Housing Defect of Newly Completed House: An Analysis Using Condition Survey Protocol (CSP) 1 Matrix

Authors: I. Ismail, A.I. Che-Ani, N.M. Tawil, H. Yahaya, M.Z. Abd-Razak

Abstract:

Housing is a basic human right. The provision of new house shall be free from any defects, even for the defects that people do normally considered as 'cosmetic defects'. This paper studies about the building defects of newly completed house of 72 unit of double-storey terraced located in Bangi, Selangor. The building survey implemented using protocol 1 (visual inspection). As for new house, the survey work is very stringent in determining the defects condition and priority. Survey and reporting procedure is carried out based on CSP1 Matrix that involved scoring system, photographs and plan tagging. The analysis is done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The finding reveals that there are 2119 defects recorded in 72 terraced houses. The cumulative score obtained was 27644 while the overall rating is 13.05. These results indicate that the construction quality of the newly terraced houses is low and not up to an acceptable standard as the new house should be.

Keywords: terraced houses, building defects, construction, CSP1 Matrix, Malaysia.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1331405

References:

[1] Jamilus Hussein, Zuhairi Abdul Hamid & Mohd. Khairolden Ghani. 2009. Sustainable Construction within the Built Environment: Malaysian Construction Industry Initiatives. The 11th International Surveyors- Congress. Plenary Session III - Paper 11. Crowne Plaza Mutiara Hotel, Kuala Lumpur. 18-19 June 2009.
[2] Nurizan Yahaya. 1998. Kualiti Perumahan dan Kualiti Hidup. Analisis. 5 (1&2):133-149.
[3] Ad Straub. 2009. Dutch Standard for Condition Assessment of Building. Structural Survey, Vol 27. Iss 1. pp.23-35.
[4] Zhang, Z.H., Wu, X., Hui, X.M. & Zhi, Y. 2004. BEPAS - A Life Cyle Building Environment Performances Asessment Model. Building and Environment. 41:669-675.
[5] Josephon, P.E. & Hammarlund, Y. 1999. The Causes and Costs of Defects in Construction: A Study of Seven Building Projects. Automation in Construction. 8: 681-687.
[6] Tam CM, Deng ZM, Xeng SX, Ho CS. 2000. Performances Of Assessment Scoring System for Public Housing Construction for Quality Improvement in Hong Kong (PASS). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. Vol. 17. Iss: 4/5. pp.467 - 478.
[7] Crosby, P.B. (1979). Quality is Free. New York: McGraw-Hill
[8] Juran, J. 1989. Leadership for Quality. An Executive Handbook. Free Press. New York.
[9] Aynur Kazaz, M.Talat Birgonul. 2005. The Evidence of Poor Quality in High-rise and Medium Rise Housing Unit: A Case Study of Mass Housing Projects in Turkey. Building and Environment. Vol. 40. Iss. 11. Pp.1548-1556
[10] Yuvabalan A/L Govindasamy. 2005. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penyenggaraan Di Peringkat Rekabantuk. Dissertation. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.
[11] Reese, C.D. 2004. Office Building Safety and Health. CRC Press. Florida, USA. http://www.scribd.com/doc/53152787/Office-Building- Safety-and-Health
[12] Zuriani Md. Ali. 2003. Pengkelasan Kecacatan Bangunan Pada Bangunan Pangsapuri Kuarters Kerajaan Presint 9, Putrajaya. Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Jangka Pendek 2003, Universiti Malaya 11 dan 12 Mac 2003. Paper No: 9.
[13] Mohd Zaki Mokhtar. 2006. Kerosakan dan Kemerosotan Struktur Konkrit di Malaysia. Dissertation. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Skudai.
[14] Ahmad Ramly. 2004. Panduan Kerja-kerja Pemeriksaan Kecacatan Bangunan. Building & Urban Development Institute. Selangor.
[15] Che-Ani A.I., Tazilan A.S.M., Kosman K.A. 2011. The Development of a Condition Survey Protocol Matrix.Structural Survey. 29(1):35-45.