Knowledge Sharing Behavior in E-Communities: from the Perspective of Transaction Cost Theory

Authors: Teresa L. Ju, Szu-Yuan Sun, Pei-Ju Chao, Chang-Yao Wu

Abstract:

This study aims to examine the factors affecting knowledge sharing behavior in knowledge-based electronic communities (e-communities) because quantity and quality of knowledge shared among the members play a critical role in the community-s sustainability. Past research has suggested three perspectives that may affect the quantity and quality of knowledge shared: economics, social psychology, and social ecology. In this study, we strongly believe that an economic perspective may be suitable to validate factors influencing newly registered members- knowledge contribution at the beginning of relationship development. Accordingly, this study proposes a model to validate the factors influencing members- knowledge sharing based on Transaction Cost Theory. By doing so, we may empirically test our hypotheses in various types of e-communities to determine the generalizability of our research models.

Keywords: Electronic community, individual behavior, knowledge sharing, transaction cost theory.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1062608

References:

[1] A. Kankanhalli and C.Y.B. Tan and K.K. Wei, "Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation," MIS Quarterly, vol.29, no.1, pp.113-143, 2005.
[2] A. W. Joshi and R. L. Stump, "The contingent effect of specific asset investments on joint action in manufacturer-supplier relationships: An empirical test of the moderating role of reciprocal asset investments, uncertainty, and trust," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol.27, no.3, pp.291-305, 1999.
[3] C.M. Chiu and M.H. Hsu and E. T.G. Wang, "Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories," Decision Support Systems, vol.42, no.3, pp.1872-1888, 2006.
[4] F.S. Lee and D. Vogel and M. Limayem, "Virtual community informatics: a review and research agenda," Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, vol.5, no.1, pp.47-61, 2003.
[5] G..W. Bock and Y.G.. Kim, "Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing," Information Resources Management Journal, vol.15, no.2, pp.14-21, 2002.
[6] G.C. Helmstadter, Principles of Psychological Measurement. N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.
[7] G.W. Bock and R.W. Zmud and Y. Kim and J. Lee, "Behavioral intention formation knowledge sharing: Examining roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate," MIS Quarterly, vol.29, no.1, pp.87-111, 2005.
[8] J. Cohen and P. Cohen, Applied Mulitiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2d ed. Hillsdale, NJ´╝ÜLawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.]
[9] J. F. Hair and Jr., R. E. Anderson and R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1995.
[10] L.D. Molm, "Molm, Risk and power use: constraints on the use of coercion in exchange," Am Sociol Rev, vol. 62, pp. 113-133, 1997.
[11] M. Alavi and D. E. Leidner, "Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues," MIS Quarterly, vol.25, no.1, pp.107-136, 2001.
[12] M. Gibbert and H. Krause, Practice Exchange in a Best Practice Marketplace, in Knowledge Management Case Book: Siemens Best Practices, T. H. Davenport and G. J. B. Probst (Eds.), Publicis Corporate Publishing, Erlangen, Germany, pp. 89-105, 2002.
[13] M. Granovetter, "Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness," American Journal of Sociology, vol.91(November), pp.481-510, 1985.
[14] M. Osterloh, and B.S. Frey, "Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms," Organization Science, vol.11, no.5, pp.538-550, 2000.
[15] M.H. Hsu and T.L. Ju and C.H. Yen and C.M. Chang, "Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.65, pp.153-169, 2007.
[16] M.M. Wasko, S. Faraj, "It Is What One Does: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice," Journal of Strategic Information Systems vol.9, no.2-3, pp. 155-173, 2000.
[17] M.M. Wasko, S. Faraj, "Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice," MIS Quarterly, vol.29, no.1, pp.35-58, 2005.
[18] N. Smelser and R. Swedberg, The Handbook of Economic Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
[19] O. Williamson, "The logic of economic organization," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization vol.4, pp. 65-93, 1988.
[20] O.E. Williamson, "The modern corporation: origins, evolution, attributes," J. Econ. Lit, vol.19, pp. 1537-1568, 1981.
[21] O.E. Williamson, "Transaction cost economics: the governance of contractual relations," Journal of Law and Economics vol.22, no.2, pp. 233-261, 1979.
[22] O.E. Williamson, Economic Organization: Firms, Markets and Policy Control, The Free Press, New York, 1986.
[23] O.E. Williamson, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. The Free Press, New York, 1975.
[24] O.E. Williamson, The governance of contractual relations. In The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press, New york, pp.68-84, 1985.
[25] R.H. Coase, "The nature of the firm. Economica 4," pp.386-405,1937.
[26] R.L. Purvis and V. Sambamurthy and R.W. Zmud, "The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation," Organization Science, vol.12, no.2, pp.117-135, 2001.
[27] S. Ryu and S.H. Ho and I. Han, "Knowledge sharing behavior of physicians in hospitals," Expert Systems with Applications, vol.25, no.1, pp.113-122, 2003.
[28] T. Nishiguchi, Strategic industrial sourcing: the Japanese advantage, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.
[29] V. Rangan and Kasturi and S. Lasley, Rohm and Haas: New Product Marketing Strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, Case No. 9-587-055, 1993.