Structure of Doctoral Students- Research Competences in Sustainability Context

Authors: I. Bolgzda, E. Olehnovica

Abstract:

Qualification of doctoral students- and the candidates for a scientific degree is evaluated by the ability to solve scientific ideas in an innovative way, consequently, being a potential of research and science they play a significant role in the sustainability context of the society. The article deals with the analysis of the results of the pilot project, the aim of which has been to study the structure of doctoral students- research competences in the sustainability context. With the existance of variety of theories on research competence development, their analysis focuses on the attained aim approach. Three competence groups have been identified in this study: informative, communicative and instrumental. Within the study the doctoral students and candidates for a scientific degree (N=64) made their self-assessment of research competences. The study results depict their present research competence development level and its dynamics according to the aim to attain.

Keywords: competence structure, doctoral students, researchactivity, sustainability.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1331677

References:

[1] G.Cheetham, G.Chivers, "The reflective (and competent) practitioner: a model of professional competence which seeks to harmonise the reflective ractitioner and competence-based approaches", Journal of European Industrial Training, vol.22, no.7, pp. 267 - 276,1998.
[2] F.O.Delamare Le Deist&J. Winterton, "What Is Competence?", Human Resource Development International, vol.8, no.1, pp. 27-46, Taylor & Francis Group Ltd, 2005.
[3] H.Gardner, Creating Minds. New York: Basic Books,1993.
[4] P.Hodkinson, M.Issitt, The Challenge of Competence.London:Cassell Education, 1995.
[5] Hsing-fen Leea,M.Miozzoa,P.Laredob, "Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university", Research Policy, vol.39, pp. 869-881, 2010, www.elsevier.com/locate/respol (2011.02.02).
[6] V.J.Janesik, Intuition and Creativity: A Pas de Deux for Qualitative Researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, vol.7, no, 5, 2001.
[7] A.F.Osborn, Applied Imagination. New York: Scribner-s, 1953.
[8] G.A.Straka, Measurement and evaluation of competence. www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/BgR1_Straka.pdf (2011.15.01).
[9] Tuning _Competence_Russion_version 3: pp.20.http://www.tuning.unideusto.org/tuningeu/index.php?option=cont ent&task=view&id=173
[10] F.E. Weinert, Concept of competence: a conceptual clarification, in: D. S. Rychen and L. H., 2001.