Impact of Fixation Time on Subjective Video Quality Metric: a New Proposal for Lossy Compression Impairment Assessment

Authors: M. G. Albanesi, R. Amadeo

Abstract:

In this paper, a new approach for quality assessment tasks in lossy compressed digital video is proposed. The research activity is based on the visual fixation data recorded by an eye tracker. The method involved both a new paradigm for subjective quality evaluation and the subsequent statistical analysis to match subjective scores provided by the observer to the data obtained from the eye tracker experiments. The study brings improvements to the state of the art, as it solves some problems highlighted in literature. The experiments prove that data obtained from an eye tracker can be used to classify videos according to the level of impairment due to compression. The paper presents the methodology, the experimental results and their interpretation. Conclusions suggest that the eye tracker can be useful in quality assessment, if data are collected and analyzed in a proper way.

Keywords: eye tracker, video compression, video qualityassessment, visual attention

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1060876

References:

[1] F. Lukas Z. Budrikis, Picture Quality Prediction Based on a Visual Model, IEEE Transaction on Communications, vol. 30, issue 7, 1982, pp. 1679-1691.
[2] N. Nill, A Visual Model Weighted Cosine Transform for Image Compression and Quality Assessment, IEEE Transaction on Communications, vol 33 Issue 6, 1985, pp. 551-557.
[3] R. Amadeo. Compressed Video Quality Assessment: from Subjective to Objective Metrics, Master thesis, University of Pavia, Engineering Faculty, 2011.
[4] U. Reiter, J. Korhonen, Comparing apples and oranges: subjective quality assessment of streamed video with different types of distortion, Proc. Of International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, 2009, pp. 127-132.
[5] Y. Ou, Y. Zhou, Y.Wang, Perceptual quality of video with frame rate variation: a subjective study, 2010, Proc. Of Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp- 2446-2449.
[6] A. K. Moorthy, K. Seshadrinathan, R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik, "Wireless video quality assessment: A study of subjective scores and objective algorithms". IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 20, no.4, April 2010, pp. 513-516.
[7] O. Le Meur, A. Ninassi, P. Le Callet, D. Barba, Overt visual attention for free-viewing and quality assessment tasks: Impact of the regions of interest on a video quality metric, Signal Processing Image Communication, 2010, vo. 25, pp- 547-548.
[8] H. R. Wu, K. R- Rao: Digital Video Image Quality and Perceptual Coding, Taylor and Francis ed. 2006, pp. 125-151.
[9] http://trace.eas.asu.edu/yuv/ (Video trace library of Arizona State University)
[10] ftp://ftp.tnt.uni-hannover.de/pub/svc/testsequences/ (Hannover Liebnitz University video library)
[11] http://media.xiph.org/video/derf/
[12] User Manual - Tobii Eye Tracker, Clearview analysis software - February 2006
[13] T. Tominaga, T. Hayashi, J. Okamoto, A. Takahashi, Performance comparisons of subjective quality assessment methods for mobile video, Proc. Of Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2010pp. 82-87.