Fuzzy Clustering of Locations for Degree of Accident Proneness based on Vehicle User Perceptions
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33104
Fuzzy Clustering of Locations for Degree of Accident Proneness based on Vehicle User Perceptions

Authors: Jayanth Jacob, C. V. Hariharakrishnan, Suganthi L.

Abstract:

The rapid urbanization of cities has a bane in the form road accidents that cause extensive damage to life and limbs. A number of location based factors are enablers of road accidents in the city. The speed of travel of vehicles is non-uniform among locations within a city. In this study, the perception of vehicle users is captured on a 10-point rating scale regarding the degree of variation in speed of travel at chosen locations in the city. The average rating is used to cluster locations using fuzzy c-means clustering and classify them as low, moderate and high speed of travel locations. The high speed of travel locations can be classified proactively to ensure that accidents do not occur due to the speeding of vehicles at such locations. The advantage of fuzzy c-means clustering is that a location may be a part of more than one cluster to a varying degree and this gives a better picture about the location with respect to the characteristic (speed of travel) being studied.

Keywords: C-means clustering, Location Specific, Road Accidents.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1060299

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1845

References:


[1] Fang Clara Fang, Lily Elefteriadou, Kelly Klaver Pecheux and Martin T Pietrucha. (2003) Using Fuzzy Clustering of User Perceptions to Define Levels of Service a Signalized Intersections, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129(6), pp. 657- 663.
[2] Hauer E. (1992) Empirical bayes approach to the estimation of unsafety: the multivariate regression method, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 24(5), pp. 457-477
[3] Jayanth Jacob and Suganthi L, (2006) Identifying Accident causing Factors for different Vehicle User Categories (Unpublished).
[4] Narayanan R, Udayakumar R, Kumar K, and Subburaj L., (2003) Quantification of Congestion using Fuzzy Logic and Network Analysis using GIS, Map India Conference, www.gisdevelopment.net .
[5] Nicholson A.J. (1991) Understanding the stochastic nature of accident occurrence, Australian Road Research, Vol. 21 (1), pp. 30-39.
[6] Nikhil R.Pal, James C.Bezdek and Richard J. Hathaway (1996), "Sequential Competitive Learning and the fuzzy C-means Clustering Algorithms", Neural Networks, Vol 9, No 5, Pg 787-796, Pergamon, Elsevier.
[7] Rajiv Gupta and Deelesh Mandloi (2005) Evaluation of Accident Black Spots on Roads using Geographical Information Systems (GIS), The Geospatial Resource Portal.
[8] Sabey B.E., and Taylor H. (1980) The known risks we run: the highway, Societal risk assessment-how safe is safe enough, R.E Schwing and W.A Albers, cds., Plenum Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 43-63 .
[9] Tarek Sayed, Walid Abdelwahab and Frank Navin. (1995) Identifying Accident-Prone Locations using Fuzzy Pattern Recognition, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 121(4), pp. 352-358.
[10] Treat J.R. (1980) A study of pre-crash factors involved in traffic accidents, Rep., HSRI 10/11, Highway Safety Research Institute (HSRI), Ann Arbor, Michigan.
[11] Wright, C, Abbes, C.R, and Jarret D.F. (1988) Estimation the regression to the mean effect associated with road accident black spot treatment: towards a more realistic approach, Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol 3, pp.199-214
[12] Yi-Lang Chen. (2007) Driver personality characteristics related to selfreported accident involvement and mobile phone use while driving, Safety Science, Vol 45, pp. 823-831.