Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Agreement Options in Multi-person Decision on Optimizing High-Rise Building Columns

Authors: Christiono Utomo, Arazi Idrus, Madzlan Napiah, Mohd. Faris Khamidi

Abstract:

This paper presents a conceptual model of agreement options for negotiation support in multi-person decision on optimizing high-rise building columns. The decision is complicated since many parties involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solutions. There are different concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and background. Such building columns as alternatives are referred to as agreement options which are determined by identifying the possible decision maker group, followed by determining the optimal solution for each group. The group in this paper is based on three-decision makers preferences that are designer, programmer, and construction manager. Decision techniques applied to determine the relative value of the alternative solutions for performing the function. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied for decision process and game theory based agent system for coalition formation. An n-person cooperative game is represented by the set of all players. The proposed coalition formation model enables each agent to select individually its allies or coalition. It further emphasizes the importance of performance evaluation in the design process and value-based decision.

Keywords: Agreement options, coalition, group choice, game theory, building columns selection.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1062964

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1308

References:


[1] Zarafat Angiz L, A. Emrouznejad, A. Rashid Komijan, "Selecting the most preferable alternatives in a group decision making problem using DEA," Expert System with Applications, article in press, 2008.
[2] J. Andrysek, M. Karny, J. Kracik (editors), Multiple Participant Decision Making - International Series on Advanced Intelligence vol. 9, Adelaide: Advance Knowledge International, 2004.
[3] C. Utomo, A. Idrus, M. Napiah, "Methodology for Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation Support on Value-based Decision," Proceeding International Conference on Advance Computer Control, IEEE Computer Society, Singapore, January 2009, pp.365-369.
[4] C. Utomo, A. Idrus, M. Napiah, M. Faris Khamidi, "Agreement Options on Multi Criteria Group Decision and Negotiation," Proceeding International Conference on Operation Research, WASET, Penang Malaysia, February 2009.
[5] J.J. Kaufman and R. Woodhead, Stimulating Innovation in Products and Services with Function Analysis Mapping, New Jersey: John Wiley&Sons. 2006.
[6] T.L. Saaty, The Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, volume IV of AHP Series. RWS Publications, Pittsburg. 1996.
[7] P.K. Dey, "Integrated project evaluation and selection using multi attribute decision making technique," International Journal Production Economics, vol. 103, pp. 90-103, 2006.
[8] T. Wanyama, Decision support for COTS selection. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Calgary, 2006.
[9] J. Wang, and S. Zionts, "Negotiating wisely, considerations based on MCDM/MAUT". European Journal of Operation Research, vol. 188 pp.191-205, 2008.
[10] R. LinJ.S-J Lin, J. Chang, D. Tang, H. Chao, P. C Julian, "Note on group consistency in analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research 190, 2008, pp 672-678.
[11] R. V. Rao, Decision making in the Manufacturing Environment using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. Springer, London 2007.
[12] J. Vanicek, I. Vrana, S.Aly, "Fuzzy aggregation and averaging for group decision: a generalization and survey," Knowledge-Based System, vol. 22, no. 1, January 2009, pp.79-84.
[13] S. Kraus, Strategic Negotiation in Multi-agent Environment. MIT Press, 2001.
[14] T. Wanyama, "Static and dynamic coalition formation in group-choice decision making," in V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, and Y. Oshida (Eds.): MDAI 2007, LNAI 4617, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2007, pp. 45-56.
[15] T.W. Sandholm and V.R. Lesser "Coalitions among computationally bounded agents," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 94, no.1, pp. 99-137. Special issue on Economic Principles of Multi agent Systems. 1997.
[16] A. Gomes, "A Theory of negotiation and formation of coalitions," CARESS Working Paper 99-12, University of Pennsylvania, 1999.
[17] M.J. Scott, "Formalizing negotiation in engineering design," Ph.D. dissertation, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, 1999.
[18] M. Morge, and P. Beaune, "A Negotiation Support System Based on Multi-agent System: Specify & Preference Relation on Arguments," ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2004.
[19] J.P. Kahan and A. Rapoport, Theories of Coalition Formation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 1984.
[20] T. Wanyama and B.H. Far. "Negotiation coalitions in group-choice multi-agent systems," in AAMAS-06, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan. 2006, pp. 408-410.
[21] T. Wanyama, and B.H. Far, "A protocol for multi-agent negotiation in a group-choice decision-making," Journal of Network and Com puter Applications, vol. 30, pp.1173-1195, 2007.