P. Hedström and R. Swedberg, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 45-73.
[6] J. Mahoney, "Tentative Answers to Questions about Causal Mechanisms," Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, August 28th, 2003.
[7] R. Mayntz, "Mechanisms in the Analysis of Macro-Social Phenomena," MPIfG Working Paper 03/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, 2003.
[8] W.B. Arthur, "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock- In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Vol. 99, 1989, pp. 116-131.
[9] W.B. Arthur, Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.
[10] W.B. Arthur, "Increasing Returns and the New World of Business," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No. 4, 1996, pp. 100-109.
[11] P.A. David, "Clio and the Economics of QWERTY," American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No.2, 1985 pp.332-337.
[12] P.A. David, "Path Dependence, its Critics and the Quest for Historical Economics", Working Paper 00011 Department of Economics, Stanford University , 2000.
[13] S.J. Liebowitz and S.E. Margolis, "The Fable of the Keys," Journal of Law & Economics, Vol.33, 1990, pp.1-25.
[14] D. Foray, "The Dynamic Implications of Increasing Returns: Technological Change and Path Dependent Inefficiency," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 15, 1997, pp.733-752.
[15] R. Garud and P. Karnoe (eds.) Path Dependence and Creation, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
[16] P.A. David, "Understanding the Economics of QWERTY: The Necessity of History," in: Economic History and the Modern Economist, W.N. Parker, Ed., London: Basil Blackwell, 1986, pp.30-49.
[17] P.A. Hall and D. Soskice, D. "An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism," in: Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, P. Hall and D. Soskice, Eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp.1-68.
[18] K. Thelen, K. "Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics," Annual Review of Political Science, 1999, No.2, pp.369-404.
[19] J. Zysman, "How Institutions Create Historically Rooted Trajectories of Growth," Industrial Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No.1, 1994, pp. 243-283.
[20] P. Pierson, "Not Just What, but When: Timing and Sequence in Political Processes," Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 14, 2000, pp. 72-92.
[21] D. Rueschemeyer, and J.D. Stephens, "Comparing Historical Sequences: A Powerful Tool for Causal Analysis," Comparative Social Research, Vol. 17, 1997, pp. 55-72.
[22] K.J. Arrow, "Path Dependence and Competitive Equilibrium," in: History Matters. Essays on Economic Growth, Technology, and Demographic Change, T.W. Guinnane et al., Eds., Chicago: Stanford University Press, 2003.
[23] P.A. David, "The Landscape and the Machine: Technical Interrelatedness, Land Tenure and the Mechanization of the Corn Harvest in Victorian Britain," in: Essays on a Mature Economy, D.N. McCloskey, Ed., London: Methuen, 1971, pp. 145-205.
[24] D.C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[25] D.C. North, "Institutions and Credible Commitment," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 149, No.1, 1993, pp. 11- 23.
[26] J. Beyer and J. Wielgohs, "On the Limits of Path Dependency Approaches for Explaining Postsocialist Institution Building," East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 15, No.2, 2001, pp. 356-388.
[27] D.C. North, "Economic Performance Through Time," in: The New Institutionalism in Sociology, M.C. Brinton and V. Nee, Eds., Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998, pp. 247-257.
[28] J. Beckert, "What is Sociological about Economic Sociology? Uncertainty and the Embeddedness of Economic Action," Theory and Society, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1996, pp.803-840.
[29] I. Wallerstein, The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European-World Economy in the Sixteenth Century, New York: Academic Press, 1974.
[30] W.G. Roy, Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
[31] K. Orren, Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[32] J.A. Goldstone "The Problem of the Early Modern World," Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol.41, 1998, pp. 249-284.
[33] B. Moore, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Books, 1996.
[34] A. Gerschenkron Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.
[35] T. Skocpol, States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
[36] R.B. Collier and D. Collier, Shaping the Political Arena, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.
[37] T.L. Karl and P.C. Schmitter, "Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe," International Social Science Journal, Vol.43, 1991, pp. 269-284.
[38] T Ertman, Birth of the Leviathan, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[39] S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan "Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction," in: Party Systems and Voter Alignments, S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan, Eds., New York: Free Press, 1967, pp. 1-64.
[40] R.B. Collier, "Combining Alternative Perspectives: Internal Trajectories versus External Influences as Explanations of Latin American Politics in the 1940s," Comparative Politics, Vol.26, No.1, 1993, pp. 1-29.
[41] K. Thelen, "How Institutions Evolve. Insight from Comparative- Historical Analysis," in: Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp.208-240.
[42] P.J. DiMaggio and W.W. Powell "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields," in: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio, Eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp.41- 62.
[43] W.R. Scott and J.W. Meyer "The Rise of Training Programs in Firms and Agencies," in: Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism, W.R. Scott and J.W. Meyer, Eds., Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994, pp. 228-254.
[44] N. Fligstein, "The Structural Transformation of American Industry," in: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio, Eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991, pp. 311-336.
[45] M.L. Katz and C. Shapiro "Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities," Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, 1986, pp. 822-841.
[46] U. Witt, "ÔÇ×Lock-in" vs. ÔÇ×Critical Masses" - Industrial Change under Network Externalities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 15, 1997, pp. 753-773.
[47] M.A. Cusumano, Y. Mylonadis, and R.S. Rosenbloom, "Strategic Manoeuvring and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta," Business History Review, Vol. 6, 1992, pp. 51-94.
[48] G. Alexander, "Institutions, Path Dependence, and Democratic Consolidation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 13, No.3, 2001, pp. 249-270.
[49] J. Beyer, ÔÇÿBeyond the Gradualism-Big Bang Dichotomy - The Sequencing of Reforms and its Impact on GDP," in: Successful Transitions, J. Beyer, J. Wielgohs, and H. Wiesenthal, Eds., Baden- Baden: Nomos, 2001.
[50] P.L. Berger and T. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality, New York: Doubleday, 1966.