Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30382
Probabilistic Characteristics of older PR Frames in the Mid-America Earthquake Region

Authors: Do-Hwan Kim, Roberto Leon

Abstract:

Probabilistic characteristics of seismic responses of the Partially Restrained connection rotation (PRCR) and panel zone deformation (PZD) installed in older steel moment frames were investigated in accordance with statistical inference in decision-making process. The 4, 6 and 8 story older steel moment frames with clip angle and T-stub connections were designed and analyzed using 2%/50yrs ground motions in four cities of the Mid-America earthquake region. The probability density function and cumulative distribution function of PRCR and PZD were determined by the goodness-of-fit tests based on probabilistic parameters measured from the results of the nonlinear time-history analyses. The obtained probabilistic parameters and distributions can be used to find out what performance level mainly PR connections and panel zones satisfy and how many PR connections and panel zones experience a serious damage under the Mid-America ground motions.

Keywords: Seismic Performance, Panel zone, Mid-America earthquake, PR connection, Probabilistic characteristics

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1330969

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1069

References:


[1] A. Ang and W. H. Tang, Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design. 2nd ed. vol I & II, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
[2] D. H. Kim and R. T. Leon, "Seismic performance of PR frames in frames in the Mid-America Earthquake Region," ASCE J. of Structural Engineering, vol. 133, no. 12, pp. 1808-1820, 2007.
[3] AISC, Steel Construction Manual. 5th ed., American Institute of Steel Construction, 1952.
[4] Anderson, Blume, Degenkolb, Hammill, Knapik, Marchand, Powers, Rinne, Sedgwick, and Sjoberg, "Lateral Forces of Earthquake and Wind," Transactions, ASCE, vol. 117, p. 716, 1952.
[5] C. W. Roeder, R. T. Leon, and F. R. Preece, Strength, Stiffness and Ductility of Older Steel Structures under Seismic Loading. Report SGEM 94-4, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, 1994.
[6] G. P. Forcier, Seismic Performance of Older Steel Frames. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, June 1994.
[7] CERI, Center for Earthquake Research and Information. University of Memphis, http://www.ceri.memphis.edu/public/, 2001.
[8] Y. K. Wen and C. L. Wu, "Generation of Ground Motions for Mid- America Cities," University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, December 2000.
[9] Papageorgiou et al., Engineering Seismology Laboratory (ESL) at the State University of New York at Buffalo, 2002.
[10] A. M. Law and W. D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 4th ed., McGraw Hill, 2007.
[11] FEMA, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Report FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1997.
[12] FEMA, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Report FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., November 2000.