Policies that Enhance Learning and Teaching

Authors: Shannon M. Chance, Pamela L. Eddy, Gavin Duffy, Brian Bowe, Jen Harvey

Abstract:

Educational institutions often implement policies with the intention of influencing how learning and teaching occur. Generally, such policies are not as effective as their makers would like; changing the behavior of third-level teachers proves difficult. Nevertheless, a policy instituted in 2006 at the Dublin Institute of Technology has met with success: each newly hired faculty member must have a post-graduate qualification in “Learning and Teaching" or successfully complete one within the first two years of employment. The intention is to build teachers- knowledge about student-centered pedagogies and their capacity to implement them. As a result of this policy (and associated programs that support it), positive outcomes are readily apparent. Individual teachers who have completed the programs have implemented significant change at the course and program levels. This paper introduces the policy, identifies outcomes in relation to existing theory, describes research underway, and pinpoints areas where organizational learning has occurred.

Keywords: Faculty Development, Institutional Policy, Learning and Teaching, Postgraduate Qualification, Professional Development.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1330255

References:

[1] Dublin Institute of Technology, "Strategy on Widening Participation," April 2011.
[2] Dublin Institute of Technology, "Strategy on Student Engagement," 2013.
[3] Learning, Teaching and Technology Centre, "Celebrating a decade of innovation and good practice in learning and teaching," Dublin, Ireland: Dublin Institutive of Technology, January 2010.
[4] N. Fitzpatrick, and J. Harvey (Eds.). Designing together: Effective strategies for creating a collaborative curriculum to support academic professional development. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin Institutive of Technology, 2011.
[5] S. M. Chance, G. Duffy, G., and B. Bowe, A phenomenological study of learning groups as a mechanism for transforming an Engineering Education program, (submitted for publication).
[6] A. Giddens, New Rules of Sociological Method, 2nd ed., Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993.
[7] Higher Education Authority. "Strategic Innovation Fund," http://www.hea.ie/en/sif
[8] G. Duffy, & B. Bowe, A framework to develop lifelong learning and transferable skills in an engineering programme, paper presented at the 3rd International Symposium for Engineering Education, 2010.
[9] G. Duffy, & B. Bowe, A strategy for the development of lifelong learning and personal skills throughout an undergraduate engineering programme, paper presented at the Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments, 2010.
[10] D. Adams, "Planning models and paradigms," in R. V. Carlson and G. Awkerman, Eds. Educational planning: Concepts, strategies, practices, White Plains, NY: Longman, 1991.
[11] R. Birnbaum, How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988.
[12] M. Cutright (Ed.), Chaos theory and higher education: Leadership, planning, and policy. Baltimore: Peter Lang, 2001.
[13] E. L. Holcomb, Asking the right questions, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2001.
[14] J. B. Presley, and D. W. Leslie, "Understanding strategy: An assessment of theory and practice," in J. C. Smart, and W. G. Tierney, Eds. Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, vol. 14. Bronx, NY: Agathon Press, 1999, pp. 201-239.
[15] D. J. Rowley, H. D. Lujan, and M. G. Dolence, Strategic choices for the academy: How demand for lifelong learning will re-create higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
[16] D. Wilson, Project monitoring: A newer component of the educational planning process. Educational Planning, vol. 11, no. 1, 1997, pp. 31-40.
[17] D. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
[18] J. Dewey, Experience and education. New York: Collier Books, 1938.
[19] M. Fullan, Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
[20] N. Sanford, "Developmental status of the entering freshman," in N. Sanford, Ed. The American College. New York: Wiley and Sons, 1962.
[21] L. Lauer, Advancing higher education in uncertain times. Washington, DC: Council for Advancement and Support of Education, 2006.
[22] D. J. Rowley, and H. Sherman, From strategy to change: Implementing the plan in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
[23] J. S. Black, and H. B. Gregersen, It starts with one: Changing individuals changes organizations, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing, 2008.
[24] M. Gladwell, The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 2000.
[25] S. Chance, Strategic by design: Iterative approaches to educational planning. Planning for Higher Education, vol. 38 no. 2, 2010, pp. 40-54.
[26] L. M. McDonnell, and R. F. Elmore, Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. no. 2, 1987, pp. 133-152.
[27] P. L. Eddy, Using partnerships to achieve national goals. Peer reviewed research paper at the International Conference on Higher Education, Paris, France, submitted for publication.
[28] M. Burns, Leadership, New York: Harper and Row, 1978. H. Kelman, Process of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 25 no. 1, 1961, pp. 57-78.
[29] G. Huber, Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature. Organization Science, vol. 2 no. 2, 1991, pp. 88-115.
[30] C. Argyris, and D. Schön, Organizational learning II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996.
[31] C. Argyris, and D. Schön, Organizational learning II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996.
[32] S. M. Chance, and B. Williams, Assessing university strategic plans: A tool for consideration. Educational Planning: The Journal of the International Society for Educational Planning, vol. 18 no. 1, 2009, pp. 38-54.
[33] B. Barnetson, "Performance indicators and chaos theory," in M. Cutright, Ed. Chaos theory and higher education: Leadership, planning, and policy. Baltimore: Peter Lang, 2001, pp. 145-158.
[34] G. Gordon, "Learning from quality assessment," in S. Ketteridge, S. Marshall, & H. Fry, Eds. The effective academic: A handbook for enhanced academic practice. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2002, pp. 201-217.
[35] J. P. Swenk, "Strategic planning and chaos theory: Are they compatible?" in M. Cutright, Ed. Chaos theory and higher education: Leadership, planning, and policy. Baltimore: Peter Lang, 2001, pp. 33- 56.
[36] M. D. Cohen, J. G. March, and J. P. Olsen, A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17 no. 1, 1972, pp. 1-25.