Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
A New Measurable Definition of Knowledge in New Growth Theory

Authors: Mohammad Ali Molaei

Abstract:

New Growth Theory helps us make sense of the ongoing shift from a resource-based economy to a knowledge-based economy. It underscores the point that the economic processes which create and diffuse new knowledge are critical to shaping the growth of nations, communities and individual firms. In all too many contributions to New (Endogenous) Growth Theory – though not in all – central reference is made to 'a stock of knowledge', a 'stock of ideas', etc., this variable featuring centre-stage in the analysis. Yet it is immediately apparent that this is far from being a crystal clear concept. The difficulty and uncertainty of being able to capture the value associated with knowledge is a real problem. The intent of this paper is introducing new thinking and theorizing about the knowledge and its measurability in new growth theory. Moreover the study aims to synthesize various strain of the literature with a practical bearing on knowledge concept. By contribution of institution framework which is found within NGT, we can indirectly measure the knowledge concept. Institutions matter because they shape the environment for production and employment of new knowledge

Keywords: Institution Framework, Knowledge, New GrowthTheory (NGT)

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1058589

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1290

References:


[1] Romer, P.M., Implementing a National Technology Strategy with Self- Organizing Industry Investment Boards, in Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics. 1993.
[2] Steedman, I., On ÔÇÿMeasuring- Knowledge in New (Endogenous) Growth Theory, in Growth Theory Conference. 2001: Pisa, Italy.
[3] Cortright, J., New Growth Theory,Technology and Learning, in Reviews of Economic Development. 2001, U.S. Economic Development Administration: Portland.
[4] Nelson, R.R. and P.M. Romer, Science, Economic Growth and Public Policy. Challenge, 1996. March-April, 1996: p. 9-21.
[5] Jarboe, K.P. and R.D. Atkinson, The Case for Technology in the Knowledge Economy: R&D, Economic Growth, and the Role of Government. 1998, Progressive Policy Institute: Washington, DC.
[6] Romer, P.M., Endogenous technical change. Journal of Political Economy, 1990. 98: p. 71-102.
[7] Polanyi, M., The Tacit Dimension. 1967, New York: Doubleday.
[8] Dosi, G., The Contribution of Economic Theory to the Understanding of a Knowledgebased Economy. Employment and Growth in a Knowledge- Based Economy. 1996, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation Development.
[9] Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Create the Dynamics of Innovation. 1995, New York: Oxford University Press.
[10] Pavitt, K., Internationalisation of technological innovation. Science and Public Policy, 1992. 19(2): p. 119-123.
[11] Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. 1982, Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[12] Arthur, B., Increasing Returns and the Two Worlds of Business. Harvard Business Review, 1996. July-August, 1996.
[13] Romer, P.M., Beyond Classical and Keynesian Macroeconomic Policy. Policy Options, 1994. 15(July-August, 1994): p. 15-21.
[14] Olson, M., Big Bills Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations are Rich, and Others Poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1996. 10(2): p. 3- 24.
[15] North, D.C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. 1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[16] Thurow, L., Building Wealth: The New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and Nations in the Knowledge-Based Economy. 1999, New York: Harper Collins.