Virtual Reality Classrooms Strategies for Creating a Social Presence

Authors: Elizabeth M. Hodge, M.H.N. Tabrizi, Mary A. Farwell, Karl L. Wuensch

Abstract:

Delivering course material via a virtual environment is beneficial to today-s students because it offers the interactivity, real-time interaction and social presence that students of all ages have come to accept in our gaming rich community. It is essential that the Net Generation also known as Generation Why, have exposure to learning communities that encompass interactivity to form social and educational connections. As student and professor become interconnected through collaboration and interaction in a virtual learning space, relationships develop and students begin to take on an individual identity. With this in mind the research project was developed to investigate the use of virtual environments on student satisfaction and the effectiveness of course delivery. Furthermore, the project was designed to integrate both interactive (real-time) classes conducted in the Virtual Reality (VR) environment while also creating archived VR sessions for student use in retaining and reviewing course content.

Keywords: Virtual Reality, Social Presence, Virtual Environments, Course Delivery Methods.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1059837

References:

[1] Amon, T., & Valencic, V., (2000). VRML. Enhanced learning in biology and medicine. Future Generation Computer Systems. 17(1):1-6.
[2] Bannan-Ritland, B., Bragg, W. & Collins, M. Linking Theory, Educational Constructs, and Instructional Strategies in Web-based Course Development. Retrieved online 07/14/06 from http://www.virtual.gmu.edu/EDIT611/BannanWBC.pdf
[3] Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: a reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models. A new paradigm of instructional theory, 2. 269-292. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[4] Bossé, Michael J. & Rider, Robin L. (October, 2005). Investigating distance professional development: lessons learned from research. Published in the Proceedings of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Roanoke, VA, October 20-23.
[5] Cobb, P., Stephen, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10 (1&2), 113-163.
[6] Dede, C. (2004, September). Enabling distributed learning communities via emerging technologies - Part one. T.H.E. Journal, 32(2), 12-22. www.thejournal.com.
[7] Dickey M. D., (2003) Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance Education 24(1): 105-121.
[8] Foley, A. R. (2007). Distance education: Understandings of disability and the provision of access to content. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34, 1, 17-27.
[9] Garrison, R., Anderson, T. and Archer,W. (2000) Critical Inquiry in a Text-based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education, The Internet in Higher Education, 2, 2-3,, 87-105, (retrieved March 15, 2007)
[10] Hiemstra, R., and Poley, J. (2007). Lessons pertinent for teaching with computers. Clearing House, 80, 3, 144-148.
[11] Hodge, E., (2006). If you can't beat um...join um! The quest to create a social presence in student's lives. Submitted for publication.
[12] Hodge, E., Bosse, M., Faulconer, J., Fewell, M., (2006). International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning December 2006 5 Vol. 3. No. 12. Innovations in Distance Education. (1998). An emerging set of guiding principles and practices for the design and development of distance education. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved 01/22/07 from http://www.worldcampus.psu.edu/ide/docs/guiding_principles.pdf
[13] Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M., (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. (White Paper). MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved 06/01/07 from http://www.digitallearning.macfound.org/site/c.enJLKQNlFiG/b.210877 3/apps/nl/content2.asp?content_id=%7BCD911571-0240-4714-A93B- 1D0C07C7B6C1%7D¬oc=1
[14] Lave, J. & Wenger, W. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[15] Lefebvre H. (1991) The production of space. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
[16] Makoe, M. Q. (2006). South African distance students- accounts of learning in socio-cultural context: A habitus analysis. Race, Ethnicity & Education, 9, 4, 361-380.
[17] McPherson, M., & Baptista-Nunes, M., (2004). The failure of a virtual social space (VSS) designed to create a learning community: Lessons learned. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 305-321.
[18] Media Grid Initiative: Immersive Education (Boston College). Retrieved 06/05/07 at http://immersiveeducation.org/
[19] Russo, T., & Koesten, J. (2005). Prestige, Centrality, and Learning: A Social Network Analysis of an Online Class. Communication Education, 54(3), 254-261.
[20] Rossett, A. (2005). Moving Online. T+D, 59(2), 14-15.
[21] Rourk, W., (2000) Who benefits from learning with 3D models? the case of spatial ability Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22 (6), 392- 404.
[22] L. Rourke et al., "Assessing Social Presence in Asynchronous Textbased Computer Conferencing," Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2001, (retrieved March 15, 2007)
[23] V. Tinto, Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of College Attrition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987), as cited in Rourke et al., ibid.
[24] U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2000-2001 (NCES 2003-017), retrieved May 4, 2007 at http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=80
[25] Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher order psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[26] Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[27] Wang, A., & Newlin, M. (2001, August). Online Lectures: Benefits for the Virtual Classroom. T H E Journal, 29(1), 17.
[28] Winn, W. (1993). A Conceptual Basis for Educational Applications of Virtual Reality.Technical Report TR-93-9, Human Interface Technology Laboratory - University of Washington.
[29] Winn, W. 1997. Advantages of a Theory-Based Curriculum in Instructional Technology. Educational Technology, 97(1):34-41.
[30] Wise J M (1999) Culture and technology CULTSTUD-L Columns. Retrieved on 8/20/2006 from http://www.cas.usf.edu/communication/rodman/cultstud/columns/jw-24- 10-99.html
[31] Zuhairi, A., Wahyono, E., & Suratinah, S. (2006). The historical context, current development and future challenges of distance education in Indonesia. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 1, 95-101.