Creating Maintenance Cost Model for University Buildings
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33126
Creating Maintenance Cost Model for University Buildings

Authors: AbdulLateef A. Olanrewaju, Arazi Idrus, Mohd F. Khamidi

Abstract:

Maintenance costs incurred on building differs. The difference can be as results of the types, functions, age, building health index, size, form height, location and complexity of the building. These are contributing to the difficulty in maintenance development of deterministic maintenance cost model. This paper is concerns with reporting the preliminary findings on the creation of building maintenance cost distributions for universities in Malaysia. This study is triggered by the need to provide guides on maintenance costs distributions for decision making. For this purpose, a survey questionnaire was conducted to investigate the distribution of maintenance costs in the universities. Altogether, responses were received from twenty universities comprising both private and publicly owned. The research found that engineering services, roofing and finishes were the elements contributing the larger segment of the maintenance costs. Furthermore, the study indicates the significance of maintenance cost distribution as decision making tool towards maintenance management.

Keywords: Performance matrix, university buildings, costmodel, Malaysia

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1059821

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2044

References:


[1] A. A. Olanrewaju, M. F. Khamidi and A. Idrus, "Development of Definitive Maintenance Performance Matrix for University-s Maintenance Organizations". In Proceedings of International Economic and Business Management Conference 2010 (IEBMC 2010). Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Pahang. 3rd - 24th November ,2010.
[2] I. F. Price, F. Matzdorf, L. Smith, and H. Agahi, "The impact of facilities on the student choice of university". Facilities. Volume 21 Number 10, pp. 212 -222, 2003.
[3] M. Leung and I. Fung, "Enhancement of classroom facilities of primary schools and its impact on learning behaviors of students". Facilities, Vol. 23. No. 13 / 14, pp. 585- 594, 2005
[4] S. Lavy, and D. L. Bilbo, "Facilities maintenance management in large public schools", Texas. Facilities, vol. 27. No 1 / 2 pp5-20, 2009)
[5] S. Rawlinson and L. Brett, "Cost model universities". Building Magazine. Available at http://www.building.co.uk/data/cost-modeluniversities/ 3143057.article. Accessed on 15 June 2010, 2009
[6] F. Booty, (edr) "Facilities Management", 3rd Edition, Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann, 2006.
[7] E. K. Zavadskas and T. Vilutiene, "A multiple evaluation of multifamily apartment block-s maintenance contractors: I Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and the determination of its selection criteria. Journal of Building and Environment. 41 pp..621 -632, 2006.
[8] A. Lewis, D. Riley, D. and A. Elmualim, "Defining High Performance Buildings for Operations and Maintenance. International Journal of Facility Management. Vol.1, No.2 - November, 2010
[9] A. A. Olanrewaju, "Case for alternative approach to building maintenance management of public universities. Journal of Building Appraisal, 2010, Issue 5, pp201-212.
[10] R. Kirkham, "Ferry and Brandon-s cost planning of buildings". 8th Edition. UK: Blackwell Publishing Limited, 2007.
[11] C. Marsh, "Building services procurement", 1st Edition. UK: Spon Press,. 2003.