A Cognitive Architectural Approach to the Institutional Roles of Agent Societies

Authors: Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa

Abstract:

This paper concerns a formal model to help the simulation of agent societies where institutional roles and institutional links can be specified operationally. That is, this paper concerns institutional roles that can be specified in terms of a minimal behavioral capability that an agent should have in order to enact that role and, thus, to perform the set of institutional functions that role is responsible for. Correspondingly, the paper concerns institutional links that can be specified in terms of a minimal interactional capability that two agents should have in order to, while enacting the two institutional roles that are linked by that institutional link, perform for each other the institutional functions supported by that institutional link. The paper proposes a cognitive architecture approach to institutional roles and institutional links, that is, an approach in which a institutional role is seen as an abstract cognitive architecture that should be implemented by any concrete agent (or set of concrete agents) that enacts the institutional role, and in which institutional links are seen as interactions between the two abstract cognitive agents that model the two linked institutional roles. We introduce a cognitive architecture for such purpose, called the Institutional BCC (IBCC) model, which lifts Yoav Shoham-s BCC (Beliefs-Capabilities-Commitments) agent architecture to social contexts. We show how the resulting model can be taken as a means for a cognitive architecture account of institutional roles and institutional links of agent societies. Finally, we present an example of a generic scheme for certain fragments of the social organization of agent societies, where institutional roles and institutional links are given in terms of the model.

Keywords: Simulation of agent societies, institutional roles, cognitive architecture of institutional roles.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1331579

References:

[1] Matteo Baldoni, Guido Boella, and Leendert van der Torre. Relationships meet their roles in object oriented programming. In F. Arbab and M. Sirjani, editors, FSEN 2007 - International Symposium on Fundamentals of Software Engineering. Springer (LNCS.
[2] Matteo Baldoni, Guido Boella, and Leendert van der Torre. Interaction between objects in powerjava. Journal of Object Tecnhology, 2(2), 2003.
[3] Cristiano Castelfranchi. Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In Victor Lesser and Les Gasser, editors, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems - ICMAS 95, pages 41-48, Cambridge, 1995. MIT Press.
[4] Cristiano Castelfranchi. Formalising the informal? dynamic social order, bottom-up control, and spontaneous normative relations. Journal of Applied Logic, 1(1):47-92, 2003.
[5] Cristiano Castelfranchi and Rino Falcone. From task delegation to role delegation. In AI*IA 97: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS 1321, pages 278-289. Springer, Berlin, 1997.
[6] James S. Coleman. Foundations of Social Theory. Havard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994.
[7] Ant├┤nio Carlos da Rocha Costa and Gra├ºaliz Pereira Dimuro. Introducing service schemes and systems organization in the theory of interactive computation. In Arnold Beckmann, Costas Dimitracopoulos, and Benedikt Löwe, editors, Logic and Theory of Algorithms, Fourth Conference on Computability in Europe, CiE 2008, pages 87-96, Athens, 2008.
[8] Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa and Graçaliz Pereira Dimuro. Semantical concepts for a formal structural dynamics of situated multiagent systems. In J. Sichman, P. Noriega, J. Padget, and Norms in Agent Systems III, number 4870 in LNAI, pages 139-154. Springer, Berlin, 2008.
[9] Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa and Graçaliz Pereira Dimuro. Introducing social groups and group exchanges in the PopOrg model. In Proceedings of AAMAS 2009, volume 1, pages 1297-1298, Budapest, 2009. IFAAMAS.
[10] Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa and Graçaliz Pereira Dimuro. A minimal dynamical organization model. In V. Dignum, editor, Multi-Agent Systems: Semantics and Dynamics of Organizational Models, pages 419-445. IGI Global, Hershey, 2009.
[11] Antônio Carlos da Rocha Costa and Graçaliz Pereira Dimuro. On the interactional account of the social functions of agent societies. In Proceedings of the BWSS 2010 - 2nd Brazilian Workshop on Social Simulation, São Bernando do Campo, 2010. SBC - Sociedade Brasileira de Computação.
[12] Virginia Dignum, editor. Multi-Agent Systems - Semantics and Dynamics of Organizational Models. IGI Global, Hershey, 2009.
[13] Jomi F. H├╝bner, Jaime S. Sichman, and Olivier Boissier. Developing organised multi-agent systems using the MOISE+ model: Programming issues at the system and agent levels. International Journal of Agent- Oriented Software Engineering, 1(3-4):370-395, 2007.
[14] Carl Hewitt. Viewing control structures as patterns of passing messages. Artificial Intelligence, 8(3), June 1977.
[15] John Laird, Paul Rosenbloom, and Allen Newell. Soar: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33(1):1-64, September 1987.
[16] Bronislaw Malinowski. A Scientific Theory of Culture, and other essays. The University of North Carolina Press, 1944.
[17] Pablo Noriega, Carles Sierra, and Juan Rodríguez. The Fishmarket Project. Reflections on agent-mediated institutions for trustworthy ecommerce. In Proc. Work. Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce, Intl. Conf. Electronic Commerce, Seoul, 1998.
[18] Carl Adam Petri. Introduction to Net Theory. In W. Brauer, editor, Net Theory and Applications, number 84 in LNCS, pages 1-19. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1980.
[19] Anand S. Rao and Michael P. Georgeff. Bdi agents: from theory to practice. In Proceedings of ICMAS 95, pages 312-319, San Francisco, June 1995.
[20] W. Richard Scott. Institutions and Organizations - Ideas and Interests. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, 2008.
[21] John R. Searle. The Construction of Social Reality. The Free Press, New York, 1995.
[22] Yoav Shoham. Agent oriented programming. Artificial Intelligence, 60(1):51-92, 1993.
[23] Munindar P. Singh. An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: Toward a unification of normative concepts. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7(1):97-113, 1999.
[24] Luca Tummolini and Cristiano Castelfranchi. The cognitive and behavioral mediation of institutions: Towards an account of institutional actions. Cognitive Systems Research, 7:307-326, 2006.
[25] Javier Vazquez-Salceda, Huib Aldewereld, and Frank Dignum. Norms in multiagent systems: some implementation guidelines. In Second European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 737-748, Barcelona, 2004.
[26] Eric Werner. Toward a theory of communication and cooperation for multiagent planning. In Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, pages 129-143. Morgan-Kaufman, 1988.