Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30184
Breast Cancer Treatment Evaluation based on Mammographic and Echographic Distance Computing

Authors: M. Caramihai, Irina Severin, H. Balan, A. Blidaru, V. Balanica

Abstract:

Accurate assessment of the primary tumor response to treatment is important in the management of breast cancer. This paper introduces a new set of treatment evaluation indicators for breast cancer cases based on the computational process of three known metrics, the Euclidian, Hamming and Levenshtein distances. The distance principals are applied to pairs of mammograms and/or echograms, recorded before and after treatment, determining a reference point in judging the evolution amount of the studied carcinoma. The obtained numerical results are indeed very transparent and indicate not only the evolution or the involution of the tumor under treatment, but also a quantitative measurement of the benefit in using the selected method of treatment.

Keywords: Breast cancer, Distance metrics, Cancer treatment evaluation.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1056601

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1213

References:


[1] B.K. Verma, Heredity & Cancer: Breast cancer as a model, IASTED RM-96, Hawaii, USA, 1999, pp. 84-88.
[2] Carlos Andres Pena et all, Proceedings Information Processing in Medical Imaging, IPMI"03, 2003.
[3] K. S. Woods, C. C. Doss, Comparative Evaluation of Pattern Recognition Techniques M 16L-171PI for Detection of Microcalcifications in Mammography, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 1993.
[4] K.S. Woods, C.C Doss, Comparative Evaluation of Pattern Recognition Techniques for Detection of Microcalcifications in Mammography, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2003, pp. 80-85.
[5] Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, et all, Prognostic factors in breast cancer, pp. 124:966-978, College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1999, 2000.
[6] Mirza AN, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, et all, Prognostic factors in nodenegative breast cancer: a review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years, Ann Surg, 2002, 235:10-26.
[7] Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et all, AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 6th ed. New York: Springer Verlag, 2002.
[8] Sobin LH, Wittekind CH, eds. TNM, Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
[9] Adair F, Berg J, Joubert L, et all, Long-term follow-up of breast cancer patients: the 30-year report, Cancer, 1974, pp. 33:1145-1150.
[10] Abraham. Kandel, Fuzzy Expert Systems, CRC Press, 2002.
[11] Lance Chambers, Practical Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, CRC Press, 2004.
[12] Stephen I. Gallant, Neural Network Learning and Expert Systems, MIT Press, 2006.
[13] *** Case studies and clinical documentation, Institute of Oncology Bucharest.