Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30848
A New Objective Weight on Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets

Authors: Nurnadiah Z., Lazim A.


The design of weight is one of the important parts in fuzzy decision making, as it would have a deep effect on the evaluation results. Entropy is one of the weight measure based on objective evaluation. Non--probabilistic-type entropy measures for fuzzy set and interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FS) have been developed and applied to weight measure. Since the entropy for (IT2FS) for decision making yet to be explored, this paper proposes a new objective weight method by using entropy weight method for multiple attribute decision making (MADM). This paper utilizes the nature of IT2FS concept in the evaluation process to assess the attribute weight based on the credibility of data. An example was presented to demonstrate the feasibility of the new method in decision making. The entropy measure of interval type-2 fuzzy sets yield flexible judgment and could be applied in decision making environment.

Keywords: interval type-2 fuzzy sets, type-2 fuzzy sets, Entropy weight, Objective weight, multiple attributedecision making

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1313


[1] Burillo, P. & Bustince, H. (1996). Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 305-316.
[2] Chen, C. T. (2000). Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1-9.
[3] Chen, S-M. & Lee, L-W. (2011). Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision- making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Journal of Expert Systems with Application,37, 2790-2798.
[4] De Luca, A. & Termini, S. (1972). A definition of non-probabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy sets theory. Journal of Information and Control, 20, 301-312.
[5] Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. S. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
[6] Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy entropy and conditioning. Journal of Information Sciences, 40(2), 165-174.
[7] Liu, H., & Kong, F. (2005). A new MADM algorithm based on fuzzy subjective and objective integrated weights. International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences, 1, 420-427.
[8] Mendel, J. M. (2001). Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
[9] Mendel, J. & Liang, Q. (2000). Equalization of nonlinear time-varying channels using type-2 fuzzy adaptive filters. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 8(5), 551-563.
[10] Mendel, J. M., John, R. I., & Liu, F. L. (2006). Interval type-2 fuzzy logical systems made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14(6), 808-821.
[11] Pal, N.R. & Pal, S.K. (1992). Higher-order fuzzy entropy and hybrid entropy of a set. Journal of Information Sciences, 61, 211-231.
[12] Saikat M. & Jaya S. (2009). Color Image Segmentation using Type-2 Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 1 (3), 1793-8163.
[13] Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communications. Journal of Bell Systems Technical, 27, 379-423.
[14] Szmidt, E. & Kacprzyk, J. (2000). Distances between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114 (3), 505-518.
[15] Szmidt, E. & Kacprzyk, J. (2001). Entropy for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118 (3), 467-477.
[16] Wang, T-C. & Lee, H-D. (2009). Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8980-8985.
[17] Yager, R. R. (1979). On the measure of fuzziness and negation. Part I: Membership in the unit interval. International Journal of General Systems, 5, 221-229.
[18] Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Journal of Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
[19] Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-1. Journal of Information Sciences, 8, 199-249.