Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Application of Fluorescent Pseudomonads Inoculant Formulations on Vigna mungo through Field Trial
Authors: Sarma. M.V.R.K, Saharan. K, Prakash. A, Bisaria. V. S, Sahai.V
Abstract:
Vermiculite was used to develop inorganic carrier-based formulations of fluorescent pseudomonad strains R62 and R81. The effect of bio-inoculation of fluorescent pseudomonad strains R62 and R81 (plant growth promoting and biocontrol agent) on growth responses of Vigna-mungo under field condition was enumerated. The combined bioinoculation of these two organisms in a formuation increased the pods yield by 300% in comparison to the control crop. There was also significant increment in the other plant growth responses such as dry root weight, dry shoot weight, shoot length and number of branches per plant.Keywords: Bio-inoculants formulation, Fluorescent pseudomonad, Plant growth promotion activity.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1063040
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2053References:
[1] Alagawadi, A.R., Gaur, A.C., 1988. Associative effect of Rhizobium and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria on the yield and nutrient uptake of chickpea. Plant Soil 105, 241-246.
[2] Bashan, Y., 1998. Inoculants of plant growth promoting bacteria for use in agriculture. Biotechnological Advances 16, 729-770.
[3] Bajpai, P.D., Sundara Rao, W.V.B., 1971. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria Part III. Soil inoculation with phorous solubilizing bacteria. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 17, 46-52.
[4] Bashan,Y., Levanony, H., 1988. Adsorption of the rhizosphere bacterium Azospirillum brusilense Cd to soil, sand and peat particles. General. Microbiology 134, 1811-1820.
[5] Bennett, J.W., Lane, S.D., 1992. The potential role of Trichoderma viride in the integrated control of Botrytis fabae. Mycologist 6, 199- 201.
[6] Beck, D. P., 1991. Suitability of charcoal amended mineral soil as carrier for rhizobium inoculants. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 23, 41-44.
[7] Chet, I., 1987. TrichodermaÔÇöapplication, mode of action and potential as a biocontrol agent of soil borne plant pathogenic fungi. In: Chet, I. (Ed.), Innovative Approaches to Plant Disease Control, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 137-160.
[8] DeFreitas, J.R., Germide, J.J., 1992. Growth promotion of winter wheat by fluorescent pseudomonas under growth chamber conditions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 24, 1127-1135.
[9] Dorosinsky, L.M., Kadyrov, A.A., 1975. Effect of inoculation of nitrogen fixation by chickpea, its crop and content of protein. Microbiologiya 44, 1103-1106.
[10] Glick, B. R., 1995. The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can J. Microbiol 41, 109-117.
[11] Gaur, R., 2003. Diversity of DAPG and ACC deaminase producing rhizobacteria from wheat. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Microbiology, GB Pantnagar University of Ariculture & Technology, Uttar Pradesh, India.
[12] Gaur, R., Shani, N., Kawaljeet, K., Johri, B.N., Rossi, P., Aragno, M., 2004. Diacetylphloroglucinol-producing pseudomonads do not influence AM fungi in wheat rhizosphere. Current Science 86, 453- 457.
[13] Herandez, L.G., Hill, G.S., 1983. Effect of plant population and inoculation on yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Proc. Agron. Soc. N.Z. 13, 75-79.
[14] Gaur, A.C., Ostwal, K.P., Mathur, R.S., 1980. Save super phosphate by using phosphate-solubilizing cultures and rock phosphate. Kheti 32, 23-25.
[15] Gupta, S.C., Namdeo, S.L., 1997. Effect of Rhizobium, phosphate solubilizing bacteria and FYM on nodulation, grain yield and quality of chickpea. Indian J. Pulses. Res. 10, 171-174.
[16] Johri, B.N., Sharma, A., Sharma, A.K., Glick, B.R., 2003. Plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas sp. strain GRP3 influences iron acquisition in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilzeck). Soil Biology & Biochemistry 35, 887-894.
[17] Jain, P.C., Kushawaha, P.S., Dhakal, U.S., Khan, H., Trivedi, S.M., 1999. Response of chickpea (cicer arietinum L.) to phosphorus and biofertilzier. Legume. Res. 22, 241-244.
[18] King, J.V., 1948. The mineral requrements for fluorescin production. Can. J. Res 26c, 514-519.
[19] Kloepper, J. W., Schroth, M. N., 1981. Development of powder formulation of rhizobacteria for inoculation of potato seed pieces. Phytopathology 71, 590-592.
[20] Khurana, A.S., Sharma, P., 2000. Effect of dual inoculation of phosphate solubilizing bacteria, Bradyrhizobium sp. (cicer) and phosphorus on nitrogen fixation and yield of chickpea. Indian J. Pulses. Res. 13, 66-67.
[21] Kumar, R.N., Mukerji, K.G., 1996. Integrated disease managementfuture perspectives. In: Mukerji, K.G., Mathur, B., Chamola, B.P., Chitralekha, C. (Eds.), Advances in Botany, APH publishing Corp, New Delhi, pp. 335-347.
[22] Meyer, J.M., Abdallah, M.A., 1978. The fluorescent pigment of Pseudomonas fluorescens: Biosynthesis, purification and physiochemical properties. Journal General. Microbiology 107, 319- 328.
[23] Mukhopadhyay, A.N., Brahmbatt, A., Patel, G.J., 1986. Trichoderma harzianum: a potential biocontrol agent for tobacco damping-off. Tobacco. Res. 12, 26-35.
[24] Nair, N. G., Fahy, P.C., 1976. Commercial application of biological control of mushroom bacteria blotch. Australian Journal Agriculture Research 27, 415-422.
[25] Nelson, L. M., 2004. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Prospects for new inoculants. Plant Management Network. Doi: 10.1094/CM-2004-0301-05-RV.
[26] Rudresha,D.L., Shivaprakasha, M.K., Prasad, R.D.., 2005. Effect of combined application of Rhizobium, phosphate solubilizing bacterium and Trichoderma spp. on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of chickpea (Cicer aritenium L.) Applied Soil Ecology 28 139-146.
[27] Rice, W.A., Olsen, P.E., 1988. Soil inoculants for alfalfa grown on moderately acid soil. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 19, 947-956.
[28] Roesti, D., Gaur, R., Johri, B.N., Imfeld, G., Sharma, S., Kwaljeet, K., Aragno, M., 2006. Plant growth stage, fertilizer management and bio-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria affect the rhizobacterial community structure in rain-fed wheat fields. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38, 1111-1120.
[29] Podile, A. R., Kishore, G. K., 2006. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria, Plant Associated Bacteria 3, 195-230.
[30] Papavizas, G.C., 1985. Trichoderma and Gliocladium: biology, ecology and potential for biocontrol. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 23, 23- 54.
[31] Pierson, E.A., Weller, D.M., 1994. Use of mixtures of fluorescent pseudomonas to supress take-all and improve the growth of wheat. Phytopathology 84, 940-947.
[32] Paau, A.S., 1988. Formulation useful in applying beneficial microorganisms to seeds. Recent Trends in Biotechnology 6, 276- 279.
[33] Suslow, T. V., Schroth, M. N., 1982. Rhizobacteria of sugar beets;Effect of seed application and root colonization in yield. Phytopathology 72, 199-206.
[34] The fertilizer (control) order 1985 (As ammended upto June 2006). The Fertilizer Association of India. (On line) http://www.dacnet.nic.in/ncof/quality_standards.htm/ (June 2006).
[35] Voisard, C., Keel, C., Hass, D. and Defago, G., 1989. Cyanide production by Pseudomonas fluorescens suppress black root rot of tobacco under gnotobiotic conditions. European Molecular Biology Organization Journal 8, 351-358.
[36] Vidhyasekaran, P., Muthamilan,M., 1995. Development of formulation of fluorescent pseudomonas fluorescens for control of chickpea wilt. Plant Disease 79, 782-786.
[37] Vidhyasekaran, P., Sethuraman, K., Rajappan, K., Vasumathi, K., 1997a. Powder Formulations of Pseudomonas fluoresces to Control Pigeon pea Wilt, Biological control 8, 166-171.
[38] Vidhyasekaran, P., Rabindran, R., Muthamilan, M., Nayar, K., Rajappan, K., Subramanian N., Vasumathi, K., 1997b. Development of a powder formulation of Pseudomonas fluorescens for contol of rice blast. Plant Pathology 46 (3), 291-297.