The Impact of Knowledge Sharing on Innovation Capability in United Arab Emirates Organizations

Authors: S. Abdallah, A. Khalil, A. Divine

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between knowledge sharing and innovation capability, by examining the influence of individual, organizational and technological factors on knowledge sharing. The research is based on a survey of 103 employees from different organizations in the United Arab Emirates. The study is based on a model and a questionnaire that was previously tested by Lin [1]. Thus, the study aims at examining the validity of that model in UAE context. The results of the research show varying degrees of correlation between the different variables, with ICT use having the strongest relationship with the innovation capabilities of organizations. The study also revealed little evidence of knowledge collecting and knowledge sharing among UAE employees.

Keywords: Knowledge sharing, Organization Innovation, Technology Use, Innovation Capabilities.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1058771

References:

[1] Lin, H.-F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of manpower, 28(3/4), pp. 315- 322.
[2] Voepel, S., & Zheng, H. (2005). Managing knowledge sharing in china: The case of Siemens sharenet. Journal of Knowledge management, 9(3), pp. 51-63.
[3] Reid, F. (2003, 10 16). Creating a knowledge sharing culture among diverse business units. Employment Relations Today, 0(3), pp. 43-49.
[4] Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2003). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal or Product Innovation Management, 19, pp. 90-132.
[5] Wasko, M. M., Faraj, S., & Teigland, R. (2004). Collective action and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Journal of the Association of Information systems, 5(11),493-513.
[6] Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), pp. 64-76
[7] Taylor, W.A. and Wright, G.H. (2004). Organizational readiness for successful knowledge sharing: challenges for public sector managers. Information Resources Management Journal, 17(2), pp. 22-37.
[8] Van den Hooff, B. and Van Weenen, F.D.L. (2004a). Committed to share: commitment and CMC use as antecedents of knowledge sharing", Knowledge and Process Management, 11(1), pp. 13-24.
[9] Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), pp. 555-590.
[10] Tavancl, E. (2005). Tutumlarn öl├º├╝lmesi ve spss ile veri analizi
[Measuring attitudes and data analysis with spss]. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
[11] Marshall, A.P., Fisher, M.J., Brammer, J., Eustace, P., Grech, C., Jones, B. & Kelly, M. (2007). Assessing psychometric properties of scales: a case study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59, pp. 398-406
[12] DeVellis, R.F. (1991). Scale development: theory and applications (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 26). Newbury Park: Sage.
[13] Spooren, P., Mortelmans, D. & Denekans, J. (2007). Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: development of an instrument based on 10 Likert-scales. Assessment & E1valuation Higher Education, 32, pp. 667-679.