Managing Iterations in Product Design and Development

Authors: K. Aravindhan, Trishit Bandyopadhyay, Mahesh Mehendale, Supriya Kumar De

Abstract:

The inherent iterative nature of product design and development poses significant challenge to reduce the product design and development time (PD). In order to shorten the time to market, organizations have adopted concurrent development where multiple specialized tasks and design activities are carried out in parallel. Iterative nature of work coupled with the overlap of activities can result in unpredictable time to completion and significant rework. Many of the products have missed the time to market window due to unanticipated or rather unplanned iteration and rework. The iterative and often overlapped processes introduce greater amounts of ambiguity in design and development, where the traditional methods and tools of project management provide less value. In this context, identifying critical metrics to understand the iteration probability is an open research area where significant contribution can be made given that iteration has been the key driver of cost and schedule risk in PD projects. Two important questions that the proposed study attempts to address are: Can we predict and identify the number of iterations in a product development flow? Can we provide managerial insights for a better control over iteration? The proposal introduces the concept of decision points and using this concept intends to develop metrics that can provide managerial insights into iteration predictability. By characterizing the product development flow as a network of decision points, the proposed research intends to delve further into iteration probability and attempts to provide more clarity.

Keywords: Decision Points, Iteration, Product Design, Rework.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1061561

References:

[1] Adams, R.S. Atman, C.J. 1999. Cognitive Processes in Iterative Design Behavior. Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session 11a6. November 10-13, San Juan de Puerto Rico.
[2] Adams, R.S. Atman, C.J. 2000. Characterizing Engineering Student Design Processes – An Illustration of Iteration. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Session 2330. June 18-21, St. Louis, MO.
[3] Adler. P. S., A. Mandelbaum, V. Nguyen, and E. Schwerer, “From project to process management: An empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time,” Mgt. Sci., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 458-484, 1995.
[4] Boehm, B. 2000. Spiral Development: Experience, Principles, and Refinements. CMU’s Software Engineering Institute, Special Report CMU/SEI-2000-SR-008. ng
[5] Browning T. R., “Sources of schedule risk in complex system development,” Syst. Eng., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–142, 1999.
[6] Browning, T. R. 2002. “Process integration using the design structure matrix”. Systems Engineering 5(3) 180-193.
[7] Browning, T.R., Eppinger, S.D., 2002. “Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development”. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 (4), 428-442.
[8] Burns, T., G. M. Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. Tavistock, London.
[9] Clark, K. B., T. Fujimoto 1991. Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
[10] David Wynn, Claudia Eckert and P John Clarkson 2005 - Abstracting Complexity for Design Planning - GIST Technical Report G2005-1, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
[11] Denker, S. Steward, D.V. Browning, T.R. 2001. Planning Concurrency and Managing Iterations in Projects. Project Management Journal. September. 32(3): 31-38
[12] Eckert, C.M., Clarkson, P.J., and Zanker, W., 2004. Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Research in Engineering Design, 15 (1), 1–21.
[13] Eppinger, Steven D., Daniel E. Whitney, Robert P. Smith, and David Gebala. “A Model-Based Method for Organizing Tasks in Product Development.” Research in Engineering Design. 1994, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1–13.
[14] Giovanni D’Avino, Paolo Dondo, Corrado lo Storto, Vincenzo Zezza, “Reducing Ambiguity and uncertainty during new product development in the automotive industry : A system dynamics-based modeling approach to support organizational change”
[15] Jeffrey W. Herrmann,, Linda C. Schmidt, – “Viewing Product Development as a decision production system” - Proceedings of DETC 2002 ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference Montreal, Canada, September 29-October 2, 2002
[16] K. B. Clark and S. C. Wheelwright, Managing New Product and Process Development. New York: Free Press, 1993.
[17] Osborne, Sean M., "Product Development Cycle Time Characterization through Modeling of Process Iteration", S.M. Thesis, M.I.T. Sloan School of Management, June 1993.
[18] P. Nightingale, “The product-process-organization relationship in complex development projects,” Res. Policy, vol. 29, pp. 913–930, 2000.
[19] Petroski. H, To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design. New York: St. Martin’s, 1985.
[20] Ramon Costa, Durward K. Sobek II – Iteration in Engineering Design: Inherent and Unavoidable or Product of choices made - Proceedings of DETC’03 ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference Chicago, Illinois USA, September 2-6, 2003
[21] Richard E. Fairley Mary Jane Willshire, “Iterative Rework: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly - Computer 2005 IEEE – Page – 34
[22] Robert P. Smith, Steven D. Eppinger, “A Predictive model of sequential iteration in Engineering Design”, Management Science, Vol. 43, No.8 August 1997, pg - 1104 -1120.
[23] S. Thomke and D. E. Bell, “Sequential testing in product development,” Management Sci., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 308–323, 2001.
[24] Safoutin M. J. and R. P. Smith, “The iterative component of design,” in IEEE Int. Eng. Management Conf., Vancouver, 1996, pp. 564–569.
[25] Singh K. J., J. W. Erkes, J. Czechowski, J. W. Lewis, and M. G. Issac, “DICE approach for reducing product development cycle,” in Worldwide Passenger Car Conf. Exposition, Dearborn, MI, 1992, pp. 141–150.
[26] Smith, R.P. Eppinger, S.D. 1997a. A Predictive Model of Sequential Iteration in Engineering Design. Management Science. August. 43(8): 1104-1120
[27] Smith. P, “Concurrent engineering teams,” in Field Guide to Project Management, D. Cleland, Ed. New York: Wiley, 1998.
[28] Sule Tash Pektas and Mustafa Pultar, “Modelling detailed information flows in building design with the parameter based design structure matrix” - Design Studies 27 (2006) 99 - 122
[29] Terwiesch.C and C. H. Loch,, “Managing the process of engineering change orders: The case of the climate control system in automobile development,” J. Product Innovation Mgt., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 160–172, 1999.
[30] Ulrich, K. Eppinger, S. 2000. Product Design and Development. 2nd Ed. Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston.
[31] Whitney D. E., “Designing the design process,” Res. Eng. Design, vol. 2, pp. 3–13, 1990.