Roughness and Hardness of 60/40 Cu-Zn Alloy
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Roughness and Hardness of 60/40 Cu-Zn Alloy

Authors: Pavana Manvikar, G K Purohit

Abstract:

The functional performance of machined components, often, depends on surface topography, hardness, nature of stress and strain induced on the surface, etc. Invariably, surfaces of metallic components obtained by turning, milling, etc., consist of irregularities such as machining marks are responsible for the above. Surface finishing/coating processes used to produce improved surface quality/textures are classified as chip-removal and chip-less processes. Burnishing is chip-less cold working process carried out to improve surface finish, hardness and resistance to fatigue and corrosion; not obtainable by other surface coating and surface treatment processes. It is a very simple, but effective method which improves surface characteristics and is reported to introduce compressive stresses.

Of late, considerable attention is paid to post-machining, finishing operations, such as burnishing. During burnishing the micro-irregularities start to deform plastically, initially the crests are gradually flattened and zones of reduced deformation are formed. When all the crests are deformed, the valleys between the micro-irregularities start moving in the direction of the newly formed surface. The grain structure is then condensed, producing a smoother and harder surface with superior load-carrying and wear-resistant capabilities.

Burnishing can be performed on a lathe with a highly polished ball or roller type tool which is traversed under force over a rotating/stationary work piece. Often, several passes are used to obtain the work piece surface with the desired finish and hardness.

This paper presents the findings of an experimental investigation on the effect of ball burnishing parameters such as, burnishing speed, feed, force and number of passes; on surface roughness (Ra) and micro-hardness (Hv) of a 60/40 copper/zinc alloy, using a 2-level fractional factorial design of experiments (DoE). Mathematical models were developed to predict surface roughness and hardness generated by burnishing in terms of the above process parameters. A ball-type tool, designed and constructed from a high chrome steel material (HRC=63 and Ra=0.012 µm), was used for burnishing of fine-turned cylindrical bars (0.68-0.78µm and 145Hv). They are given by,

 

Ra= 0.305-0.005X1 - 0.0175X2 + 0.0525X4 + 0.0125X1X4 -0.02X2X4 - 0.0375X3X4

 

Hv=160.625 -2.37 5X1 + 5.125X2 + 1.875X3 + 4.375X4 - 1.625X1X4 + 4.375X2X4 - 2.375X3X4

 

High surface microhardness (175HV) was obtained at 400rpm, 2passes, 0.05mm/rev and 15kgf., and high surface finish (0.20µm) was achieved at 30kgf, 0.1mm/rev, 112rpm and single pass. In other words, surface finish improved by 350% and microhardness improved by 21% compared to as machined conditions.

Keywords: Ball burnishing, surface roughness, micro-hardness.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1088728

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2534

References:


[1] Loh, NH, Tam SC and Miyazawa, S. Investigating on the surface roughness produced by the ball Burnishing, Int. J Mach. Tools Manufact. Vol 31. No.1. pp.75-81, 1991.
[2] S. Rajesham, S and Tak, JC. A study on the surface characteristics of Burnished components, Journal of Mechanical Working Technology, 20 (1989) 129-138.
[3] Hassan, Shareef, A and Basharat Al. Influence of Burnishing process on surface roughness, hardness, and microstructure of some non-ferrous metals, wear 199 (1996) 1-8.
[4] Dabeer, PS and Purohit, GK. Effects of ball Burnishing parameters on surface roughness using surface roughness methodology, APEM journal, 5(2010) 2,111-116.
[5] Elaxir, MH. An investigation into roller Burnishing, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 40 (2000) 1603-1617.
[6] Fattouh, M, Elaxir, MH and Serage, SM. Investigating into the Burnishing of external cylindrical surfaces of 70/30 Cu-Zn alloy-, wear, 127 (1988) 123-137.
[7] Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS. Statistics for experimenters. John Wiley & Sons Inc. USA1978.
[8] Cochran, WG and Cox, GM. Experimental Design by second edition, john Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[9] Adler YP, Markov EV, Granovsky YV. The design of experiments to find optimal conditions. MIR, Moscow, 1975.