Exploring the Application of Knowledge Management Factors in Esfahan University's Medical College

Authors: Alireza Shirvani, Shadi Ebrahimi Mehrabani

Abstract:

In this competitive age, one of the key tools of most successful organizations is knowledge management. Today some organizations measure their current knowledge and use it as an indicator for rating the organization on their reports. Noting that the universities and colleges of medical science have a great role in public health of societies, their access to newest scientific research and the establishment of organizational knowledge management systems is very important. In order to explore the Application of Knowledge Management Factors, a national study was undertaken. The main purpose of this study was to find the rate of the application of knowledge management factors and some ways to establish more application of knowledge management system in Esfahan University-s Medical College (EUMC). Esfahan is the second largest city after Tehran, the capital city of Iran, and the EUMC is the biggest medical college in Esfahan. To rate the application of knowledge management, this study uses a quantitative research methodology based on Probst, Raub and Romhardt model of knowledge management. A group of 267 faculty members and staff of the EUMC were asked via questionnaire. Finding showed that the rate of the application of knowledge management factors in EUMC have been lower than average. As a result, an interview with ten faculty members conducted to find the guidelines to establish more applications of knowledge management system in EUMC.

Keywords: Knowledge, knowledge management, knowledge management factors.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1333298

References:

[1] J. Darroch, "Developing a measure of knowledge management behaviors and practices", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.7 (5), pp. 41-54. 2003.
[2] A. Riege and N. Lindsay, "Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development", Journal of Knowledge Management, Brisbane, Vol. 10(3), pp. 24-39, 2006.
[3] D. A. Asoh, S. Belardo, and J. Crnkovic, "Assessing knowledge management: Refining and cross validating the knowledge management index using structural equation modeling techniques", International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 3(2), pp. 1-30, 2007.
[4] T. Davenport, and L. Prusak, Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA : Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
[5] D. Skyrme, Knowledge management: Making sense of an oxymoron,
[Online] http://www.skyrme.com/isights/22km.htm, 2003.
[6] A. Bennet, and D. Bennet, "Characterizing the next generation knowledge organization: Knowledge and innovation", Journal of the KMCI, Vol. 1, pp. 8-24, 2000.
[7] R. M. Grant, Managing industrial knowledge: Creation, transfer and utilization. London: Sage Publications, 2001.
[8] G. J. B. Probst, Practical knowledge management: A model that work. Managing Knowledge: Building Block for Success. s.l.: WILEY, pp. 17- 29, 1999.
[9] K. Wiig, People-focused knowledge management: How effective decision making leads to corporate success. Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann., 2004.
[10] K. Dalkir, Knowledge management in theory and practice. Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.
[11] A. HoseiniKhah, Knowledge management. Tehran : Yastroon, 2006.
[12] Abbas. Afraze, Knowledge management (Concepts, models, measuring and implementing), Tehran: Moalef, 2005.
[13] F. Adli, Knowledge management: Transaction to past knowledge. Tehran: Andishe, 2005.
[14] Ganesh D. Bhatt, "Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologeis, techniques, and people". Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5(1), pp. 68-75, 2001.