Investigation Corn and Soybean Intercropping Advantages in Competition with Redroot Pigweed and Jimsonweed

Authors: M. Rezvani, F. Zaefarian, M. Aghaalikhani, H. Rahimian Mashhadi, E. Zand

Abstract:

The spatial variation in plant species associated with intercropping is intended to reduce resource competition between species and increase yield potential. A field experiment was carried out on corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) intercropping in a replacement series experiment with weed contamination consist of: weed free, infestation of redroot pigweed, infestation of jimsonweed and simultaneous infestation of redroot pigweed and jimsonweed in Karaj, Iran during 2007 growing season. The experimental design was a randomized complete block in factorial experiment with replicated thrice. Significant (P≤0.05) differences were observed in yield in intercropping. Corn yield was higher in intercropping, but soybean yield was significantly reduced by corn when intercropped. However, total productivity and land use efficiency were high under the intercropping system even in contamination of either species of weeds. Aggressivity of corn relative to soybean revealed the greater competitive ability of corn than soybean. Land equivalent ratio (LER) more than 1 in all treatments attributed to intercropping advantages and was highest in 50: 50 (corn/soybean) in weed free. These findings suggest that intercropping corn and soybean increase total productivity per unit area and improve land use efficiency. Considering the experimental findings, corn-soybean intercropping (50:50) may be recommended for yield advantage, more efficient utilization of resources, and weed suppression as a biological control.

Keywords: Corn, soybean, intercropping, redroot pigweed, jimsonweed.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1333276

References:

[1] O. H Hauggaard-Nielsen, MK. Andersen, B. J├©rnsgaard, and E. S. Jensen, Density and relative frequency effects on competitive interactions and resource use in pea-barley intercrops. Field Crops Re. 2006, 95, 256-267.
[2] L. Marchiol, F. Miceli, M. Pinosa, G. Zerbi, Intercropping of soybean and corn for silage in northern Italy. Effect of nitrogen level and plant density on growth, yield, and protein content. Eur. J. Agron. 1992, 1, 207-211.
[3] K. Carruthers, F. Cloutier, D. L. Smith, Intercropping corn with soybean, lupin and forages: weed control by intercrops combined with interrow cultivation. Eur. j. of Agron. 1998, 8, 225-238.
[4] T. D. West, D. R. Griffith, Effect of strip intercropping corn and soybean on yield and profit. J. Prod. Agric. 1992, 5, 107-110.
[5] M. Ghaffarzadeh, F. G. Pre'chac, R. M. Cruse, Grain yield response of corn, soybean, and oat grown in a strip intercropping system. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 1994, 9, 171-177.
[6] P. K. Ghosh, A. K. Tripathi, K. K. Bandyopadhyay, M. C. Manna, Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirement in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. Europ. J. Agronomy. 2009, 31, 43-50.
[7] J. M. Watiki, S. Fukai, J. A. Banda, B. A. Keating, Radiation interception and growth of corn/cow pea intercrop as affected by corn plant density and cowpea cultivar. Field crops Res. 1993, 35, 123-133.
[8] G. Hayder, S. S. Mumtaz, A. Khan, S. Khan, Corn and soybean intercropping under various levels of soybean seed rates. Asian J. of Plant Sci. 2003, 2, 339-341.
[9] L. Li, J. Sun, F. Zhang, X. Li, S. Yang, Z. Rengel, Wheat/corn or wheat/soybean strip intercropping, I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Res. 2001, 71, 123-137.
[10] R. W. Willey, Intercropping-its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abst. 1979, 32, 1-10.
[11] M. Liebman, E. Dyck, Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol. Appl. 1993, 3, 92-122.
[12] T. R. Yellamanda, G. H. Sankara Reddi, Principles of agronomy. Second edition. Kalyani Publishers, 1995.
[13] M. Aasim, E. M. Umer, A. Karim Yield and Competition Indices of Intercropping Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Using Different Planting Patterns. Tarim Bilimleri dergisi. 2008, 14, 326-333.
[14] A. Miyda, K. Bhattacharjee, S. S. Ghose, P. Banik, Deferred seeding of blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) field on yield advantages and mothering of weeds. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2005, 191, 195-201.
[15] F. Ofori, W.R. Stern, Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Adv. Agron. 1987, 41, 41-90.