Pilot Study on the Impact of VLE on Mathematical Concepts Acquisition within Secondary Education in England
Authors: Aaron A. R. Nwabude
The research investigates the “impact of VLE on mathematical concepts acquisition of the special education needs (SENs) students at KS4 secondary education sector" in England. The overall aim of the study is to establish possible areas of difficulties to approach for above or below knowledge standard requirements for KS4 students in the acquisition and validation of basic mathematical concepts. A teaching period, in which virtual learning environment (Fronter) was used to emphasise different mathematical perception and symbolic representation was carried out and task based survey conducted to 20 special education needs students [14 actually took part]. The result shows that students were able to process information and consider images, objects and numbers within the VLE at early stages of acquisition process. They were also able to carry out perceptual tasks but with limiting process of different quotient, thus they need teacher-s guidance to connect them to symbolic representations and sometimes coach them through. The pilot study further indicates that VLE curriculum approaches for students were minutely aligned with mathematics teaching which does not emphasise the integration of VLE into the existing curriculum and current teaching practice. There was also poor alignment of vision regarding the use of VLE in realisation of the objectives of teaching mathematics by the management. On the part of teacher training, not much was done to develop teacher-s skills in the technical and pedagogical aspects of VLE that is in-use at the school. The classroom observation confirmed teaching practice will find a reliance on VLE as an enhancer of mathematical skills, providing interaction and personalisation of learning to SEN students.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1063459Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1246
 T. Fuller, and S. Soderlund, "Futures: Academic practices of virtual learning by interaction," 2002. Available from: http://www.clsevier.com/locate/futures site visited: 02nd. Feb 2010.
 L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, sixth Edition, Routledge, 2007, pp. 3-5.
 M. Colman, and A. R.J. Briggs, Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management, Paul Chapman, Eds. London: 2002
 C. T. Diebold, G. Miller, L. K. Gensheimer, E. Mondschein, and H. Ohmart, "Building an intervention: A theoretical and practical infrastructure for planning, implementing, and evaluating a metropolitan-wide school-to-career initiative," Journal of Education and Psychological Consultation, 11 (1). 2000, pp.147-172.
 J. C Turner, and D. K. Meyer "Studying and understanding the instructional contexts of classrooms": Using our past to forge our future. Educational Psychologist, 35 (2), 2000, 69-85.
 G. Nuthall, "Relating classroom teaching to student learning" A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, (2004), 74:273-30. Available from: http://ww.linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii (site visited 2nd. Nov 2009)
 S. Stringfield, and C. Teddie, "The multiple roles of N.L. Gage in the creation of educational effectiveness fields" Teaching and Teacher education: V20. issue. No. 4, May 2004, pages 397-404.
 W. Huitt, , "Summary of theories relating to learning and development" Educational Psychology Interactive, Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University, 2006. Available from: http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/summary/lrndev.html site visited: 27th. March 2010
 W.H., Blaikie, Norman, "Approaches to social enquiry" Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK: 2003
 R. Yin, "Case study research" Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing. 1994
 P. Cross, "Introducing univariate statistical concepts" Pre-course reading 2009 - 2010, University of Greenwich London: 2010
 O. Wendy, (2004) "Triangulation in Social Research" Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Can Really Be Mixed ed. M. Holborn, Ormskirk: Causeway Press, 2004
 N. K. Denzin and Y.S., Lincolin, "Handbook of qualitative Research". London: Sage Publication, 2000.
 N. Golafshani, "Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research" The Qualitative Report, 8 (4), 2003, p. 597-606/601. Available from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-4/golafshani.pdf. site visited: 14th. Feb 2010
 C. Stenbacka, "Qualitative research requires quality" 2001, p. 602 Available from: http://www.ace.upm.edu.my/.../golafshanreliability/validity/qual/researc h.pdf site visited: 27th. March 2010
 M. Q. Patten, "qualitative evaluation and Research methods" 3rd ed. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2001,
 L. Colosi, "The Layman-s Guide to Social Research Methods - Reliability and Validity" What-s the Difference? 1997, p.2, Available from: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/tutorial/Colosi/lcolosi2.htm.. site visited 14th. Feb 2010
 A. Field, "Discovering Statistics Using SPSS". Second Edition, Sage publications Ltd. London: 2007