Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31181
Empirical Process Monitoring Via Chemometric Analysis of Partially Unbalanced Data

Authors: Hyun-Woo Cho

Abstract:

Real-time or in-line process monitoring frameworks are designed to give early warnings for a fault along with meaningful identification of its assignable causes. In artificial intelligence and machine learning fields of pattern recognition various promising approaches have been proposed such as kernel-based nonlinear machine learning techniques. This work presents a kernel-based empirical monitoring scheme for batch type production processes with small sample size problem of partially unbalanced data. Measurement data of normal operations are easy to collect whilst special events or faults data are difficult to collect. In such situations, noise filtering techniques can be helpful in enhancing process monitoring performance. Furthermore, preprocessing of raw process data is used to get rid of unwanted variation of data. The performance of the monitoring scheme was demonstrated using three-dimensional batch data. The results showed that the monitoring performance was improved significantly in terms of detection success rate of process fault.

Keywords: Kernel methods, Process monitoring, Quality improvement, multivariate filtering, data-driven techniques

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1088942

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1171

References:


[1] S. J. Qin, “Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 17, pp. 480–502, 2003.
[2] S. Bersimis, S. Psarakis, J. Panaretos, “Multivariate statistical process control charts: an overview,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 23, pp. 517–543, 2007.
[3] X. Meng, A. J. Morris, E. B. Martin, “On-line monitoring of batch processes using PARAFAC representation,” Journal of Chemometrics, vol. 17, pp. 65-81, 2003.
[4] V. A. Sotiris, P. W. Tse, M. G. Pecht, “Anomaly detection through a bayesian support vector machine,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 59, pp. 277-286, 2010.
[5] R. Lombardo, J.-F. Durand, A. P. Leone, “Multivariate additive PLS spline boosting in agro-chemistry studies,” Current Analytical Chemistry, vol. 8, pp. 236-253, 2012.
[6] L. H. Chiang, E. L. Russell, R. D. Braatz, “Fault monitoring in chemical processes using Fisher discriminant analysis, discriminant partial least squares, and principal component analysis,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 50, pp. 243-252, 2000.
[7] J. A. Westerhuis, S. de Jong, A. K. Smilde, “Direct orthogonal signal correction,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 56, pp. 13-25, 2001.
[8] G. Baudat, and F. Anouar, “ Generalized discriminant analysis using a kernel approach,” Neural Computation, vol. 12, pp. 2385-2404, 2000.
[9] H.-W. Cho, K. J. Kim, “A method for predicting future observations in the monitoring of a batch process,” Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 35, pp. 59-69, 2003.