Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30172
Digital Paradoxes in Learning Theories

Authors: Marcello Bettoni

Abstract:

As a learning theory tries to borrow from science a framework to found its method, it shows paradoxes and paralysing contraddictions. This results, on one hand, from adopting a learning/teaching model as it were a mere “transfer of data" (mechanical learning approach), and on the other hand from borrowing the complexity theory (an indeterministic and non-linear model), that risks to vanish every educational effort. This work is aimed at describing existing criticism, unveiling the antinomic nature of such paradoxes, focussing on a view where neither the mechanical learning perspective nor the chaotic and nonlinear model can threaten and jeopardize the educational work. Author intends to go back over the steps that led to these paradoxes and to unveil their antinomic nature. Actually this could serve the purpose to explain some current misunderstandings about the real usefulness of Ict within the youth-s learning process and growth.

Keywords: Antinomy, complexity, Leibniz, paradox

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1061062

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 925

References:


[1] D. Hilbert, "The problems of mathematics", Second International Congress of Mathematicians, 1900, Paris
[2] S.C Kleene, "Turing-s analysis of computation, and major applications of it" in The Universal Turing Machine, A Half-Century Survey, Oxford UP.
[3] J.M Momina, J. Menenses, "Digital inequalities in children and young people: a Technological matter?" in New Millennium Learners Conference, Florence, 2007.
[4] J. Gleich, Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking Penguin 1987; S. Kauffman, At home in the universe. London: Penguin, 1995; I. Prigogine, I. Stengers,. Order out of chaos. New York: Bantam., 1984
[5] D. Loye, R. Eisler, Chaos and transformation: Implications of nonequilibrium theory for social science and society. Behavioral Science, 32, 53-65., 1987; R Port, T. van Gelder, Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995
[6] B. Harshbarger, Chaos, Complexity and Language Learning, Research Bulletin, 22, ICU, Tokio 2007
[7] I. Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Meiner Verlag. Hamburg 1998.