The Impacts of Food Safety Standards on China Export of Vegetables and Fruits

Authors: Lei Dou, Mitsuhiro Nakagawa, Fei Yan, Ping Li

Abstract:

Participation in global trade means that Chinas vegetables and fruits industry faces international food safety standards and increased scrutiny worldwide. The objectives of this paper were to investigate how existing food safety standards and regulations in the importing countries impact the export of vegetables and fruits from China. This paper discussed the current and historical situations of Chinas vegetables and fruits export from 1996 to 2010, analyzed the Maximum Residual Limit (MRL) standards of pesticides imposed by importing countries, quantitatively estimated the impacts of food safety standards on Chinas vegetables and fruits export based on a gravity model. The results showed that although transportation distance between trade partners and tariff rates on vegetables and fruits were still the importantly resistant factors for China export, vegetables and fruits export was sensitive to the number of regulated pesticides, the strictness, and the level of food safety standards imposed by importing countries, which showed a significant trade flow effect, stricter food safety standards, increased number of regulated pesticides significantly inhibit China export of vegetables and fruits. Moreover, Chinas food safety standards also showed a significantly effect on vegetables and fruits export, which inhibited export to some extent. KeywordsFood safety standards, MRL, Vegetables, Fruits, Export.

Keywords: Food safety standards, MRL, Vegetables, Fruits, Export.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1330889

References:

[1] Xiong, B., Beghin, J. (2011). Disentangling the Demand-Enhancing Effect and Trade-Cost Effect of Technical Measures in Agricultural Trade among OECD Countries. Working Paper No. 11019. Department of Economics, IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY.
[2] Disdier, A., L. Fontagn, M. Mimouni (2008). The Impact of Regulations on Agricultural Trade: Evidence from the SPS and TBT Agreements. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(2): 336-350.
[3] Wei, G., Huang, J., Yang, J. (2012). The impacts of food safety standards on Chinas tea exports. China Economic Review, 23,253-264.
[4] Calvin, L., B. Krissoff, and W. E. Foster (2008). Measuring the Costs and Trade Effects of Phytosanitary Protocols: A U.S.Japanese Apple Example. Review of Agricultural Economics 30 (1): 120-135.
[5] Otsuki,T., Wilson,J., Sewadeh, M. (2001). What price precaution? European harmonization of aflatoxin regulations and African groundnut exports. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28, 263284.
[6] Huang, S., Gale, F. (2006). China's rising fruit and vegetable exports challenge U.S. industries. Electronic outlook report from the economic research service FTS-320-01, ERS, USDA.
[7] Otsuki, T., J. Wilson, M. Sewadeh (2001). Saving Two in a Billion: Quantifying the Trade Effect of European Food Safety Standards on African Exports. Food Policy 26(5): 495-514.
[8] Wilson, J S., Otsuki, T. (2004). To spray or not to spray: Pesticides, banana exports and food safety. Food Policy, 29, 131- 145.
[9] Wilson, J S., Otsuki,Y., Majumdsar,B.(2003). Balancing food safety and risk: Do drug residue limits affect international trade? Journal of International Trade and Development, 12(4), 377- 402.
[10] Sun, D., Zhou, J., Yang, X. (2005). Study on the effect of Japan's technical barriers on China's agricultural exports. Journal of Agricultural Technical Economics, 5, 612.
[11] Chen, C., Yang, J., Findlay, C. (2008). Measuring the effect of food safety standards on China's agricultural exports. Review of World Economics, 144, 83106.
[12] Bao, X. (2011). Do food safety standards promote or restrict Chinas grain exports? Journal of Finance and Economics. 37, 60-70.
[13] Anderson, J., E. van Wincoop (2003). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. The American Economic Review 93(1): 170-192.
[14] Bergstrand, J. 1985. The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics 67(3): 474-481.