2Taiwan Public Corporation's Participation in the Mechanism of Payment for Environmental Services
Authors: Wan-Yu Liu, Chun-Cheng Lin
Abstract:
The Taiwan government has started to promote the “Plain Landscape Afforestation and Greening Program" since 2002. A key task of the program was the payment for environmental services (PES), entitled the “Plain Landscape Afforestation Policy" (PLAP), which was certificated by the Executive Yuan on August 31, 2001 and enacted on January 1, 2002. According to the policy, it is estimated that the total area of afforestation will be 25,100 hectares by December 31, 2007. Until the end of 2007, the policy had been enacted for six years in total and the actual area of afforestation was 8,919.18 hectares. Among them, Taiwan Sugar Corporation (TSC) was accounted for 7,960 hectares (with 2,450.83 hectares as public service area) which occupied 86.22% of the total afforestation area; the private farmland promoted by local governments was accounted for 869.18 hectares which occupied 9.75% of the total afforestation area. Based on the above, we observe that most of the afforestation area in this policy is executed by TSC, and the achievement ratio by TSC is better than by others. It implies that the success of the PLAP is seriously related to the execution of TSC. The objective of this study is to analyze the relevant policy planning of TSC-s participation in the PLAP, suggest complementary measures, and draw up effective adjustment mechanisms, so as to improve the effectiveness of executing the policy. Our main conclusions and suggestions are summarized as follows: 1. The main reason for TSC-s participation in the PLAP is based on their passive cooperation with the central government or company policy. Prior to TSC-s participation in the PLAP, their lands were mainly used for growing sugarcane. 2. The main factors of TSC-s consideration on the selection of tree species are based on the suitability of land and species. The largest proportion of tree species is allocated to economic forests, and the lack of technical instruction was the main problem during afforestation. Moreover, the method of improving TSC-s future development in leisure agriculture and landscape business becomes a key topic. 3. TSC has developed short and long-term plans on participating in the PLAP for the future. However, there is no great willingness or incentive on budgeting for such detailed planning. 4. Most people from TSC interviewed consider the requirements on PLAP unreasonable. Among them, an unreasonable requirement on the number of trees accounted for the greatest proportion; furthermore, most interviewees suggested that the government should continue to provide incentives even after 20 years. 5. Since the government shares the same goals as TSC, there should be sufficient cooperation and communication that support the technical instruction and reduction of afforestation cost, which will also help to improve effectiveness of the policy.
Keywords: Payment for environmental services (PES), afforestation subsidy, Taiwan Sugar Corporation.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1328174
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1981References:
[1] W. T. Chen, "Evaluating affects of plain afforestation policy on environment," Taiwan Forestry Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 31-40, 2003.
[2] A. H. Chen, Y. L. Hsiao, C. L. Li, and H. M. Ho, "Current executing status and problem analysis of plain landscape afforestation in 2002," in Proceedings of the Workshop of Current Status and Perspective of afforestation in Taiwan, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Nov. 21, 2002.
[3] Forestry Bureau, Reference Manual on Promoting the Strategies of Afforestation in the Plain Areas, Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, 2002.
[4] O. Hendrickson, "Influences of global change on carbon sequestration by agricultural and forest soils," Environmental Reviews, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 161-192, 2003.
[5] Y. H. Huang, General Status on the Promotion of Projects for Rewarding Afforestation on Farmland, Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, 1991.
[6] Y. H. Huang, "Deliberating the problems of afforestation on farmland, Modern Silviculture," vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9-14, 1992.
[7] Y. H. Huang, "Greening and afforestation in the plain and coast areas," Taiwan Forestry Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 3-6, 2001.
[8] K. C. Lin, Evaluation of Taiwan Sugar Corporation-s Benefit from Plain Landscape, Authorized Project Series of Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan. Report number: 95-00-5-13, 2006.
[9] K. C. Lin and Y. N. Wang, Evaluation and Analysis of Growing Forest for Plain Landscape Afforestation Policy, 2003 Authorized Research Projects of Forestry Bureau and Its Affiliations, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan. Report number: 92-00-5-10. Graduate Institute of Agricultural Economics, National Taiwan University, 2003.
[10] K. C. Lin and W. Y. Liu, "An Evaluation and Assessment of Reforestation Policy in Taiwan," Agriculture and Economics, vol. 38, pp. 31-65, 2007.
[11] K. C. Lin and W. Y. Liu, "An Empirical Study of Afforestation Policy in Taiwan," Socioeconomic Law and Institution Review, vol. 40, pp. 175-211, 2007.
[12] W. Y. Liu, A Study on the Optimal Subsidy of Afforestation. Master Thesis, Graduate Institute of Agricultural Economics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2004.
[13] W. Y. Liu, The Economics Analysis of Landowners- Participation in Carbon Sequestration Programs and Mechanisms. Dissertation. Graduate Institute of Agricultural Economics, National Taiwan University, Taiwan, 2008.