Primary School Principles- Views about In-service Training Activities
Authors: Sadık Kartal
Abstract:
This study was carried out to determine the feedback from the primary school headmasters on in-service training activities. 384 primary school headmasters were asked to give feedback on the in-service training facilities organized by the Ministry of Education through an open –ended question. The study group was formed by 359 primary school headmasters who attended “Management Skills" seminars which were organized in March, April and May in the extent of 2006 In-service Training Facilities Plan by the Ministry of Education and were also volunteers to give feedback on the inservice training activities. The qualitative research method was used in the analysis of the data since the primary school headmasters gave written feedback on the in-service training activities. Having analyzed the feedback, certain categories were formed by coding it. Certain frequencies and percentages were determined according to the codes. It was made obvious that the primary school headmasters benefitted from those facilities by sharing their experiences, problems and their possible solutions mutually
Keywords: In-service training, primary school principles, educates.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1061212
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1248References:
[1] C. Ostroff & T. J. Rothausen, "The moderating effect of tenure in person-environment fit: A field study in educational organizations", Journal Of Occupational And Organizational Psychology,Vol 70, pp.173-188, 1997.
[2] I.E. Ba5aran, Yonetimde insan iliskileri: Yonetsel Davranıs, Ankara, 1989.
[3] G. Ishakoglu, Orgut-birey uyumunun saglanmasmda personel secimi ye sosyallesmenin onemi. Yapmlanmamıs doktora tezi. İzmir Dokuz Eylül Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 1998.
[4] D. C. Feldman, "A Socialization process that help new recruits succeed", in Perspectives on behavior in organization. J.R.Hackman, E.E.Lawler, L.W. Porter, Eds.,. Mc Graw-Hill Book Company, 1980, p. 170-178.
[5] H. Taymaz, Hizmet ici Egitim Kavramlar, ilkeler, Yontemler. Ankara: Pegem Yaynn, Yayin No:3, 1992.
[6] H, I. Yahn, "Hizmet ici egitim programlarının degerlendirilmesi", Milli Egitim Dergisi, 50, pp. 1-15, 2001.
[7] Z. Bursahoglu, Okul Yonetiminde Yeni Yapı Ve Davranıs. Ankara: Pegem A Yaymcihk, 2005.
[8] J.M. George, & G. R. Jones, Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior. Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, 1996.
[9] L. W. Porter, E. E. Lawler & J.R. Hackman, Behavior In Organizations (international student edition). Mc Graw- Hill International Book Company, 1981.
[10] H. Can, Organizasyon Ve Yonetim. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi, 1999.
[11] J.P. Wanous, Organizational Entry Recruitment, Selection, And Socialization Of Newcomers. Addison- Wesley Publishing Company, 1980.
[12] A. Balci, Orgutsel Sosyalleme: Kuram, Strateji Ve Taktikler. Ankara: Pegem A Yaymcihk, 2000.
[13] E. H. Schein, Orgut Psikolojisi (cev. M. Tosun). Ankara: TODAI Yarn', 1984.
[14] N. Karasar, Bilimsel Arastırma Yontemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayım Dagıtım, 2004.
[15] A. Balci, Sosyal Bilimlerde Arastırma: Yontem, Teknik ye ilkeler. Ankara, 1997.
[16] A. Ergin & S. cinkir, "Egitim yonetiminde kadınlar", Egitim Arastırmaları, 18, pp.84-96, 2005.
[17] A. Balci, Etkili Okul Ve Okul Geli5tirme, Ankara: Pegem A Yaymcihk, 2001.
[18] R. N. Lussier, Human Relations In Organizations- A Skill-Building Approach. Boston: Irwin, 1990.
[19] K.N. Wexley, & G.A. Yukl, Organizational Behavior and Personnel Psychology (Revised Edition). Illinois: Irwin, 1984.
[20] R. Pascale, "The paradox of "corporate culture" reconciling ourselves to socialization", California management Review, 17, 2, pp.26-41, 1985.
[21] V. celik, Okul Kulturü Ve Yonetimi, Ankara: Pegem A Yaymcihk, 2000.
[22] Milli Egitim Bakanligi, ilkogretim Okulu Müdürlerinin Görev Tanımı. 2508 Sayılı Tebligler Dergisi.
[23] O. Yuksel, insan Kaynaklerı Yonetimi, Ankara, 1997.