Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30172
Automated Ranking of Hints

Authors: Sylvia Encheva

Abstract:

The importance of hints in an intelligent tutoring system is well understood. The problems however related to their delivering are quite a few. In this paper we propose delivering of hints to be based on considering their usefulness. By this we mean that a hint is regarded as useful to a student if the student has succeeded to solve a problem after the hint was suggested to her/him. Methods from the theory of partial orderings are further applied facilitating an automated process of offering individualized advises on how to proceed in order to solve a particular problem.

Keywords: Decision support services, uncertainty management, partial orderings.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1056939

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1173

References:


[1] V. Aleven, V., and K. R. Koedinger, Limitations of Student Control: Do Student Know when they need help?, In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, and K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2000 Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2000, 292-303
[2] R. S. Baker, A. T. Corbett, and K. R. Koedinger, Detecting student misuse of intelligent tutoring systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3220, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New Jork, 2004, 531-540
[3] R. S. Baker, A. T. Corbett, I. Roll, I., and K. R. Koedinger, Developing a Generalizable Detector of When Students Game the System. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research, 18, 3, 2008, 287-314.
[4] S. Berg, Condorcet's Jury Theorem and the Reliability of Majority Voting, Group Decision and Negotiation, 5(3), 1996, 229-238
[5] K. P. Bogart, Some social sciences applications of ordered sets, In: I. Rival, Editor, Ordered Sets, Reidel, Dordrecht 1982, 759 - 787
[6] J. Breuker, J., Components of Problem Solving and Types of Problems, In 8th European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, EKAW '94, 1994, 118-136
[7] A. Brunstein, and J. Krems, Helps and Hints for Learning with Web Based Learning Systems: The Role of Instructions, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3220, 2004, 794-796.
[8] J. Bull, and C. McKenna, Blueprint for Computer-assisted Assessment, RoutledgeFalmer, 2003.
[9] J. Bull, and S. Zakrzewski, The mass implementation and evaluation of computer-based assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 1998, 141-152.
[10] J. Bull, and D. Stephens, The use of question mark software for formative and summat assessment in two universities. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36(2), 1999, 128-136.
[11] R. Harper, Correcting computer-based assessments for guessing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 2003, 2-8.
[12] K. R. Koedinger, B. M. McLaren and I. Roll, A help-seeking tutor agent. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2004, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2004, 227-239.
[13] M. Mayo, and A. Mitrovic, Optimising ITS behaviour with Bayesian networks and decision theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelli¬gence in Education, 12, 2001, 124-153.
[14] M. Oliver, J. MacBean, G. Conole, and J. Harvey, Using a Toolkit to Support the Evaluation of Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 2002, 199-208.
[15] E. Pecheanu, C. Segal and D. Stefanescu, Content modeling in Intel¬ligent Instructional Environment. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3190, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New Jork, 2003, 1229-1234.
[16] A. Renld, Learning from worked-out examples: Instructional explana-tions supplement self- explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 2002, 529-556.
[17] S. Schworm, and A. Renkl, Learning by solved example problems: Instructional explanations reduce self-explanation activity. In W. D. Gray and C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceeding of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002, 816-821.
[18] B. Shih, K. R. Koedinger, R. Scheines, A response time model for bottom-out hints as worked examples. In Baker, R.S.J.d., Barnes, T., and Beck, J.E. (Eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 2008, 117-126.
[19] D. Tsovaltzi, A. Fiedler, and H. Horacek, A Multi-dimensional Taxonomy for Automating Hinting, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3220, 2004, 772-781.
[20] J. A. Walonoski, N. T. Heffernan, Prevention of Off-Task Gaming Behavior in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2006, 722-724.
[21] D. Wood, Scaffolding, contingent tutoring, and computer-supported learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 2001, 280-292.
[22] Y. Zhou, R. Freedman, M. Glass, J. A. Michael, A. Allen, A. A. Rovick, and M. W. Evens, Delivering hints in a dialogue-based intelli¬gent tutoring system, Proceedings of the sixteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence and the eleventh Innovative applications of artificial intelligence conference innovative applications of artificial intelligence, 1999, 128-134.
[23] http://design.test.oltubc.ca/Intelligent_Tutoring_System
[24] http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/ zaiane/courses/cmput605/2008-3.html
[25] http://www.engsc.ac.uldjournal/index.php/ee/article/ view/62/97
[26] Apache HTTP Server Project, http://httpd.apache.org/
[27] Python Programming Language, http://www.python.org/
[28] SQLite, http://www.sqlite.org/