Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30067
Spine Evaluation Device with Visual Feedback

Authors: T. Hirata, G. H. Yokoyama, L. H. M. Duque

Abstract:

The posteroanterior manipulation technique is usually include in the procedure of the lumbar spine to evaluate the intervertebral motion according to mechanical resistance. The mechanical device with visual feedback was proposed that allows one to analysis the lumbar segments mobility “in vivo" facilitating for the therapist to take its treatment evolution. The measuring system uses load cell and displacement sensor to estimate spine stiffness. In this work, the device was tested by 2 therapists, female, applying posteroanterior force techniques to 5 volunteers, female, with frequency of approximately 1.2-1.8 Hz. A test-retest procedure was used for 2 periods of day. The visual feedback results small variation of forces and cycle time during 6 cycles rhythmic application. The stiffness values showed good agreement between test-retest procedures when used same order of maximum forces.

Keywords: Biomechanics, lumber spine stiffness, intervertebral manipulation device, visual feedback

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1061948

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF

References:


[1] A. A. White and M. M. Panjabi, "Clinical biomechanics of the spine" , 2nd ed., Philadelphia,: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1990, ch1.
[2] T. C. Keller and C. Colloca, "A rigid body model of the dynamic posteroanterior motion response of the human lumber spine" J. Manip. Phys. Therap., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 485-496, Oct. 2002.
[3] S. V. Bjornsdottir and S.Kumar, "Posterior spinal mobilization: state of the art review and discussion" Disability and Rehab.., vol. 19, pp. 39-46, 1997.
[4] J. Gregory and D. C. Leman, "Biomechanical assessment of lumber spinal function How low back pain sufferers differ from normals. Implications for outcome measures research. Part I: Kinematic assessments of lumber function" J. Manip. Phys. Therap., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 57-62, Jan. 2004.
[5] T. Ikegami et al., "Intermittent visual feedback can boost motor learning of rhythmic movements: Evidence for error feedback beyond cycles" J. Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 653-657, Jan. 2012.
[6] F. B. Ensink et al., "Lumber range of motion: Influence of time of day and individual factors measurements ", Spine, vol. 21, no. 11, pp1339- 1343, Jun 1996.
[7] L. Nicholson et al., "Stiffness properties of the human lumber spine: A lumped parameter model" Clinical Biomech., vol. 16, pp. 285-292, 2001.
[8] E. F. Owens et al., "The reliability of a posterior-to-anterior spinal stiffness measuring system in a population of patents with low back pain" J.Manip.Phys Therap., vol. 30, no. 2, pp 116-123, 2007.
[9] J. Latimer et al., "Evaluation f a new device for measuring responses to posteroanterior forces in a patient population, Part 1: Reliability testing", Phys. Therapy, vol. 76, no. 2, pp 158-165, Feb. 1996.