Survey of Curriculum Quality of Postgraduate Studies of Insurance Management Field Case: University of Allameh Taba Tabaee
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
Survey of Curriculum Quality of Postgraduate Studies of Insurance Management Field Case: University of Allameh Taba Tabaee

Authors: F. Havas Beigi, E. Mohammadi, M.Vafaee Yeganeh

Abstract:

Curriculum is one of the most important inputs in higher education system and for knowing the strong and weak spots of it we need evaluation. The main purpose of this study was to survey of the curriculum quality of Insurance Management field. Case: University of Allameh Taba Tabaee(according to view point of students,alumni,employer and faculty members).Descriptive statistics (mean, tables, percentages, frequency distribution) and inferential statistics (CHI SQUARE) were used to analyze the data. Six criterions considered for the Quality of curriculum: objectives, content, teaching and learning methods, space and facilities, Time, assessment of learning. objectives, teaching and learning methods criterions was desirable level, content criteria was undesirable level, space and facilities, time and assessment of learning were rather desirable level. The quality of curriculum of insurance management field was relatively desirable level.

Keywords: Quality, curriculum, insurance management, higher education.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1060659

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1287

References:


[1] B.C. Sanyal , M.Martin, Quality assurance and the role of accreditation: an overview. GUNI Series on the Social Commitment of Universities, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
[2] A.Bazargan, Problems of organizing and reporting internal and external evaluation in developing countries : the case of Iran ,Journal of quality in higher education ,13, 3 , 207-214 ,2007.
[3] M.Prince , A .Stella, External quality assurance in higher education: making choices: paris : UNESCO: international institute for Educational planning, 2007.
[4] E.El- khawas , Accountability and quality assurance: new issues for academic inquiry.Springer International handbook of higher education, 18, 1, 23-37, 2006.
[5] K. Fat-hi Vajargah, Designing and accrediting "School Based Curriculum Need-Assessment" (SBCNA) model. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, No. 22, 2008.
[6] W .Malcolm, the design and evaluation of curriculum. Faculty of education, queen-s university, EDUC 800, 2005.
[7] P.Grossman, C.Thompson, Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2014- 2026, 2008.
[8] L. Cao, L. J.Nietfeld, Judgment of learning, monitoring accuracy, and Student performance in the classroom context. Current Issues in Education, 8(4), 2005.
[9] D.Andrew, C. D.Cobb, P. J. Giampietro, Verbal ability and teacher Effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education. 56(4), 343-354, 2005.
[10] A. Davise, j.s krajcik, Designing educative curriculum material to promote teacher learning .educational researcher.34 (3), 3-1, 2005.
[11] H. Al-Samadi , A. Najadat, The Role of Higher Education in the Economic Development of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan,Management Departmeent University of AL-Balqa Applied,Faculty of Ajloum Jordan, 2009.
[12] T. CeCilia, Quality in higher education: polices and practices,ahong kong prespective. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies,vol 4,NO 2, 2002 .
[13] l.Ralph, E,S kelly, and v.w, detlof, Evaluathng academic programs:withapplications to u.s.graduate decision science programs,operations research:seploct 2006:54,5:proquest computing pg.813, 2006.