Study on the Effect of Sulphur, Glucose, Nitrogen and Plant Residues on the Immobilization of Sulphate-S in Soil
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
Study on the Effect of Sulphur, Glucose, Nitrogen and Plant Residues on the Immobilization of Sulphate-S in Soil

Authors: S. Shahsavani, A. Gholami

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the relationship between the sulphur (S), glucose (G), nitrogen (N) and plant residues (st), sulphur immobilization and microbial transformation were monitored in five soil samples from 0-30 cm of Bastam farmers fields of Shahrood area following 11 treatments with different levels of Sulphur (S), glucose (G), N and plant residues (wheat straw) in a randomized block design with three replications and incubated over 20, 45 and 60 days, the immobilization of SO4 -2-S presented as a percentage of that added, was inversely related to its addition rate. Additions of glucose and plant residues increased with the C-to-S ratio of the added amendments, irrespective of their origins (glucose and plant residues). In the presence of C sources (glucose or plant residues). N significantly increased the immobilization of SO4 -2-S, whilst the effect of N was insignificant in the absence of a C amendment. In first few days the amounts of added SO4 -2-S immobilized were linearly correlated with the amounts of added S recovered in the soil microbial biomass. With further incubation the proportions of immobilized SO4 -2-S remaining as biomass-S decreased. Decrease in biomass-S was thought to be due to the conversion of biomass-S into soil organic-S. Glucose addition increased the immobilization (microbial utilization and incorporation into the soil organic matter) of native soil SO4 -2-S. However, N addition enhance the mineralization of soil organic-S, increasing the concentration of SO4 - 2-S in soil.

Keywords: Immobilization, microbial biomass, sulphur, nitrogen, glucose.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1332238

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1441

References:


[1] S.Bhupinderpal., Z. Rengel and J.W. Bowden, Carbon, nitrogen and sulphur cycling following incorporation of canola residue of different sizes into a nutrient-poor sandy soil. Biology and Biochemistry., Vol. 38, pp.32-42. 2006.
[2] H.Chowdhury., K.M. Kouno, T. AndoCritical sulphur concentration and sulphur requirement of microbial biomass in a glucose and celluloseamemded regosol. Biol. Fertil. Soils ., Vol. 32, pp. 310-317. 2000.
[3] E.Eriksen, Gross sulphur mineralization-immobilization turnover in soil amended with plant residues. Soil biology and Biochemistry. Vol. 37, pp. 2216-2224. 2005.
[4] A.Ghani, R.G. McLarn, and R.S. Swift, The incorporation and transformations of 35S in soil: Effects of soil conditioning and glucose or sulphate additions. Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 2, pp. 327-335 .1993.
[5] Massoumi, A. and A. H. Cornfield, A rapid method for determinating sulphate in water extracts of soils. Analyst, London. Vol. 88, pp. 321- 322. 1963.
[6] A.G.O-Donnell., J. Wu, and J.K. Syers, Sulphate-S amendments in soil and their effects on the transformation of soil sulphur.Soil Biology and Biochemistry. Vol 26, pp. 1507-1514. 1994.
[7] T.Pennanen, Caul, S., Daniell, J.J., Griffiths, B.S., Ritz, K, and R.E., Wheatley, Community-level responses of metabolically active soil micro-organism to the quantity and quality of substrate inputs. Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 36, pp. 841-848 .2004.
[8] Vong, P.C. S., Piutti, S.S Deschaumes, E, Benizri and A. Guckert, Sulphur immobilization and arylsulphatase activity in two calcareous arable and fallow soils as affected by glucose additions. Geoderma.Vol. 148, pp. 79-84 .2008.
[9] J.Wu, AG O'Donnell, JK SyersMicrobial growth and sulphur immobilization following the incorporation of plant residues into soil. Soil Biol. Bioch ., Vol. 25, pp.1567-1573. 1993.
[10] J.Wu, D. O- Donnell, A.G, Z. L. He, and J. K. Syers, Fumigationextraction method for the measurement of soil microbial biomass-S. Soil Biol. Biochem.,Vol. 26: pp 117-125. 1994.