Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Surface Topography Assessment Techniques based on an In-process Monitoring Approach of Tool Wear and Cutting Force Signature

Authors: A. M. Alaskari, S. E. Oraby

Abstract:

The quality of a machined surface is becoming more and more important to justify the increasing demands of sophisticated component performance, longevity, and reliability. Usually, any machining operation leaves its own characteristic evidence on the machined surface in the form of finely spaced micro irregularities (surface roughness) left by the associated indeterministic characteristics of the different elements of the system: tool-machineworkpart- cutting parameters. However, one of the most influential sources in machining affecting surface roughness is the instantaneous state of tool edge. The main objective of the current work is to relate the in-process immeasurable cutting edge deformation and surface roughness to a more reliable easy-to-measure force signals using a robust non-linear time-dependent modeling regression techniques. Time-dependent modeling is beneficial when modern machining systems, such as adaptive control techniques are considered, where the state of the machined surface and the health of the cutting edge are monitored, assessed and controlled online using realtime information provided by the variability encountered in the measured force signals. Correlation between wear propagation and roughness variation is developed throughout the different edge lifetimes. The surface roughness is further evaluated in the light of the variation in both the static and the dynamic force signals. Consistent correlation is found between surface roughness variation and tool wear progress within its initial and constant regions. At the first few seconds of cutting, expected and well known trend of the effect of the cutting parameters is observed. Surface roughness is positively influenced by the level of the feed rate and negatively by the cutting speed. As cutting continues, roughness is affected, to different extents, by the rather localized wear modes either on the tool nose or on its flank areas. Moreover, it seems that roughness varies as wear attitude transfers from one mode to another and, in general, it is shown that it is improved as wear increases but with possible corresponding workpart dimensional inaccuracy. The dynamic force signals are found reasonably sensitive to simulate either the progressive or the random modes of tool edge deformation. While the frictional force components, feeding and radial, are found informative regarding progressive wear modes, the vertical (power) components is found more representative carrier to system instability resulting from the edge-s random deformation.

Keywords: Dynamic force signals, surface roughness (finish), tool wear and deformation, tool wear modes (nose, flank)

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1062364

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1082

References:


[1] Machinability Data Handbook Machinability Data, Machinability Data Center, 2nd Edition 1972.
[2] C. Y. H. Lim, S. C. Lim and K. S. Lee , "Machining conditions and the wear of TiC-coated tools", Wear Progress in Manufacturing, ASTM. STP 1362, pp. 57-69, 1999.
[3] S. E. Oraby and D. R. Hayhurst, "Development of models for tool wear force relationships in metal cutting," International Journal of Mechanical Science, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 125-138, 1991.
[4] S. E. Oraby, "Monitoring of machining processes via force signals - Part I: Recognition of different tool failure forms by spectral analysis," Wear, vol. 33, pp. 133-143, 1995.
[5] J. W. Youn and M. Y. Yang, "A study on the relationships between static/dynamic cutting force components and tool wear," Trans ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 196-205, 2001.
[6] S. E. Oraby and D. R. Hayhurst, "Tool life determination based on the measurement of wear and tool force ratio variation," International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, vol. 44, pp. 1261-1269, 2004.
[7] S. E. Oraby, A. F. Al-Mudhaf and D. R. Hayhurst, "A diagnostic approach for turning tool based on the dynamic force signals," Trans. ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 127, pp. 463-475, 2005.
[8] A. Zehnder, Y. Potdor and X. Deng, "Measurement and simulation of temperature and strain fields in orthogonal metal cutting," International Congress of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (ICTAM 2000).
[9] G. Dawson, "Machining hardened steel with polycrystalline cubic boron nitride cutting tools," Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2002.
[10] H. Shao, H. L. Wang and X. M. Zhao, "A cutting power model for tool wear monitoring in milling," International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, vol. 44, pp. 1503-1509, 2004.
[11] S. C. Lin and M. F. Chang, "A study on the effects of vibrations on the surface finish using a surface topography simulation model for turning," International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 763-782, 1998.
[12] S. V. Kamarthi and S. R. T. Kumara, "Flank wear estimation in turning through wavelet representation of acoustic emission signals," Trans ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 12-19, 2000.
[13] C. XiaoQi., Z. Hao and D. Wildermuth, "In-process tool wear monitoring through acoustic emission sensing," SIMTECH Technical report (AT/01/014/AMP), Automated Material Processing Group. Automation Technology Division, Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, 2001.
[14] S. Y. Liang, R. L. Hecker and Landers, "Machining processes monitoring and control: the state-of-the-art," in Proc IMECE-2 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2002.
[15] S. K. Choudhury, V. K. Jain and S. R. Krishna, "On-line monitoring of tool wear and control of dimensional inaccuracy in turning," Trans. ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 10-12, 2001.
[16] X. D. Fang and H. S. J. Shahi, "A new algorithm for developing a reference-based model for predicting surface roughness in finish machining of steels," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 179-199, 1997.
[17] R. Azouzi and M. Guillot, "Online prediction of surface finish and dimensional deviation in turning using neural network based sensor fusion," International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1201-1217, 1997.
[18] P. V. S. Suresh, P. V. Rao and S. G. Deshmukh, "A genetic algorithm approach for optimization of surface roughness prediction model," International journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 675-680, 2002.
[19] C. S. Rao and R. R. Srikant, "Tool wear monitoring - An intelligent approach," in Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineering (IMECH2004), Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol. 218, pp. 905-912, 2004.
[20] E. O. Ezugwu, D. A. Fadare, J. Bonney, R. D. Das Silvaand W. F. Sales, "Modelling the correlation between cutting and process parameters in high-speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy using an artificial neural network," International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, vol. 45, pp. 1375-1385, 2005.
[21] P. Balakrishanan and M. F. DeVries, "Analysis of mathematical model building techniques adaptable data base systems," in Proc. NAMRC-XI, pp. 466-475, 1983.
[22] N. R. Draper and H. Smith, Applied regression analysis, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1967.
[23] W. W. Hines and D. C. Montgomery, Probability and statistics in engineering and management Science, John Wily&Sons, 2nd edition, 1982.
[24] S. E. Oraby and D. R. Hayhurst, "High-capacity compact threecomponent cutting force dynamometer," International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacturing, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 549-559, 1990.
[25] M. Zecchino, "Why average roughness is not enough: advances in three dimensional measurement techniques such as optical profiling have given engineers, process designers, and quality control professionals a significantly improved toolkit for describing surfaces," ASM, Advances Materials & Processes, 2003.
[26] G. Schuetz, "Rx for Ra measurements - average roughness," Modern Machine Shop (www.mmsonline.com), 1994.
[27] J. Chen and S. Lee, "On-line surface roughness system using an accelerometers in turning operations," Journal of Engineering Technolog, 2003.
[28] W. Grzesk and T. Wanat, "Comparative assessment of surface roughness produced by hard machining with mixed ceramic tools including 2D and 3D analysis," Journal of Materials processing Technology, vol. 169, no. 3, pp. 364-371, 2005.