Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30076
Evaluation of Energy and Environmental Aspects of Reduced Tillage Systems Applied in Maize Cultivation

Authors: E. Sarauskis, L. Masilionyte, Z. Kriauciuniene, K. Romaneckas, S. Buragiene

Abstract:

In maize growing technologies, tillage technological operations are the most time-consuming and require the greatest fuel input. Substitution of conventional tillage, involving deep ploughing, by other reduced tillage methods can reduce technological production costs, diminish soil degradation and environmental pollution from greenhouse gas emissions, as well as improve economic competitiveness of agricultural produce.

Experiments designed to assess energy and environmental aspects associated with different reduced tillage systems, applied in maize cultivation were conducted at Aleksandras Stulginskis University taking into account Lithuania’s economic and climate conditions. The study involved 5 tillage treatments: deep ploughing (DP, control), shallow ploughing (SP), deep cultivation (DC), shallow cultivation (SC) and no-tillage (NT).

Our experimental evidence suggests that with the application of reduced tillage systems it is feasible to reduce fuel consumption by 13-58% and working time input by 8.4% to nearly 3-fold, to reduce the cost price of maize cultivation technological operations, decrease environmental pollution with CO2 gas by 30 to 146 kg ha-1, compared with the deep ploughing.

Keywords: Reduced tillage, energy and environmental assessment, fuel consumption, CO2 emission, maize.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1088304

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1747

References:


[1] Ang B.W., Mu A.R., Zhou P. Accounting frameworks for tracking energy efficiency trends Energy Economics, 2010. 32. pp. 1209-1219.
[2] Castoldi, N., Bechini, L. Integrated sustainability assessment of cropping systems with agro-ecological and economic indicators in northern Italy. European journal of agronomy, 2010. 32 (1), 59-72.
[3] Fathollahzadeh, H., Mobli, H., Rajabipour, A., Minaee, S., Jafari, A., & Tabatabaie, S. M. H. Average and instantaneous fuel consumption of Iranian conventional tractor with moldboard plow in tillage. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2010. 5 (2), 30.
[4] Mechanizuotų žemės ūkio paslaugų įkainiai (http://www.laei.lt/ index.php?mt=leidiniai&straipsnis=432&metai=2012) D. 1, Pagrindinio žemės dirbimo darbai / (parengė: I. Kriščiukaitienė, I. Srebutėnienė, V. Malūnavičienė). Vilnius: Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics, 2013. 107 p. ISSN 2029-2260 (in Lithuanian).
[5] Mileusnić, Z. I., Petrović, D. V., Đević, M. S. Comparison of tillage systems according to fuel consumption. Energy, 2010. 35 (1), 221-228.
[6] Omer A.M. Energy, environment and sustainable development Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008.12 (9), pp. 2265- 2300.
[7] Sarauskis E., Buragiene S., Romaneckas K., Sakalauskas A., Jasinskas A., Vaiciukevicius E., Karayel D. Working time, fuel consumption and economic analysis of different tillage and sowing systems in Lithuania. Engineering for Rural Development. 2012. Vol. 11, p.52-59.
[8] Sarauskis E., Vaiciukevicius E., Romaneckas K., Sakalauskas A., Baranauskaite R. Economic and energetic evaluation of sustainable tillage and cereal sowing technologies in Lithuania. Rural Development. 2009. Vol. 4, Book 1, p. 280-285.
[9] Tebrügge F. No-tillage visions – protection of soil, water and climate and influence on management and farm income. In: Garcia-Torres, L.; Benites, J.; Martínez-Vilela, A. (eds.) Conservation Agriculture - A Worldwide Challenge. 2001. p. 303-316.
[10] Tarakanovas P., Raudonius S. The program package “Selekcija” for processing statistical data. Akademija, Kedainiai, 2003. pp. 56 (in Lithuanian).
[11] Tolon-Becerra A., Lastra-Bravo X., Botta G.F. Methodological proposal for territorial distribution of the percentage reduction in gross inland energy consumption according to the EU energy policy strategic goal Energy Policy, 2010. 38 (11), pp. 7093–7105 Worldwide Challenge. p. 161-170.