Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31103
Performance Evaluation Standards and Innovation: An Empirical Investigation

Authors: F. Apaydın


In this empirical research, how marketing managers evaluate their firms- performances and decide to make innovation is examined. They use some standards which are past performance of the firm, target performance of the firm, competitor performance, and average performance of the industry to compare and evaluate the firms- performances. It is hypothesized that marketing managers and owners of the firm compare the firms- current performance with these four standards at the same time to decide when to make innovation relating to any aspects of the firm, either management style or products. Relationship between the comparison of the firm-s performance with these standards and innovation are searched in the same regression model. The results of the regression analysis are discussed and some recommendations are made for future studies and applicants.

Keywords: Innovation, performance evaluation standards

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1189


[1] B. S. Chakravarty. Measuring Strategic Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7(5), 1986, pp. 437-458.
[2] S. Zou and T. Cavusgil. The GMS: A Broad Conceptualization of Global Marketing Strategy and Its Effect on Firm Performance, 66(4), 2002, pp. 40-57.
[3] M. J. Epstein & M. Roy. Evaluating and Monitoring CEO Performance: Evidence from US Compensation Committee Reports. Corporate Governance, 5(4), 2005, pp. 75-88.
[4] A. M. Pelham & P. Lieh. Differences between Presidents- and Sales Managers- Perceptions of the Industry Environment and Firm Strategy in Small Industrial Firms: Relationship to Performance Satisfaction. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 2004, pp. 174-189.
[5] H. Tekin. (1993). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. İstanbul: Yargı Yayınevi.
[6] A. K. Smith & R. N. Bolton. The Effect of Customers- Emotional Responses to Service Failures on Their Recovery Effort Evaluations and Satisfaction Judgments. Academy of Marketing Science, 30(1), 2002, pp. 5-23.
[7] J. Wirtz & A. Mattila. Exploring the Role of Alternative Perceived Performance Measures and Needs-congruency in the Consumer Satisfaction Process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(3), 2001, pp. 181-192.
[8] M. Kennerley & A. Neely. Measuring Performance in a Changing Business Environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(2), 2003, pp. 213-229.
[9] L. J. Bourgeois III. Performance and Consensus. Strategic Marketing Journal, 1(3), 1980, pp. 227-248.
[10] A. Co┼ƒkun. STK-lar─▒n Stratejik Performans Yönetiminde Yeni Bir Yakla┼ƒ─▒m: Performans Karnesi. Sivil Toplum, 4(15), 2006, pp. 103- 117.
[11] J. M. Geringer & L. Hebert. Measuring Performance on Their International Joint Ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 1991, pp. 249-264.
[12] W. J.Johnston & K. Kim. Performance, Attribution, and Expectancy Linkages in Personal Selling. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1994, pp. 68-81.
[13] H. R. Greve. Performance, Aspirations, and Risky Organizational Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 1998, pp. 58-86.
[14] M. C. Kernan & R. G. Lord. An Application of Control Theory to Understanding the Relationship between Performance and Satisfaction. Human Performance, 4(3), 1991, pp. 173-185.
[15] K. Matsuno and T. M. John. The Effects of Strategy Type on the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 2000, pp. 1-16.
[16] W. K. Brooks & G. D. Coleman. Evaluating Key Performance Indicators Used to Drive Contractor Behavior at AEDCQ Engineering. Management Journal, 15(4), 2003, 24-39.
[17] N. F. Piercy, A. Kaleka, & C. S. Katsikes. Sources of Competitive Advantage in High Performing Exporting Companies. Journal of World Business, 33(4), 1998, pp. 378-393.
[18] G. S. Hansen & B. Wernerfelt. Determinants of Firm Performance: The Relative Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10(5), 1989, 399-411.
[19] G. G. Dess & R. B. Robinson. Measuring Organizational Performance in the Absence of Objective Measures: The Case of the Privately-held Firm and Conglomerate Business Unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 1984, pp. 265-273.
[20] J. K. Han, K. Namwoon, and K. S. Rajendra. Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 1998, pp. 30-45.
[21] M. Arndt and B. Bigelow. Presenting Structural Innovation in an Institutional Environment: Hospitals- Use of Impression Management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 2000, pp. 494-522.
[22] L. G. Cooper. Strategic Marketing Planning for Radically New Products. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 2000, pp. 1-16.
[23] E. Sivadas and F.R. Dwyer. An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliancebased Processes. Journal of Marketing, 64(1), 2000, pp. 31-49.
[24] R. F. Hurley, G. Tomas, and M. Hult. Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 1998, pp. 42-54.
[25] H. R. Greve and A. Taylor. Innovations as Catalysts for Organizational Change: Shifts in Organizational Cognition and Search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 2000, pp. 54-80.
[26] D. Lindsley, D. J. Brass, and J. B. Thomas. Efficacy- performance Spirals: A Multi-level Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 1995, pp. 645-678.
[27] L. E. Brouthers & K. Xu. Product Stereotypes, Strategy and Performance Satisfaction: The Case of Chinese Exporters. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(4), 2002, pp. 657-678.
[28] D. Miller. Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 1987, pp. 7-32.
[29] D. R. Denison. Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: Wiley, 1990.