Curriculum Development of Successful Intelligence Promoting for Nursing Students

Authors: Saranya Chularee, Tawa Chularee

Abstract:

Successful intelligence (SI) is the integrated set of the ability needed to attain success in life, within individual-s sociocultural context. People are successfully intelligent by recognizing their strengths and weaknesses. They will find ways to strengthen their weakness and maintain their strength or even improve it. SI people can shape, select, and adapt to the environments by using balance of higher-ordered thinking abilities including; critical, creative, and applicative. Aims: The purposes of this study were to; 1) develop curriculum that promotes SI for nursing students, and 2) study the effectiveness of the curriculum development. Method: Research and Development was a method used for this study. The design was divided into two phases; 1) the curriculum development which composed of three steps (needs assessment, curriculum development and curriculum field trail), and 2) the curriculum implementation. In this phase, a pre-experimental research design (one group pretest-posttest design) was conducted. The sample composed of 49 sophomore nursing students of Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Surin, Thailand who enrolled in Nursing care of Health problem course I in 2011 academic year. Data were carefully collected using 4 instruments; 1) Modified essay questions test (MEQ) 2) Nursing Care Plan evaluation form 3) Group processing observation form (α = 0.74) and 4) Satisfied evaluation form of learning (α = 0.82). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results: The results revealed that the sample had post-test average score of SI higher than pre-test average score (mean difference was 5.03, S.D. = 2.84). Fifty seven percentages of the sample passed the MEQ posttest at the criteria of 60 percentages. Students demonstrated the strategies of how to develop nursing care plan. Overall, students- satisfaction on teaching performance was at high level (mean = 4.35, S.D. = 0.46). Conclusion: This curriculum can promote the attribute of characteristic of SI person and was highly required to be continued.

Keywords: Curriculum Development, Nursing Education, Successful Intelligence, Thinking ability.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1055739

References:

[1] Nursing Council. (1997). Nursing and Midwifery Profession Act (no. 2) 1997. Bangkok: Council of Nurses.
[2] Sinasonti, S. & Kirkkulthorn, T. (2000). Attitude and Nursing diagnosis ability of nursing student of Borommajonnani College of Nursing,Saraburi. Saraburi: Borommajonnani College of Nursing, Saraburi
[3] Chularee, S & Reangkamol, P. (2010). The Effect of Using the Body System Data Collection Form on Data Collection Ability for Nursing Care Plan of Nursing Students. Songklanagarind Journal of Nursing. 30(2): 29 - 38.
[4] Tadpinit, S. (2005). Development of an Instructional Model Enhancing Nursing Process Competency and Critical Thinking Skill. Doctoral degree of Education Thesis in Curriculum and Instruction, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University.
[5] Chularee, S. (2011). The needs assessment of developed the ability of Nursing care plan of nursing student. Khon Kaen, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University.
[6] Sternberg, R.J. & & Grigorenko, E.L. (2007). Teaching for Successful Intelligence. 2nd. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
[7] Sternberg, R.G.,& Grigorenko, E.L. (2004). Successful intelligence in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 43(4): 274 - 280.
[8] Leubulthawatchai, U. (2000). Critical Thinking: Nursing instructions. Bangkok: Thanapress and Graphic.
[9] Nursing council. (2011). Competency of Nursing Professional and Midwifery. Bangkok: Siriyod printing.
[10] Kemmis. S., & McTaggart, R. (1990). The Action Research Planner. Victoria: Deakin University press.
[11] Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1962.
[12] Praboromarajchanok institute Praboromarajchanok institute. (2009). Manual of utilization of Nursing curriculum 2009. Bangkok: Office of Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health
[13] Office of the National Education commission. (2002). The National of Education Act 1999 and revise 2002. Bangkok: PligWan Graphics Company.
[14] Udtranun, S. (1989). Basic and Principle of Curriculum. 3rd eds. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
[15] Phupan, S. (2003). Basic principle of Construction and Development of curriculum. Chang-Mai: The Knowledge Center
[16] Bridges, E.M., & Hallinger, P. (1992). Problem based learning for administrator. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. ERIC Document Reproductive Service No.ED 347617.
[17] Ball, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House. 83: 39 - 43.
[18] Po-yen, K. (2005). A Model for Developing systematic thinking to improve that language writing skill abilities for undergraduate students based on Triarchic theory and scaffolding approach. Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Psychology, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University.
[19] Saengchai, P. (2008). An Analysis of Interaction effects between problem-solving teaching method based on the Triarchic theory and problem-solving style on creative problem - solving ability and Mathematics learning achievement of ninth grade students. Thesis for the Degree of Master of Education Program in Education research, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University.
[20] Chansuwan, R. (2004.) Learning activities Development of learning environment for students for Mathayomsuksa 3 by using Cooperative learning in Sciences. Independent study for the Degree of Master of Education Program in Curriculum and Instruction, Graduate School, Mahasarakham University.
[21] Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Instructional goal Structure. Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213-240.
[22] Ge, X, & Land, S.M. (2003). Scaffolding Students Problem-Solving Processes in an ill-structured Task using Question Prompts and Peer Interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development 51(1): 21 - 38.