Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Digital Scholarship and Disciplinary Culture: An Investigation of Sultan Qaboos University, Oman

Authors: Ali S. Al-Aufi, Paul Genoni

Abstract:

The emergence of networked information and communication has transformed the accessibility and delivery of scholarly information and fundamentally impacted on the processes of research and scholarly communication. The purpose of this study is to investigate disciplinary differences in the use of networked information for research and scholarly communication at Sultan Qaboos University, Oman. This study has produced quantitative data about how and why academics within different disciplines utilize networked information that is made available either internally through the university library, or externally through networked services accessed by the Internet. The results indicate some significant differences between the attitudes and practice of academics in the science disciplines when compared to those from the social sciences and humanities. While respondents from science disciplines show overall longer and more frequent use of networked information, respondents from humanities and social sciences indicated more positive attitudes and a greater degree of satisfaction toward library networked services.

Keywords: Academics, Arab World, Disciplinary Culture, Networked Information, Scholarly Communication, Sultan QaboosUniversity, Oman.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1056813

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1216

References:


[1] Ministry of Information, Oman 2005-2006. 2006, Muscat: Ministry of Information.
[2] Bailey, C.W., Scholarly Electronic Publishing on the Internet, the NREN, and the NII: Charting Possible Futures. Serials Review 1994. 20(3): p. 7-16.
[3] Menzel, H., Information Needs and Uses in Science and Technology, in Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, C.Z. Cuadra, Editor. 1966, John Wiley and Sons: New York. p. 41-69.
[4] Garvey, W.D., K. Tomita, and P. Woolf, The Dynamic Scientific Information User. Information Storage and Retrieval, 1974. 10(4): p. 115-131.
[5] Simonton, W.C., Characteristics of the Research Literature in the Fine Arts During the Period 1948-1957. 1960, University of Illinois: Chicago.
[6] Gleaves, E.S., Characteristics of the Research Materials Used by Scholars who Write in Journals in the Field of American Literature. 1961, Emory University: Atlanta.
[7] Line, M.B., The Information Uses and Needs of Social Scientist: an Overview of INFROSS. ASLIB proceedings, 1971. 23(8): p. 412-434.
[8] Skelton, B., Scientists and Social Scientists as Information Users: A Comparison of Results of Science User Studies with the Investigation into Information Requirements of the Social Sciences. Journal of Librarianship, 1973. 5: p. 138-156.
[9] Lu, S., The Transition to the Virtual World in Formal Scholarly Communication: A Comparative Study of the Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences. 1999, University of California: Los Angeles.
[10] Bouazza, A., Use of Information Sources by Physical Scientists, Social Scientists, and Humanities Scholars at Carnegi Mellon University, in School of Library and Information Science. 1986, University of Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh.
[11] Meadows, A.J., Communicating Research. 1998, California: Academic Press.
[12] Bynum, W.E., et al, Dictionary of the History of Science. 1981, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[13] Cohen, B., An Analysis of Interactions Between the Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences, in The natural sciences and the social sciences: some critical and historical perspectives, B. Cohen, Editor. 1993, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. p. 1-90.
[14] White, L.M., The Humanities, in Handbook of the Undergraduate Curriculum: A Comprehensive Guide to Purposes, Structures, Practices, and Change, J.L.R. Jerry G. Gaff, et. al.,, Editor. 1997, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco. p. 262-279.
[15] Bishop, A.P., The Role of Computer Networks in Aerospace Engineering. Library Trends, 1994. 42(4): p. 694-729.
[16] Brown, C.D., The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication in the Research Process of Music Scholars: an exploratory investigation. Information Research, 2001. 6(2).
[17] Shaw, W., The Use of the Internet by English Academics. Information Research, 1998. 4(2).
[18] Zhang, Y., Scholarly Use of Internet-Based Electronic Resources: A Survey Report. Library Trends, 1999. 46(4): p. 746-770.
[19] Abdulaziz, T.O., Benefits of the Internet on Egyptians Academics at Social Sciences Disciplines. Majallat Maktabat Almalik Fahad Alwataniyya (Journal of King Fahad National Library), 2005. 11(1): p. 179-222. (source in Arabic).
[20] Abels, E.G., P. Liebscher, and D.W. Denman, Factors that Influence the Use of Electronic Networks by Science and Engineering Faculty at Small Institutions. Part I Queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1996. 47(2): p. 146-158.
[21] Abels, E.G., P. Liebscher, and D.W. Denman, Factors that Influence the Use of Electronic Networks by Science and Engineering Faculty at Small Institutions. Part II Preliminary Use Indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997. 48(6): p. 496-507.
[22] Costa, S. and J. Meadows, The Impact of Computer Usage on Scholarly Communication Among Social Scientists. Journal of Information Science, 2000. 26(4): p. 255-262.
[23] Eisend, M., The Internet as a New Medium for the Sciences: The Effects of Internet Use on Traditional Scientific Communication Media Among Social Scientists in Germany. Online Information Review, 2002. 26(5): p. 307-317.
[24] Seyal, A.H., M.N. Abd-Rahman, and M. Mahbubur-Rahim, Determinants of Academic Use of the Internet: a Structural Equation Model. Behaviour & Information technology, 2002. 21(1): p. 71-86.
[25] Applebee, A., et al., Academics Online: A Nationwide Quantitative Study of Australian Academic Use of the Internet. 1998, Adelaide: Auslib Press.
[26] Applebee, A., P. Clayton, and C. Pascoe, Australian Academic Use of the Internet. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 1997. 7(2): p. 85-94.
[27] Bane, A.F. and W.D. Milheim, Internet Insights: How Academics are Using the Internet. Computers in Libraries, 1995. 15(2): p. 32-36.
[28] Bruce, H., Internet Services and Academic Work: An Australian Perspective. Internet Research, 1994. 4(2): p. 24-34.
[29] Budd, J.M. and L.S. Connaway, University Faculty and Networked Information: Results of a Survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997. 48(9): p. 843-852.
[30] Heterick, B., E-content: Faculty Attitudes Toward Electronic Resources. Educause Review, 2002. 37(4): p. 10-11.
[31] Houghton, J.W., C. Steele, and M. Henty, Changing Research Practices in the Digital Information and Communication Environment. 2003, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
[32] Kaminer, N., Scholars and the Use of the Internet. Library and Information Science Research, 1997. 19(4): p. 329-345.
[33] Lazinger, S.S., J. Bar-Ilan, and B.C. Peritz, Internet Use by Faculty Members in Various Disciplines: A Comparative Case Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1997. 48(6): p. 508-518.
[34] Schauder, D., Electronic Publishing of Professional Articles: Attitudes of Academics and Implications for the Scholarly Communication Industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994. 45(2): p. 73-100.
[35] Wang, Y.-M. and A. Cohen, Communicating and Sharing in Cyberspace: University Faculty Use of Internet Resources. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2000. 6(4): p. 303-315.
[36] Abdullah, N.M., Faculty Members' Attitudes Toward the Internet at Cairo University. Aalam Alma'lomat Walmaktabat Walnashir (World of Information, Libraries, and Publishing), 1999. 1(1): p. 81-106. (Source in Arabic).
[37] Adika, G., Internet Use Among Faculty Members of Universities in Ghana. Library Review, 2003. 52(1): p. 29-37.
[38] Bin-Alsabti, A., Electronic Exchange of Information Among Academic Researchers at Mentouri University of Constantine. Alarabiyya 3000 (The Arabic 3000), 2003. 1 (source in Arabic).
[39] Boumarafi, B.M., Use of the Internet by Faculty Members at Al-Sharjah University. Rissalat Almaktaba (Library Message), 2001. 36(2): p. 111- 116 (source in Arabic).
[40] Ehikhamenor, F.A., Internet Facilities: Use and Non-use by Nigerian University Scientists. Journal of information science, 2003. 29(1): p. 35- 48.
[41] Jirjees, J.M. and A. Nashir, Use of the Internet by Faculty Members of the Yemeni Universities in Sana'a City, in The united Arabic strategy for Information in the era of Internet and other studies, AFLI, Editor. 1999, The Arab Federation for Libraries and Information (AFLI). (Source in Arabic): Beirut.
[42] Mamtora, J., Pacific Academics and the Internet. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 2004. 35(1): p. 35-52.
[43] Uddin, M.N., Internet use by University Academics: A Bipartite Study of Information and Communication Needs. Online Information Review, 2003. 27(4): p. 225-237.
[44] Garvey, W., Communication: The Essence of Science. 1979, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
[45] Tenopir, C. Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: an Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. 2003 (cited 2005 3/9); Available from: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub120/contents.html.
[46] Torma, S. and P. Vakkari, Dicipline, Availability of Electronic Resources and the Use of Finnish National Electronic Library - FinELib. Information Research, 2004. 10(1).
[47] Lu, S. A Cross Sectional Study of the Impact of the Internet on Formal Scholarly Communication. in Information Access in the Global Information Economy, October 25-29. 1998. Pittsburgh: ASIS.
[48] Talja, S. and H. Maula, Reasons for the Use and Non-use of Electronic Journals and Databases: A Domain Analytic Study in Four Scholarly Disciplines. Journal of Documentation, 2003. 59(6): p. 673-691.
[49] Lenares, D. Faculty Use of Electronic Journals at Research Institutions. in 9th National Conference of the Association of College & Research Libraries, 9 April 1999. 1999. Detroit, Michigan: ACRL.
[50] Borgman, C.L., Digital Libraries and the Continuum of Scholarly Communication. Journal of Documentation, 2000. 56(4): p. 412-430.
[51] eJUST. E-Journal User Study: Report of First Survey. 2002 (cited 2005 1/5/); Available from: http://ejust.stanford.edu/method_surveys.html.
[52] Tomney, H. and P.F. Burton, Electronic Journals: A Study of Usage and Attitudes Among Academics. Journal of information science, 1998. 24: p. 419-429.
[53] Weingart, S.J. and J.A. Anderson, When Questions are Answers: Using a Survey to Achieve Faculty Awareness of the Library's Electronic Resources. College and research Libraries, 2000. 61: p. 127-134.
[54] Field, A., Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2nd ed. 2005, London: SAGE Publications.
[55] Blanksby, P.E. and J.G. Barber, SPSS for Social Workers: An Introductory Workbook. 2006, Boston: Pearson Education
[56] United Nations Development Programme. Arab Human Development Report 2003: Building a Knowledge Society. 2003 (cited 2005 11 November); Available from: http://www.undp.org.sa/Reports/AHDR%202003%20-%20English.pdf.
[57] Ibrhaim, A.E., Use and User Perception of Electronic Resources in the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU). Libri, 2004. 54: p. 18-29.