Organizational Commitment of Anadolu University Open Education Faculty Students

Authors: Emine Demiray, Şensu Curabay

Abstract:

Distance education program is a dimension of contemporary and new education technologies. Concepts and applications in this field are the results of a series of educational demands and developments in various communication and education technologies. Distance education applications have some conceptual bases. These are creating new education opportunities, realizing work-education unity, getting democratic in education, lifelong education, tendency to individual matters, effective use of institutions, integration of technology and education, tendency to individual and social needs, taking three dimensional integration as the main principle (publishing, printed materials and face to face education), reaching maximum mass, individual and mass education integrity and education demand and financial matters balance. Economics, Business Administration and Open Education faculties, which have been giving education within Anadolu University since 1982 in Turkey, are carrying on education with nearly 1.000.000 students. The aim of this study is to determine organizational commitment levels of students who have been studying at Anadolu University Economics, Business Administration and Open Education faculties in the scope of affective, continuance and nominative commitment in Allen&Meyer model. In the study, organizational commitment of the Economics, Business Administration and Open Education faculty students, who are receiving education by means of distance education, to their faculties is dealt after introducing Anadolu University Distance Education system which gives higher education via distance education method in Turkey. In order to increase the success level of faculties it is required for students to have high level of organizational commitment to their faculties. A questionnaire has been applied by using “Organizational Commitment Scale", developed by Meyer&Allen to determine organizational commitments of Economics, Business Administration and Open Education students. Organizational commitment is dealt with as affective, continuance and nominative commitment. The questionnaire was applied face to face to randomly chosen 500 students living in Eskişehir and the data was downloaded to the computer by using SPSS program and the results were analyzed in terms of demographic features (gender, age, marital status, years of study, work and income level) of students by using frequency test, ttest and ANOVA test. As a result of these analyses, when the comments of Open Education Faculty students on levels of affective, continuance and nominative commitment to their faculties were examined, it has been revealed that continuance commitment level has the highest rate. Among the female participants; continuance commitment is high in the age range of 30-40, for normative commitment it is 17-22. However no dominant age range was defined for affective commitment. Regarding the marital status; continuance commitment average is higher among married participants; but nominative affective commitment average is higher among single participants. As to the years of study, affective and continuance commitment is higher among senior students while normative commitment is higher among junior students. Moreover; in terms of continuance, affective and normative commitment, those who do not work and have low income have higher level of all there commitment types than those who work and have relatively high income.

Keywords: Open education, Organizational commitment, Distance education.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1332812

References:

[1] Ş. Curabay ve E. Demiray, 20. Kuruluş Yılında Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Sistemi ve Açıköğretim Fakültesi Eğitim Televizyonu (ETV), Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayınları; 721, Eskişehir, 2002, s:6.
[2] C. Alkan, “ Uzaktan Eğitimin Yapı ve İşleyiş Boyutu”, Uzaktan Eğitim, Uzaktan Eğitim Vakfı Yayını, S:2, Kış 1998, s:24.
[3] C. Tekin, U. Demiray ve M. Barkan, Türkiye’de Uygulanan Uzaktan Öğretim Sisteminde Video ile Eğitim Merkezi Proje Önerisi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Teknolojisi ve Yaygın Eğitim Vakfı Yayını, Eskişehir, 1987, s:28-29.
[4] A. Hakan ve Diğerleri, Açıköğretim Yayın Kataloğu, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, No:914, Eskişehir, 1996, s:1.
[5] (2008, April,17). Açıköğretim Sisteminin Tanıtımı. Available: http://www.anadolu.edu.tr
[6] M. Tuncer, (2008, June, 18). Eğitimci-Örgüt Nedir. Available: http://www.benimblog.com
[7] H. Gül, Örgütsel Bağlılık Yaklaşımlarının Mukayesesi ve Değerlendirmesi, Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 2, S: 1, 2002, s:37.
[8] N. Oliver, “Rewards, Investments, Alternatives and Organizational Commitment: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Development”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Cilt:63, S:1, 1990, s:10.
[9] T.Morris, H. Lydka ve F. O’Creavy, “Can Commitment Be Managed? A Longitudinal Analysis of Employee Commitment and Human Resource Policies”, Human Resource Management Journal, Cilt 3, S: 3, 1993, s:21-42.
[10] M.E. Sheldon, “Investments and Involvements as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to the Organization”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Cilt 16, 1971, s:143-150.
[11] R. Dubin, J.E. Champoux ve L.W. Porter “Central Life Interests and Organizational Commitment of Blue-Collar and Clerical Workers”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Cilt 20, 1975, s:411-421.
[12] L. Bayram, “Yönetimde Yeni Bir Paradigma: Örgütsel Bağlılık”, Sayıştay Dergisi, S:59, s:128.
[13] R. Balay, Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerde Örgütsel Bağlılık, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 2000, s:16.
[14] Y. Boylu, E. Pelit, E. Güçer, “Akademisyenlerin Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeyleri üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, Cilt:44, S:511, 2007, s:55-74.
[15] J.P. Meyer, N. J. Allen, “Organizational Commitment: Toward a ThreeComponent Model”, Research Bulletin, No:660, The Universty of Western Ontario, Department of Psychology, London, 1987, s:60.
[16] J.P. Meyer, L. Herscovitch, “Commitment in the Workplace Toward a General Model”, Human Resource Management Review, S:11, 2001, s:299-326.
[17] N.J. Allen, J.P. Meyer, “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affecitive, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, S:63,1990, s:1-18.
[18] R. Balay, Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerde Örgütsel Bağlılık, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 2000, s:72.
[19] Y. Boylu, E. Pelit, E. Güçer, “Akademisyenlerin Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeyleri üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, Cilt:44, S:511, 2007, s:55-74.
[20] N.J. Allen, J.P. Meyer, “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affecitive, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, S:63,1990, s:1-18.
[21] Y. Boylu, E. Pelit, E. Güçer, “Akademisyenlerin Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeyleri üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, Cilt:44, S:511, 2007, s:55-74.