Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30172
Discrimination in Primary Education in the Slums of Turkey: Problems about Equity of Education

Authors: Erten Gokce

Abstract:

This study was carried out in Ankara, the capital city of Turkey, in order to determine how people living in the slums of Ankara benefit from educational equality. Within the scope of the research, interviews were made with 64 families whose children have been getting education from the primary schools of these parts and the data of the study was collected by the researcher. The results of the research demonstrate that the children getting education in the slums of Ankara can not experience educational equality and justice. The results of this study show that the opportunities of the schools in the slums of Ankara are very limited, so the individuals in these districts can not equally benefit from the education. The families are aware of the problem they are faced with. KeywordsDiscrimination, inequality, primary education, slums of Turkey.

Keywords: Discrimination, inequality, primary education, slums of Turkey.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1057455

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1188

References:


[1] L. I. Unal and S. Ozsoy. Modern Trkiyenin Sisyphos Miti: Eitimde Frsat Eitlii. In 75 Ylda Eitim. (Education in 75 Years), Ed. F. Gok. stanbul: Tarih Vakfi and Turkiye I Bankasi Yayinlari, pp. 39-72.
[2] H. J. Holzer, and J. Ludwig, Measuring Discrimination in Education: Are Methodologies From Labor and Markets Useful?, Georgetown Public Policy Institute.
[3] H. H. Aksoy. Seilmi Gstergeler Yoluyla Eitimde Nitelike likin Bir Tartma. (A Discussion on Quality in Education Through Selected Indicators) Abece Eitim ve Ekin Journal. Vol. 249, May 2007. pp. 2-6,
[4] MEB. Yllk Geliim Raporu. (Annual Development Report) MEB Yaynlar, Ankara, 2006.
[5] UNICEF. Telafi Eitimi Projesi Aratrma Raporu, (Research Report on Catch-up Study Project). Ankara, 2006.
[6] J. Hyde, Inequality and Education, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Geneva, 2001 Available: http://[7] A. Golba. How Does Education in Urban Schools Compar To Suburban Schools?, 1998 Available: http://.
[8] S. Ozsoy. Eitim Hakk: Kendi Dilini Bulamam Bir Sylem. (Right for Education: A Discourse That Could Not Find Its Own Language) Egitim Bilim Toplum. Vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 58- 83.
[9] M. Kasimolu, and A. Halici, Discrimination areas in higher education institutions in Turkey and a scale development study, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 16, No. 7, 2002.
[10] G. De Frajai, Reverse Discrimination And Efficiency In Education, International Economic Review, Vol. 46, No. 3, UK, August 2005.
[11] A. Brown, Equality of Opportunity for Education:One-off or Lifelong?, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2006.
[12] A. Gamoran, What Wil Decrease Educational Inequality?, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, 2001 Available: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/news/coverStories/decrease_ed_ inequity.php
[13] H. H. Aksoy. Eitimde Kalitenin Kalite Sistemleri, Eitlik ve Kresellemeye likin Boyutlar. Panel Discussion of Total Quality Management in Education. , Quality Association Ankara Brunch, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, February 21, 2001.
[14] EGM. Yllk Su statistikleri,(Annual of Crime Statistics) EGM Yayn, Ankara,2006.
[15] J. Bynner, and H. Joshi, Equality and Opportunity in Education: evidence from the 1958 and 1970 birth cohort studies, Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2002.
[16] M. Altunya. Eitim Hakk. (Right for Education) Right for Education and Village Institutions Panel Discussion. Ankara University, February 2006.