Fundamental Variables of Final Account Closing Success in Construction Projects in Malaysia
Project management process starts from the planning stage up to the stage of completion (handover of buildings, preparation of the final accounts and the closing balance). Seeing as this process is not easy to be implemented efficiently and effectively, the issue of unsuccessful delivery as per contract in construction has become a major problem for construction projects. These issues have been blamed mainly on inefficient traditional construction practices that continue to dominate the current industry. This is due to several factors, such as environments of construction technology, sophisticated design and customer demand, that are constantly changing and influencing, either directly or indirectly, to the practice of management. Among the identified influences are physical environment, social environment, information environment, political and moral atmosphere. Therefore, this paper is emerged to determine the fundamental variables in the final account closing success in construction project. This aim can be achieved via its objectives of identifying the key constraints to the closing of final accounts in construction projects in Malaysia, investigating solutions to the identified constraints and analysing the relative levels of impact of the identified constraints. It is expected that this paper provides effective measures to avoid or at least reduce the problems in final account closing to the optimum level. It is also anticipated that the finding or outcome reported in this paper could address the unsuccessful contributors in final account closing and define tools for their mitigation for the better development of construction project.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1088494Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3448
 Abd Shukor, A. S., Mohammad, M. F., Mahbub, R., and Ismail, F. (2011). Supply Chain Integration in Industrialized Building System in the Malaysian Construction Industry. The Built and Human Environment Review, 4(1), 108–121.
 Abdullah, M. R., Abdul Rahman, I., and Abdul Azis, A. A. (2010). Causes of delay in mara management procurement construction projects. Journal of Surveying, Construction and Property, 1(1), 123–138.
 Ashworth, A., and Hogg, K. (2002). Willis’s practice and procedure for the quantity surveyor (12th ed,.). Oxford , UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
 Barrie, D. S. (1984). Professional construction management (2nd ed.). New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
 Chan, A. P. C., Chan, D. W. M., and Ho, K. S. K. (2003). An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 21(5), 523–533.
 Chan, D., and Kumaraswamy, M. (1995). A study of the factors affecting construction durations in Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 13, 319–333.
 Chow, K. F. (1993). Law and Practice of Construction Contract Claims. Singapore: Longman.
 Chua, D., Kog, Y., and Loh, P. (1999). Critical success factors for different project objectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(May/June), 142–150.
 Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB). (2011). Construction Industry Master Plan (CIMP) 2006-2015. Malaysia.
 Crosthwaite, D. (2000). The global construction market: a crosssectional analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 619– 627.
 Egen, J. (1998). Rethinking Construction. London.
 Gidado, K. I. (1996). Project complexity: The focal point of construction production planning. Construction Management and Economics, 14(3), 213–225.
 Ibrahim, A. R. Bin, Roy, M. H., Ahmed, Z., and Imtiaz, G. (2010). An investigation of the status of the Malaysian construction industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(2), 294–308.
 Idrus, A., Sodangi, M., and Husin, M. (2011). Prioritizing Project Performance Criteria within Client Perspective. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 3(10), 1142–1151.
 Karna, S., and Jonnonen, H. (2005). Project feedback as a tool for learning. In International Group for Lean Construction-13. Sydney, Australia.
 Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the Team. London: HMSO.
 Lewis, W. A. (1956). Theory of economic growth (edition us.). Great Britain: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
 Love, P. E. D., Holt, G. D., Shen, L. Y., Li, H., and Irani, Z. (2002). Using systems dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems. International Journal of Project Management, 20(6), 425–436.
 Malayan Banking Berhad. (2011). Maybank Annual Report 2011. Kuala Lumpur.
 Munns, A., and Bjeirmi, B. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), 81–87.
 Naoum, S. (2003). An overview into the concept of partnering. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 71–76.
 Odeyinka, H., and Kaka, A. (2005). An Evaluation of Contractors’ Satisfaction with Payment Terms Influencing Construction Cash Flow. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 10(3), 171–180.
 Pheng, L. S. (1994). Balancing construction and marketing in world economic development: the four global scenarios. Journal of Construction Management and Economics, 12(2), 171–182.
 PWD. (2010). Buku panduan pentadbiran kontrak kerja raya. (Cawangan Kontrak and Ukur Bahan JKR, Ed.) (3rd Editio.). KualaLumpur.
 Rahman, M. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2002). Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting. Construction Management and Economics, 20(1), 45–54.
 Rosli, A. R. (1988). The Liability of Construction Project Manager and the Design Teams to the Clients and Buyers. University of Reading.
 Shen, L., Hao, J. L., Tam, V., and Yao, H. (2007). A checklist for assessing sustainability performance of construction projects. Journal of civil engineering and management, XIII(4), 273–281.
 Strischek, D. (1995). Cash Flow Projections for Contractors Revisited. Journal of Commercial Lending, 77(10), 17–37.
 Tse, R. Y. C., and Ganesan, S. (1997). Causal relationship between construction flows and GDP: evidence from Hong Kong. Construction Management and Economics, 15(4), 371–376.
 Vrijhoef, R., and Koskela, L. (2000). The four roles of supply chain management in construction. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6(3-4), 169–178.
 Wood, A. A. B., Wainwright, and Howard, W. (1963). Variation and final account procedure. London: Hutchinson Technical Education.
 Zakaria, Z., Ismail, S., and Md.Yusof, A. (2012a). Cause and Impact of Dispute and Delay the Closing of Final Account in Malaysia Construction Industry. The Journal of Southeast Asian Research, 2012, 1–12.
 Zakaria, Z., Ismail, S., and Md.Yusof, I. (2012b). The Closing of Final Account in Malaysia Construction IndustryV: An Overview on the Cause and Impact of Dispute and Delay. 19th IBIMA, Barcelona, Spain, 12-13 November 2012 (pp. 1355–1367). Kuala Lumpur: IBIMA Publisher.
 Zakaria, Z., Ismail, S., and Md.Yusof, A. (2013). Effectiveness of Pavement Management System and its Effects to the Closing of Final Account in Construction Project in Malaysia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 423, 012034.
 Zakaria, Z., Ismail, S., and Md. Yusof, A. (2014). Modelling the Determinants Influencing the Need of Computer Simulation Framework in Improving the Closing of Final Account in Construction Projects. Advanced Science Letters, 20(1), 321–325.