Graphic Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction for Maize Hybrid Yield Using Site Regression Stability Model
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32771
Graphic Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction for Maize Hybrid Yield Using Site Regression Stability Model

Authors: Saeed Safari Dolatabad, Rajab Choukan

Abstract:

Selection of maize (Zea mays) hybrids with wide adaptability across diverse farming environments is important, prior to recommending them to achieve a high rate of hybrid adoption. Grain yield of 14 maize hybrids, tested in a randomized completeblock design with four replicates across 22 environments in Iran, was analyzed using site regression (SREG) stability model. The biplot technique facilitates a visual evaluation of superior genotypes, which is useful for cultivar recommendation and mega-environment identification. The objectives of this study were (i) identification of suitable hybrids with both high mean performance and high stability (ii) to determine mega-environments for maize production in Iran. Biplot analysis identifies two mega-environments in this study. The first mega-environments included KRM, KSH, MGN, DZF A, KRJ, DRB, DZF B, SHZ B, and KHM, where G10 hybrid was the best performing hybrid. The second mega-environment included ESF B, ESF A, and SHZ A, where G4 hybrid was the best hybrid. According to the ideal-hybrid biplot, G10 hybrid was better than all other hybrids, followed by the G1 and G3 hybrids. These hybrids were identified as best hybrids that have high grain yield and high yield stability. GGE biplot analysis provided a framework for identifying the target testing locations that discriminates genotypes that are high yielding and stable.

Keywords: Zea mays L, GGE biplot, Multi-environment trials, Yield stability.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1333358

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1631

References:


[1] H.G. Gauch, R.W. Zobel, Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science 37, 311-326, 1997.
[2] M.S. Kang, Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. Advanced Agronomy 62, 199-252, 1998.
[3] M.S. Kang, Breeding: Genotype by Environment interaction. P. 218- 221, in RM Goodman Encyclopedia of plant and crop science, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2004.
[4] W. Yan, GGE biplot Windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal 93, 1111-1118, 2001.
[5] W. Yan, Singular value partitioning in biplot analysis of multievironment trial data. Agronomy Journal 94, 990-996, 2002.
[6] W. Yan, L.A. Hunt, Q. Sheng, and Z. Szlavnics, Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGEbiplot. Crop Science 40, 597-605, 2000.
[7] W. Yan, P.L. Cornelius, J. Crossa, and L.A. Hunt, Two Types of GGE Biplots for Analyzing Multi-Environment Trial Dat. Crop Science 41, 656-663, 2001.
[8] W. Yan, I. Rajcan, Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science 42, 11-20, 2002.
[9] W. Yan, M.S. Kang, GGE Biplot Analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, 2003.