Clinical and Methodological Issues in the Research on the Rape Myth

Authors: Ana Pauna, Zbigniew Pleszewski

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to revisit the concept of rape as represented by professionals in the literature as well as its perception (beliefs and attitudes) in the population at large and to propose methodological improvements to its measurement tool. Rape is a serious crime threatening its victim-s physical and mental health and integrity; and as such is legally prosecuted in all modern societies. The problem is not in accepting or rejecting rape as a criminal act, but rather in the vagueness of its interpretations and “justifications" maintained in the mentality of modern societies - known in the literature as the phenomenon of "rape-myth". The rapemyth can be studied from different perspectives: criminology, sociology, ethics, medicine and psychology. Its investigation requires rigorous scientific objectivity, free of passion (victims of rape are at risk of emotional bias), free of activism (social activists, even if wellintentioned are also biased), free of any pre-emptive assumptions or prejudices. To apply a rigorous scientific procedure, we need a solid, valid and reliable measurement. Rape is a form of heterosexual or homosexual aggression, violently forcing the victim to give-in in the sexual activity of the aggressor against her/his will. Human beings always try to “understand" or find a reason justifying their acts. Psychological literature provides multiple clinical and experimental examples of it; just to mention the famous studies by Milgram on the level of electroshock delivered by the “teacher" towards the “learner" if “scientifically justifiable" or the studies on the behavior of “prisoners" and the “guards" and many other experiments and field observations. Sigmund Freud presented the phenomenon of unconscious justification and called it rationalization. The multiple justifications, rationalizations and repeated opinions about sexual behavior contribute to a myth maintained in the society. What kind of “rationale" our societies apply to “understand" the non-consensual sexual behavior? There are many, just to mention few: • Sex is a ludistic activity for both participants, therefore – even if not consented – it should bring pleasure to both. • Everybody wants sex, but only men are allowed to manifest it openly while women have to pretend the opposite, thus men have to initiate sexual behavior and women would follow. • A person who strongly needs sex is free to manifest it and struggle to get it; the person who doesn-t want it must not reveal her/his sexual attraction and avoid risky situations; otherwise she/he is perceived as a promiscuous seducer. • A person who doesn-t fight against the sexual initiator unconsciously accepts the rape (does it explain why homosexual rapes are reported less frequently than rapes against women?). • Women who are raped deserve it because their wardrobe is very revealing and seducing and they ''willingly'' go to highly risky places (alleys, dark roads, etc.). • Men need to ventilate their sexual energy and if they are deprived of a partner their urge to have sex is difficult to control. • Men are supposed to initiate and insist even by force to have sex (their testosterone makes them both sexual and aggressive). The paper overviews numerous cultural beliefs about masculine versus feminine behavior and their impact on the “rape myth".

Keywords: Rape Myth components, psycho-social factors, testing, Likert-type scale

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1332342

References:

[1] M. R. Burt, "Cultural myths and supports for rape," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 38, no.2, pp. 217 - 230, 1980.
[2] S. M. Domalewski, "Rape myth acceptance: changing attitudes through the use of popular movies," National Undergraduate Research Clearinghouse, vol. 2, 1999.
[3] J. Doe, "The ultimate rape victim," Open Boundaries: A Canadian Women-s Studies Reader, Toronto, Pearson Education Canada, pp. 216- 222, 2008.
[4] P. Chiroro, G. Bohner, G. T. Viki, C.O.I. Jarvis, "Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity: expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations," Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol.19, no.4, pp. 427- 442, 2004.
[5] P. Sussenbach, G. Bohner, "Acceptance of sexual aggression myths in a representative sample of German residents," Aggressive Behavior, vol. 37, pp.374-385, 2011.
[6] L. A. Paul, M. J. Gray, J. D. Elhai, J. L. Davis, "Perceptions of peer rape myth acceptance and disclosure in a sample of college sexual assault survivors", Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 231-241, 2009.
[7] E. Suarez, T. M. Gadalla, "Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths," Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2010-2035, 2010.
[8] K. R. Murphy, C. O. Davidshofer, Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Print, 2005.
[9] C. Ferro, J. Cermele, A. Saltzman, "Current perceptions of marital rape: some good and not-so-good news," Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 764-779, 2008.
[10] H. Gerger, H. Kley, G. Bohner, F. Siebler, "The Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale: Development and validation in German and English," Aggressive Behavior, vol. 33, pp. 422-440, 2007.
[11] D. L. Payne, K. A. Lonsway, L. F. Fitzgerald, "Rape Myth Acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale," Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 33, pp. 27-68, 1999.