Cognitive Virtual Exploration for Optimization Model Reduction
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32926
Cognitive Virtual Exploration for Optimization Model Reduction

Authors: Livier Serna, Xavier Fischer, Fouad Bennis


In this paper, a decision aid method for preoptimization is presented. The method is called “negotiation", and it is based on the identification, formulation, modeling and use of indicators defined as “negotiation indicators". These negotiation indicators are used to explore the solution space by means of a classbased approach. The classes are subdomains for the negotiation indicators domain. They represent equivalent cognitive solutions in terms of the negotiation indictors being used. By this method, we reduced the size of the solution space and the criteria, thus aiding the optimization methods. We present an example to show the method.

Keywords: Optimization Model Reduction, Pre-Optimization, Negotiation Process, Class-Making, Cognition Based VirtualExploration.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1406


[1] G. Pahl, W.Beitz, K. Wallace, L.T.M. Blessing, F. Bauert, Engineering Design. London, UK: Springer Verlat, 2005, ch. 3.
[2] B. Kirwan, A Guide to Task Analysis. Cumbria, UK: CRC Press, 1992 (abstract).
[3] K. Otto, K. Wood, Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall Press. 2001, ch. 5.
[4] J.A. Shupe, D. Muster, J.K. Allen, F. Mistree, "Decision-based design: Some Concepts and Research Issues", Expert Systems, Strategies and Solutions in Manufacturing Design and Planning, pp. 3-37, 1988.
[5] G. Hazelrigg, "A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design", ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 120, 1998.
[6] H.W. Stoll, Product Design Methods and Practices. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker Press, 1999, ch. 4.
[7] R.L. Keeney, H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press, 1993, ch. 5, 6.
[8] J.R. Hauser, G.L. Urban. "Assessment of Attribute Importance and Consumer Utility Functions: vonNeumann-Morgensten Theory Applied to Consumer Behaviour". Journal of Consumer Research vol. 5, March 1979, pp 251-262.
[9] J. Eliashberg. "Consumer Preference, Judgements: An Exposition with Empirical Applications." Management Science, vol. 25, January 1980, pp 60-76.
[10] J. VonNeumman, O. Morgenstern. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. New Jersey, USA: University Press, 1944.
[11] S. Pugh. Total Design: Integrated Methods for Succesful Product Engineering. Workingham, UK: Addison-Wesley, 1991.
[12] T. Saaty. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. New York, USA: McGraw- Hill, 1980.
[13] G. Taguchi, Introduction to Quality Engineering. Michigan, USA: American Supplier Institute, Inc., 1986.
[14] N. Suh, The principles of design. New York, USA: Oxford University Press, 1990
[15] J. Wang, J. Terpenny. "Interactive evolution solution synthesis in fuzzy based preliminary engineering design." Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 14, October 2003, pp 153-167.
[16] B. Jiang, C.H. Hsu. "Development of a fuzzy decision model for manufacturing evaluation." Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 14, October 2003, pp. 169-181.
[17] J. M. Mendel, H. Wu. "Uncertainty versus Choice in rule-based Fuzzy logic systems." Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1336-1341, May 2002.
[18] D. Scaravetti, J.P. Nadeau, P. Sebastian, J. Pailhes. "Aided decisionmaking for an embodiment design problem." International Conference on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, April 2004.
[19] A. Olewnik, K. Lewis. "On Validating Design Decision Methodologies." ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference, Sept. 2003.
[20] L.-K. Chan, M.-L. Wu. "Quality Function Deployment: A Literature review." European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 143, pp. 463- 497, January 2002.
[21] T.A. Bahill. "The preferred alternative in a trade-off study often depends on the technique used." IEEE International Conferenc on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 3, pp- 2556-2561, October, 1998.
[22] C. Eden, F. Ackermann. "The role of GDSS in scenario development and strategy making." String Processing and Information Retrieval Symposium, pp. 234-242, September, 1999.
[23] F.R. Fernandez, S. Nickel, J. Puerto, A.M. Rodriguez-Chia. "Robustness in the Pareo-solutions for the multi-criteria minisum location problem." Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, vol. 10, pp. 191-203, November, 2001.
[24] I.Y., Kim, O.L. Weck. "Adaptive weighted-sum method for bi-objective optimization." Journal of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 29, pp. 149-158, February, 2004.
[25] R.M. Smaling, O.L. de WECK. "Fuzzy Pareto Frontiers in Multidisciplinary System Architecture Analysis." 10thAIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, August, 2004.
[26] A. Gumani, S. Ferguson, J. Donndelinger. "Feasibility Assesement in preliminary Design using Pareto Sets." ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference, September, 2005.