Determination of Seismic Wave of Consolidated Granite Rock in Penang Island: UltrasonicTesting Method Vs Seismic Refraction Method

Authors: Mohd Hafiz Musa, Zulfadhli Hasan Adli, M . N . Khairul Arifin

Abstract:

In seismic survey, the information regarding the velocity of compression wave (Vp) as well as shear wave (Vs) are very useful especially during the seismic interpretation. Previous studies showed that both Vp and Vs determined by above methods are totally different with respect to each other but offered good approximation. In this study, both Vp and Vs of consolidated granite rock were studied by using ultrasonic testing method and seismic refraction method. In ultrasonic testing, two different condition of rock are used which is dry and wet. The differences between Vp and Vs getting by using ultrasonic testing and seismic refraction were investigated and studied. The effect of water content in granite rock towards the value of Vp and Vs during ultrasonic testing are also measured. Within this work, the tolerance of the differences between the velocity of seismic wave getting from ultrasonic testing and the velocity of seismic wave getting from seismic refraction are also measured and investigated.

Keywords: Compressional wave, Granite, Shear Wave, Velocity

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1327877

References:

[1] Turk N, Dearman WR. A suggested approach to rock characterization in terms of seismic velocities. In: Hartman HL, editor. Proceedings of the 27th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Society of Mining Engineers, 1986. P. 168-75.
[2] Young RP, Hill TT, Bryan IR, Middleton R. Seismic spectroscopy in fracture characterization. Quart J Eng Geol 1985;18:459-79.
[3] Onodera TF. Dynamic investigation of foundation rocks, in situ. In: proceedings of the Fifth US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Pergamon Press New York, 1963. P. 517 33.
[4] Gladwin MT. Ultrasonic stress monitoring in underground mining. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1982;19:221-8
[5] S. Kahraman. The correlations between the saturated and dry P-wave velocity of rocks. Min Eng Dept, Nigde Turkey. Ultrasonic (46);2007:341-348
[6] S. Kahraman. Estimating the direct P-wave velocity value of intact rock from indirect laboratory measurements. Int Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002. 101-104.
[7] D-Andrea DV, Fischer RL, Fogelson DE, Prediction of compressive strength from other rock properties. US Bureau of Mines Report of Investigation, Vol. 6702, 1965.
[8] Deere DU, Miller RP. Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Air Force Weapon Lab. Tech. Report, AFWL-TR 65- 116, Kirtland Base, NM, 1966.
[9] Youash Y. dynamic physical properties of rocks: part 2, experimental result. In: Proceedings of the Second Congress of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, Beograd, Vol. 1, 1970. P. 185-95.
[10] Saito T, Mamoru ABE, Kundri S.Study on weathering of igneous rocks. In: Rock Mechanics in Japan, Vol. 2, 1974. P. 28-30.
[11] Gardner GHF, Gardner LW, Gregory AR. Formation velocity and density: the diagnostic basis for stratigraphic. Geophysics 1974;39:770- 80.
[12] D 2845-69(1976). Laboratory Determination of Pulse Velocities and Ultrasonic Elastic Constant of Rock. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 1981. Part 19. Natural Building Stones; Soil and Rock.