Why Are Entrepreneurs Resistant to E-tools?

Authors: D. Ščeulovs, E. Gaile-Sarkane

Abstract:

Latvia is the fourth in the world by means of broadband internet speed. The total number of internet users in Latvia exceeds 70% of its population. The number of active mailboxes of the local internet e-mail service Inbox.lv accounts for 68% of the population and 97.6% of the total number of internet users. The Latvian portal Draugiem.lv is a phenomenon of social media, because 58.4 % of the population and 83.5% of internet users use it. A majority of Latvian company profiles are available on social networks, the most popular being Twitter.com. These and other parameters prove the fact consumers and companies are actively using the Internet. 

However, after the authors in a number of studies analyzed how enterprises are employing the e-environment, namely, e-environment tools, they arrived to the conclusions that are not as flattering as the aforementioned statistics. There is an obvious contradiction between the statistical data and the actual studies. As a result, the authors have posed a question: Why are entrepreneurs resistant to e-tools? In order to answer this question, the authors have addressed the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The authors analyzed each phase and determined several factors affecting the use of e-environment, reaching the main conclusion that entrepreneurs do not have a sufficient level of e-literacy (digital literacy). 

The authors employ well-established quantitative and qualitative methods of research: grouping, analysis, statistic method, factor analysis in SPSS 20  environment etc. 

The theoretical and methodological background of the research is formed by, scientific researches and publications, that from the mass media and professional literature, statistical information from legal institutions as well as information collected by the author during the survey.

Keywords: E-environment, e-environment tools, technology acceptance model, factors.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1331365

References:

[1] Technologies and Internet, Tvnet.lv homepage, http://www.tvnet.lv/tehnologijas/internets/408529latvija_4_vieta_pasaul e_pec_platjoslas_interneta_atruma
[2] Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia home page, http://data.csb.gov.lv/Dialog/Saveshow.asp
[3] Latvian Social Internet Network Draugiem.lv Statistics, http://draugiem.lv/statistika
[4] The Web Information Company Alexa homepage, http://alexa.com
[5] Diena.lv, Survey: Twitter getting more popular than draugiem.lv, http://www.diena.lv/sabiedriba/politika/petijums-twitter-latvija-klustpopularaks- par-draugiem-lv-762852
[6] D.Ščeulovs, E.Gaile-Sarkane, “Electronic tools for company’s presence, identification and marketing in e-environment: theory and practice,” Economics and Management, vol. 15. pp. 775-782, 2010.
[7] D.Ščeulovs, E.Gaile-Sarkane. “Identification of factors affecting consumer habits in the e-environment,” Business and Management–2010 Selected papers (Book style). Vilnius: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2010, pp 965-971.
[8] D.Ščeulovs, “Internet marketing strategies for small and medium enterprises,” New directions in economics” (Book style). Cracow: Publikacja Rady Kół Naukowych Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 2010, pp 92-103.
[9] D. Ščeulovs, E. Gaile-Sarkane, “E-marketing for company: external and internal influence,” Economics and management , vol 16, 2011.
[10] Latvia Internet Association, Survey “Latvian Business and Internet”, http://lia.lv/aktualitates/12/petijums_latvijas_bizness_un_internets.
[11] J. Immelt, “Decoding Jeff Immelt and GE's New Act: U.S. Manufacturer”,http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/02/11/de coding-jeff-immelt-ges-new-act-us-manufacturer.
[12] D. Ščeulovs, E. Gaile-Sarkane, “Social Networks for Business: Tool for Enterprise Competitiveness Increase,” in Current Issues in Management of Business and Society Development, Rīga, 2011, pp. 156-161.
[13] A. Gupta, et.al., “An empirical study of consumer switching from traditional to electronic channels: A purchase-decision process perspective,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 8, issue 3, pp. 131-161, 2004.
[14] T. Sung, “E-commerce critical success factors: East vs. West,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 73, issue 9, pp.1161-1177, 2006.
[15] T.L. Hsia, J.H Wu, E.Y. Li “The e-commerce value matrix and use case model: A goal-driven methodology for eliciting B2C application requirements,” Information & Management, vol. 45, issue 5, pp. 321- 330, 2008.
[16] F.D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), pp. 319-340, 1989.
[17] E. Kaasinen, “User acceptance of mobile services-value, ease of use, trust and ease of adoption”, http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2005/P566.pdf
[18] V. Venkatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis, F. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), pp. 425-478, 2003.
[19] S. Pugh, “Concept selection: a method that works,” in Proceedings international conference on engineering design, Rome, March 1981, pp. 497 – 506.
[20] Stimulating growth and employment: an action plan for doubling the volume of e-commerce in Europe by 2015, http://europa.eu/rapid/pressrelease_ IP-12-10_lv.htm?locale=en
[21] T.D. Wilson, “Models in information behavior research,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 249-270, June 1999.