Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31743
Structural Integrity Management for Fixed Offshore Platforms in Malaysia

Authors: Narayanan Sambu Potty , Mohammad Kabir B. Mohd Akram


Structural Integrity Management (SIM) is important for the protection of offshore crew, environment, business assets and company and industry reputation. API RP 2A contained guidelines for assessment of existing platforms mostly for the Gulf of Mexico (GOM). ISO 19902 SIM framework also does not specifically cater for Malaysia. There are about 200 platforms in Malaysia with 90 exceeding their design life. The Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd (PCSB) uses the Asset Integrity Management System and the very subjective Risk based Inspection Program for these platforms. Petronas currently doesn-t have a standalone Petronas Technical Standard PTS-SIM. This study proposes a recommended practice for the SIM process for offshore structures in Malaysia, including studies by API and ISO and local elements such as the number of platforms, types of facilities, age and risk ranking. Case study on SMG-A platform in Sabah shows missing or scattered platform data and a gap in inspection history. It is to undergo a level 3 underwater inspection in year 2015.

Keywords: platform, assessment, integrity, risk based inspection.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 6965


[1] API RP2A-WSD ÔÇÿRecommended Practice for Planning, Design and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platform-, 21st Edition.
[2] Mangiavacchi, A, Rodenbusch, G, Radford, S. And Wisch, D., 2005, API Offshore Structure Standards: RP 2┬░ and much more, OTC 17697, Houston, Texas, USA, 2-5 May.
[3] Banon, H., Bea, R.G., Bruen, F.J., Cornell, C.A., Krieger, W.F., and Stewart, D.A., 1994, Assessing Fitness for Purpose of Offshore Platforms 1: Analytical Methods and Inspections, Journal of Structural Engineering, 120, 12, December.
[4] API RP2A-LRFD ÔÇÿRecommended Practice for Planning, Design and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platform - Load and Resistance Factor Design-, 1st Edition, July 1, 1993.
[5] Westlake H.S, Puskar F.J, O-Connor P.E, Bucknell J.R and Defranco S.J, 2005, Structural Integrity Management (SIM) of offshore facilities, Proceedings 25th Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 17545.
[6] Wisch, D.J., Puskar, F.J., Laurendine, T.T., Connor, P.E., Versowsky, P.E and Bucknell,J., 2004, An Update on API RP 2A Section 17 for the Assessment of Existing Platforms, OTC 16820, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 3 - 6 May.
[7] Notice To Leases (NTL) No. 2003 - G16, 2003, Assessment of Existing OCS Platforms, United States Department of Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region
[8] Puskar, F.J., Verrel, S.M., and Roberts, C., 2007, Fixed Platform Performance During Recent Hurricanes: Comparison to Design Standards, OTC 18989, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 30 April - 3 May.
[9] Puskar, F.J., Spong, R.E. and Ku, A.,Gilbert ,R.B. and Choi, Y.J., 2006, Assessment of Fixed Offshore Platform Performance in Hurricane Ivan, OTC 18325, Houston Texas, USA, 1-4 May.
[10] Pushkar, F.J., Westlake, H.S., O-Connor, P.E.and J.R. Bucknell, 2006, The Development of a recommended Practice for Structural Integrity Management of Fixed Offshore Platforms, OTC 18332, Houston, Texas, USA, 1-4 May.
[11] May, P., 2009, Structural Integrity Management framework for fixed jacket structures, research report RR684, prepared by Atkins Limited for Health and Safety Executive, Report RR684.
[12] O- Connor, P.E., J.R.Bucknell, S.J. DeFranco, H.S.Westlake and F.J. Puskar, 2005, Structural Integrity Management (SIM) of Offshore Facilities, OTC 17545, Houston, Texas, USA, 2-5 May.
[13] Bolt, H.M., 1995, Results from Large Scale Ultimate Strength Tests of K braced Jacket Frame Structures, OTC, paper No: 7783, May.
[14] Westlake, H.S., Puskar, F.J., O-Connor, P.E. and Bucknell, J.R., 2006, The Role of Ultimate Strength Assessments in the Structural Integrity Management of Offshore Structures, OTC 2006, Houston Texas, USA, 1-4 May.
[15] EQE International, 2004, Effect of platform robustness on inspection planning, HSE Research Report 246.
[16] UK HSE, 1997, Comparison of Reserve Strength ratios of Old and New Platforms - Offshore Technology Report, OTO 97 046, June.
[17] Onoufriou, T., 1999, Reliability based inspection planning of offshore structures, Marine Structures, 521-539.
[18] Sorenson, J.D. and Ersdal, G., 2008, Safety and inspection planning of older installations, Proceedings, IMechE, Vol 222, Part O : Risk and Reliability.
[19] International Standard Organization (ISO) 19902 ÔÇÿPetroleum and Natural Gas Industries- Fixed Steel Offshore Structures-, 1st edition 2007-12-01.
[20] Petronas Technical Specification, 1987, Practice for assessment of the Structural Integrity of Existing Fixed Structure, PTS 20.063, May.
[21] Petronas Technical Standards, 2001, Manual for Structural Inspection of offshore Installations, PTS, October.
[22] Mohammad Kabir B. M.A., 2009, Structural Integrity Management for fixed offshore structures in Malaysia, BE Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia, June.
[23] Patel. R.J, Risk Based Inspection, 2005, Middle East Non Destructive Testing Conference and Exhibition, Bahrain, Manama.
[24] Bucknell, J., Lalani M., Gebara J., and Puskar F.J., 2000, Rationalization And Optimization Of Underwater Inspection Planning Consistent With API RP2A Section 14.
[25] Mortazavi, M., and Bea. R.G., 1997, Experimental Validation of the Ultimate Limit State Equilibrium Analysis (ULSLEA) with Results from Frame Tests, 7th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, May 25-30.
[26] UK HSE, 1992, A review of the ultimate strength of Tubular Framed Structures, OTH 92 365, Offshore Technology Report