Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of the Textile Firms Quoted in Istanbul Stock Exchange
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33104
Corporate Social Responsibility Practices of the Textile Firms Quoted in Istanbul Stock Exchange

Authors: Gulsevim Yumuk Gunay, Suleyman Gokhan Gunay

Abstract:

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be defined as the management of social, environmental, economical and ethical concepts and firms sensivities to the expectations of the social stakeholders. CSR is seen as an important competitive advantage in the textile sector because this sector has an important impact on the environment and it is labor extensive. Textile sector has a strong advantage when compared with other sectors in Turkey due to its low labor costs and abundancy of raw materials. Turkey was a producer and an exporter of cotton, and an importer of fiber, clothes and dresses until 1950s. After 1950s, Turkey has begun to export fiber, ready-made clothes and become one of the most important textile producers in the world recently. CSR practices of the textile firms that are quoted in Istanbul Stock Exchange and these firms sensivities to their internal and external stakeholders and environment will be presented in this study.

Keywords: corporate social responsibility, Istanbul Stock Exchange, textile sector, Turkey

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1060361

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2986

References:


[1] S. G. Gunay, Corporate Governance Theory: A Comparative Analysis of Stockholder and Stakeholder Governance Models. New York, Bloomington: iUniverse Inc. , 2008.
[2] http://www.kobitek.com/makale.php?id=134(September 2008)
[3] T. M. Jones, Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined, California Management Review, Vol. 22, pp. 59-67, 1980.
[4] K. D. Walters,Corporate social responsibility and political ideology, California Management Review, pp.40-51,1977.
[5] S. Wartick and P.Cochran, The evolution of the corporate social performance model, Academy of Management Review, pp. 758-769,1985.
[6] R. H. Frank, Melding sociology and economics: James Colemans foundations of social theory,.Journal of Economic Literature, pp. 147-170, 1992.
[7] M. Ayub, Trkiye Koordinatr ve Birlesmi Milletler Kalknma Program (UNDP), Trkiyede Sosyal Sorumluluk deerlendirme Raporu, Ankara, 2008.
[8] F. Bikmen, Corporate philanthropy in Turkey: Building on Tradition, Adapting to Change, SEAL-Social Economy and Law Project Journal Autumn, 2003.
[9] E. Scholes and D.Clutterbuck, Communication with stakeholders: An integrated approach, Long Range Planning, pp. 227-238.,1998 .
[10] M. D. Garcia, Trust and dialogue: Theoretical approaches to ethics auditing, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 57, pp. 209-219, 2005.
[11] D. Julius, Globalization and stakeholder conflicts: A corporate perspective, International Affairs, vol. 73, pp. 453-468, 1997.
[12] R. S. Moorthy, R. T. De George, T. Donaldson , W. J . Ellos, R. C. Solomon and R.B. Textor, Uncomprimising integrity: Motorolas global challenge, Illinois: Motorola University Press, 1998.
[13] J. E. Post, L. E. Preston and S. Sachs Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth, California: Stanford University Press. 2002.
[14] J. Elkington, Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21stCentury, U.S.: New Society Publishers. 1998 .
[15] Ostim website.2008. http://www.kssd.orgyindex.htmr
[16] O. Ergun, Avrupa Birliginde, Ekolojik Etiketler ve Ekolojik Tekstil rnleri, GEME, 5-14-18-21-22,http://www.foreigntrade.gov.tr/ead/DTDERGI/tem2001/tekstil.htm, kasm, 2006.
[17] Turkish Textile Employers Association website. http://www.tekstilisveren.org/content/view/409/41/, (November 2006)
[18] MPM, Sanayi letmelerinde evre Ynetim Sisteminin Kurulmas,MPM yaynlar, Ankara, 2000.
[19] International Organization for Standardization website. 2009. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_14000_essentials (January 2009)
[20] Standard Quality website. 2009. http://www.ohsas-18001-occupational-health-and-safety.com/what.htm (March 2009)
[21] Social Accountability International website.2009. http://www.sa-intl.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page. viewPage&pageID=473 (March 2009)
[22] Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia website. 2009. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SA8000 (April 2009)
[23] European Commission website. 2008. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/sme_ definition/sme_user _guide.pdf (September 2008)
[24] M. Tekin, Giriimcilik ve Kk letme Yneticilii. Konya: Gnay Ofset, 2006.
[25] P. Hawken, The Ecology of Commerce. London: Weidenfeld&Nicholson, 1993.
[26] D. Crowther and R. Jatana, Is CSR Protable?, Representations of Social Responsibility, vol.I, Edit by David Crowther, Renu Jatana, The ICFAI University Press. 2005.
[27] C. Caldwell and R. Karri, Organizational governance and ethical systems: A covenantal approach to building trust, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 5, pp. 249-259, 2005.
[28] O. Dincer, Stratejik Ynetim ve letme ve letme Politikas, 5. Bask,stanbul: Beta Basm, p. 155, 1998.
[29] I. O. Ertuna, Kapitalizmin son direnisi. stanbul: Alfa .Basm YaymDatm , , 2005.
[30] E. E. Arthur,The ethics of corporate governance, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 6, pp. 59-70, 1987.
[31] R. A. Buchholz, Toward a contemporary conceptual framework for stakeholder theory, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 58, pp. 137-148, 2005.