Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31824
Modeling “Web of Trust“ with Web 2.0

Authors: Omer Mahmood, Selvakennedy Selvadurai


“Web of Trust" is one of the recognized goals for Web 2.0. It aims to make it possible for the people to take responsibility for what they publish on the web, including organizations, businesses and individual users. These objectives, among others, drive most of the technologies and protocols recently standardized by the governing bodies. One of the great advantages of Web infrastructure is decentralization of publication. The primary motivation behind Web 2.0 is to assist the people to add contents for Collective Intelligence (CI) while providing mechanisms to link content with people for evaluations and accountability of information. Such structure of contents will interconnect users and contents so that users can use contents to find participants and vice versa. This paper proposes conceptual information storage and linking model, based on decentralized information structure, that links contents and people together. The model uses FOAF, Atom, RDF and RDFS and can be used as a blueprint to develop Web 2.0 applications for any e-domain. However, primary target for this paper is online trust evaluation domain. The proposed model targets to assist the individuals to establish “Web of Trust" in online trust domain.

Keywords: Web of Trust, Semantic Web, Electronic SocialNetworks, Information Management

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2056


[1] W3C (2006) "W3C in 7 Points". W3C. Retrieved from on 18 October 2006.
[2] W3C (2004) "RDF Specification" W3C. Retrieved from on 16th October 2006.
[3] W3C (2001). "Extensible Markup Language Specification". W3C. Retrieved from on 14 September 2006.
[4] W3C (2006). "XML Schema Specification". W3C. Retrieved from on 18 September 2006.
[5] W3C (2006) "RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema Specification". W3C. Retrieved from on 26 October 2006.
[6] Brickley, D. & Miller, L (2005) "FOAF Vocabulary Specification". W3C. Retrieved from on 16 September 2006.
[7] Berkman Center for Internet & Society (2005). "RSS 2.0 Specification". Harvard Law School Retrieved from on 18 September 2006.
[8] Nottingham, M & Sayre, R. (2005). "The Atom Syndication Format". Internet Society Taskforce (IEFT) RFC 4287 Retrieved from on 19 September 2006.
[9] Wikipedia (2005) "Blog Defined". Retrieved from on 14 September 2006.
[10] (2002) "What is Wiki". retrieved from on 2 August 2006.
[11] Gartner (2006) "Gartner Says Web 2.0 Offers Many Opportunities for Growth, But Few Enterprises Will Immediately Adopt All Aspects Necessary for Significant Business Impact", Retrieved from on 18th September 2006.
[12] Hinchcliffe, D (2006) "Thinking Beyond Web 2.0: Social Computing and the Internet Singularity". Web 2.0 Web Services Journal, Retrieved from _the_internet_sin.htm on 19th Sepetember 2006.
[13] Flake, G.W, (2006) "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Imminent Internet Singularity". Microsoft (24th January, 2006) Retrieved from /presentations/19_Flake_071706.ppt on 18th September 2006.
[14] Mahmood, O (2006). "Modelling Trust Recognition and Evaluation in Electronic Environment." International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations (IJNVO). Special Issue on "Trust for Virtual Organisations and Virtual Teams". Inderscience Publishers Ltd. ISSN (Online): 1741-5225, ISSN (Print): 1470-9503 (to be published).
[15] World information technology and services alliance (2000) "International survey of E-Commerce 2000" World information technology and services alliance (WISTA) Retrieved from on 26 August 2006.
[16] Kim, K. and Prabhakar, B., (2000) "Initial Trust, Perceived Risk, and the Adoption of Internet Banking". Proceedings of the Twenty First International Conference on Information Systems, December. PP: 537 - 543.
[17] Fullam K. and Barber K.S. (2004). "A Belief Revision Algorithm Based on information valuation". Laboratory for Intelligent Processes and Systems. Technical Report TR2003-UT-LIPS-021.
[18] Zacharia, G. (1999). "Trust management through reputation mechanisms". Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, pp. 163 - 167. Seattle. Retrieved August 1, 2006 from 1999/Zacharia.pdf
[19] Sarah P. W. S, Choon-Ling S, Kai H. L (2002), "A Preliminary Assessment of Different Trust Formation Models: The Effect of Third Party Endorsements on Online Shopping", Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-03).
[20] Mahmood, O (2006), "Initial Trust Evaluation and Comparison in Electronic Environment". Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference e-Commerce 2006, Barcelona, Spain, 9 - 11 December. ISBN: 972-8924-23-2 (In Press).
[21] The Internet Society (2005). "The Atom Syndication Format", Internet Official Protocol Standards, RFC 4287, December 2005. Retrieved from on 19 September 2006.
[22] ISO (2004). "ISO 8601 - 2004" ISO. Retrieved from http://www. 74 on 23 September 2006.
[23] Library of Congress (2006). "Codes for the Representation of Names of Languages". Library of Congress. Retrieved from on 23 September 2006.
[24] DCMI (2006). "DCMI Type Vocabulary" DCMI Retrieved from on 23 September 2006.
[25] British Standards Institute (BSI)(2005). "BSI Currency Code Service - ISO 4217 Maintenance Agency". BSI. Retrieved from http://www.bsiglobal. com/British_Standards/currency/index.xalter on 23 September 2006.
[26] IANA (2006). "MIME Media Types". IANA Retrieved from on 23 September 2006.
[27] Gpg4win (2006). GPG for Windows Utility, including WinPT. Retrieved from on 24 September 2006
[28] XmlNs (2002). "Web of Trust (WOT) Namespace", Retrieved from on 24 September 2006.