Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31903
Strategic Software Development: Productivity Comparisons of General Development Programs

Authors: Craig Comstock, Zhizhong Jiang, Peter Naudé

Abstract:

Productivity has been one of the major concerns with the increasingly high cost of software development. Choosing the right development language with high productivity is one approach to reduce development costs. Working on the large database with 4106 projects ever developed, we found the factors significant to productivity. After the removal of the effects of other factors on productivity, we compare the productivity differences of the ten general development programs. The study supports the fact that fourth-generation languages are more productive than thirdgeneration languages.

Keywords: Functional point, language, productivity, software engineering.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1062878

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1599

References:


[1] R. S. Pressman, Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. London: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
[2] H. V. Vliet, Software Engineering: Principles and Practice. Chichester: Wiley, 1993.
[3] S. T. Albin, The Art of Software Architecture: Design Methods and Techniques. New York: Wiley, 2003.
[4] J. D. Blackburn, G. D. Scudder, and L. N. V. Wassenhove, "Improving speed and productivity of software development: a global survey of software developers," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 22, pp. 875-885, 1996.
[5] B. W. Boehm and P. N. Papaccio, "Understanding and Controlling Software Costs," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 1462-1477, 1988.
[6] D. N. Card, F. E. McGarry, and G. T. Page, "Evaluating software engineering technologies," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. SE-13, pp. 845-851, 1987.
[7] G. R. Finnie, G. E. Wittig, and D. Petkov, "Prioritizing software development productivity factors using the analytic hierarchy process," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 22, pp. 129-139, 1993.
[8] N. R. Howes, "Managing software development projects for maximum productivity," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. SE10, pp. 27-35, 1984.
[9] R. E. Loesh, "Improving productivity through standard design templates," Data Processing, vol. 27, pp. 57-59, 1985.
[10] K. Maxwell, L. V. Wassenhove, and S. Dutta, "Software development productivity of European space, military and industrial applications," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 22, pp. 706-718, 1996.
[11] Q. Liu and R. C. Mintram, "Preliminary data analysis methods in software estimation," Software Quality Journal, vol. 13, pp. 91-115, 2005.
[12] W. Harrison, "A flexible method for maintaining software metrics data: a universal metrics repository," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 72, pp. 225-234, 2004.
[13] C. J. Lokan, "An empirical analysis of function point adjustment factors," Information and Software Technology, vol. 42, pp. 649-660, 2000.
[14] R. Jeffery, M. Ruhe, and I. Wieczorek, "A comparative study of two software development cost modeling techniques using multiorganizational and company-specific data," Information and Software Technology, vol. 42, pp. 1009-1016, 2000.
[15] J. J. Cuadrado-Gallego, M. Sicilia, M. Garre, and D. Rodríguez, "An empirical study of process-related attributes in segmented software costestimation relationships," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 79, pp. 353-361, 2006.
[16] J. Moses, M. Farrow, N. Parrington, and P. Smith, "A productivity benchmarking case study using Bayesian credible intervals," Software Quality Journal, vol. 14, pp. 37-52, 2006.
[17] L. B. Wilson and R. G. Clark, Comparative Programming Languages. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley, 1988.
[18] K. C. Louden, Programming Languages: Principles and Practice London: Brooks/Cole, 2003.
[19] R. Cezzar, A Guide to Programming Languages: Overview and Comparison. Boston: Artech House, 1995.
[20] J. R. Groff and P. N. Weinberg, SQL: The Complete Reference New York McGraw-Hill, 2002.
[21] D. D. Deyhimi, D. S. Heath, and D. Mosley, Advanced PowerBuilder 4.0 Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1995.
[22] J. T. Perry, Understanding Oracle. San Francisco: Sybex, 1989.
[23] E. Jones, Developing Client/Server Applications with Microsoft Access. London: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
[24] R. R. Newton and K. E. Rudestam, Your Statistical Consultant: Answers to Your Data Analysis Questions. London: SAGE, 1999.
[25] F. Louis, "Team size and productivity in systems development," Information Systems Management, vol. 8, pp. 27-35, 1991.
[26] S. D. Conte, H. E. Dunsmore, and Y. E. Shen, Software Engineering Metrics and Models. Redwood City, CA: Benjamin-Cummings Publishing, 1986.
[27] E. Mendes and B. Kitchenham, "Web Productivity Measurement and Benchmarking," in Web Engineering, E. Mendes and N. Mosley, Eds. Berlin: Springer, 2006, pp. 75-106.
[28] B. P. Lientz, E. B. Swanson, and G. E. Tompkins, "Characteristics of application software maintenance," Communications of the ACM, vol. 21, pp. 466-471, 1978.
[29] G. H. Subramanian, P. C. Pendharkar, and M. Wallace, "An empirical study of the effect of complexity, platform, and program type on software development effort of business applications," Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 541-553, 2006.
[30] J. Martin, Rapid Application Development. New York: Macmillan, 1991.
[31] R. D. Banker and R. J. Kauffman, "Reuse and productivity in integrated computer-aided software engineering: an empirical study," MIS Quarterly, vol. 15, pp. 375-401, 1991.
[32] C. Necco, N. W. Tsai, and K. W. Holgeson, "Current usage of CASE software," Journal of Systems Management, vol. 40, pp. 6-11, 1989.
[33] R. T. Coupe and N. M. Onodu, "An empirical evaluation of the impact of CASE on developer productivity and software quality," Journal of Information Technology, vol. 11, pp. 173-181, 1996.
[34] D. Flynn, J. Vagner, and O. D. Vecchio, "Is CASE technology improving quality and productivity in software development?" Logistics Information Management, vol. 8, pp. 8-23, 1995.
[35] T. Bruckhaus, N. H. Madhavii, I. Janssen, and J. Henshaw, "The impact of tools on software productivity," IEEE Software, vol. 13, pp. 29-38, 1996.
[36] S. A. Green, "How many subjects does it take to do a multiple regression analysis?" Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 26, pp. 499-510, 1991.
[37] A. C. Rencher, Linear Models in Statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
[38] W. J. Krzanowski, An Introduction to Statistical Modelling. London: Arnold, 1998.
[39] R. Klepper and D. Bock, "Third and fourth generation language productivity differences," Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, pp. 69- 79, 1995.