Remote Sensing, GIS, and AHP for Assessing Physical Vulnerability to Tsunami Hazard
Authors: Abu Bakar Sambah, Fusanori Miura
Abstract:
Remote sensing image processing, spatial data analysis through GIS approach, and analytical hierarchy process were introduced in this study for assessing the vulnerability area and inundation area due to tsunami hazard in the area of Rikuzentakata, Iwate Prefecture, Japan. Appropriate input parameters were derived from GSI DEM data, ALOS AVNIR-2, and field data. We used the parameters of elevation, slope, shoreline distance, and vegetation density. Five classes of vulnerability were defined and weighted via pairwise comparison matrix. The assessment results described that 14.35km2 of the study area was under tsunami vulnerability zone. Inundation areas are those of high and slightly high vulnerability. The farthest area reached by a tsunami was about 7.50km from the shoreline and shows that rivers act as flooding strips that transport tsunami waves into the hinterland. This study can be used for determining a priority for land-use planning in the scope of tsunami hazard risk management.
Keywords: AHP, GIS, remote sensing, tsunami vulnerability.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1088274
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 3338References:
[1] M. Pelling, The vulnerability of Cities: Natural Disasters and Social Resilience, Earthscan Publication, London, 2003.
[2] C. Bollin, C. Cardenas, H. Hahn, and K. S. Vasta, Disaster Risk Management by Communities and Local Governments, Inter-American Development Bank, Washinton DC, 2003.
[3] Karen E. Joyce, Kim C. Wright, Sergey V. Samsonov and Vincent G. Ambrosia, Remote Sensing and The Disaster Management Cycle, Advances in Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Gary Jedlovec (Ed.), ISBN:978-953-307-005-6, InTech Published, 2009.
[4] F. Yamazaki, Y. Yano, and M. Matsuoka, “Visual damage interpretation of buildings in Bam city using Quickbird images following the 2003 Bam, Iran earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 21, no. S1, pp. S329−S336, 2005.
[5] F. Yamazaki and M. Matsuoka, “Remote sensing technology in postdisaster damage assessment,” Journal of Earthquakes and Tsunamis, World Scientific Publishing Company, vol. 1, no. 3, 2007, pp. 193−210.
[6] S. J. Carver, “Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems,” International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 321−339, 1991.
[7] P. Jankowski, “Integrating geographic information systems and multiple criteria decision making methods,” International Journal of Geographic Information System, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 251−273, 1995.
[8] S. Eckert, R. Jelinek, G. Zeug, and E. Krausmann, “Remote sensingbased assessment of tsunami vulnerability and risk in Alexandria, Egypt,” Applied Geography, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 714−723, 2012.
[9] R. S. Mahendra, P. C. Mohanty, H. Bisoyi, T. S. Kumar, and S. Nayak, “Assessment and management of coastal multi-hazard vulnerability along the Cuddalore Villupuram, east coast of India using geospatial techniques,” Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 302−311, 2011.
[10] T. P. Sinaga, N. Adhi, Yang-Won Lee, and S. Yongcheol, “GIS mapping of tsunami vulnerability: case study of the Jembrana Regency in Bali, Indonesia,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 537−543, 2011.
[11] F. Usman and K. Murakami, “Preliminary evaluation for strategy on coastal vegetation belt againt tsunami hazard in Pacitan, Indonesia,” European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 530−542, 2011.
[12] G. Strunz, J. Post, K. Zosseder, S. Wegscheider, M. Muck, T. Riedlinger, H. Mehl, S. Dech, J. Birkmann, N. Gebert, H. Harjono, H. Z. Anwar, Sumaryono, R. M. Khomarudin, and A. Muhari, “Tsunami risk assessment in Indonesia,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, vol. 11, pp. 67−82, 2011.
[13] M. Papathoma and D. Dominey-Howes, “Tsunami vulnerability assessment and its implications for coastal hazard analysis and disaster management planning, Gulf of Corinth, Greece,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 733−747, 2003.
[14] F. Yamazaki, K. Kouchi, and M. Matsuoka, “Tsunami damage detection using moderate-resolutuion satellite imagery,” Proceeding of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, California, US, 2006.
[15] M. Papathoma, D. Dominey-Howes, Y. Zong, and D. Smith, “Assessing tsunami vulnerability, an example from Herakleio, Crete,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 377−389, 2013.
[16] F. Dall'Osso, M. Gonella, G. Gabbianelli, G. Withycombe, and D. Dominey-Howes, “A revised (PTVA) model for assessing the vulnerability of buildings to tsunami damage,” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 1557−1565, doi:10.5194/nhess-9-1557-2009, 2009.
[17] F. Dall’Osso, L. Bovio, A. Cavalletti, F. Immordino, M. Gonella, and G. Gabbianelli, “A novel approach (the CRATER method) for assessing tsunamivulnerability at the regional scale using ASTER imagery,” Italian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 55−74, 2010.
[18] B. Horn, “Hill shading and the reflectance map,” Proceedings of IEEE, vol. 69, no. 1, 1981, pp. 14−47.
[19] K. Iida, “Magnitude, energy and generation mechanisms of tsunamis and a catalogue of earthquakes associated with tsunamis,” Proceeding of Tsunami Meeting at the 10th Pacific Science Congress, 1963, pp. 7−18.
[20] R. A. Van Zuidam, Guide to Geomorphologic−Aerial Photographic Interpretation and Mapping, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1983.
[21] A. R. Huete, “A Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI),” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 25, no.3, pp. 295−309, 1988.
[22] L. S. Araujo, Joao Roberto dos Santos, Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro, “Relationship between SAVI and biomass data of forest and savanna contact zone and the Brazilian Amazonia,” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. XXXIII, part B7, Amsterdam, 2000.
[23] M. Bouvet, G. Chander, P. Goryl P, R. Santer, Saunier, “Preliminary radiometric calibration assessment of ALOS AVNIR-2,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE International, pp. 2673−2676, 23−28 July 2007.
[24] A. K. Sah, B. P. Sah, K. Honji, N. Kubo, S. Senthil, “Semi-automated cloud/shadow removal and land cover change detection using satellite imagery,” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XXXIX-B7, XXII ISPRS Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 25 August–01 September 2012, pp. 335−340.
[25] M. C. Hanse, R. S. Defries, J. R. G. Townshend, R. Sohlberg, “Global land cover classification at 1km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach,” International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 21, pp. 1331−1364, 2000.
[26] P. Gong P, R. Pu, G. S. Biging, M. R. Larrieu, “Estimation of forest Leaf area index using vegetation indices derived from hyperion Hyperspectral data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 41, no. 6, 2003.
[27] A. R. Huete, “A Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI),” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 25, 295−309, 1988.
[28] J. R. Jensen, Remote Sensing of the Environmental Earth Resources Perspective, Prentice Hall, New Jersey-USA, 2000.
[29] J. Qi, A. Chehbouni, A. R. Huete, Y. H. Kerr, and S. Sorooshian, “A Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 48, pp. 119−126, 1994.
[30] T. L. Saaty, “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 15, pp. 234−281, 1977.
[31] T. L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process, planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980, pp. 287.
[32] T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the AHP; why is the principle eigenvector necessary,” Eur J Oper Res, vol. 145, 85–91, 2003.
[33] A. M. Youssef, B. Pradhan, E. Tarabees, “Integrated evaluation of urban development suitability based on remote sensing and GIS techniques: contribution from the analytic hierarchy process,” Arab J Geosci, vol. 4, pp. 463–473, 2010.
[34] T.L Saaty, “Decision making for leaders: The analytical hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world,” The Analytical Hierarchy Process Series, vol. 2, pp. 71−74, 1996.
[35] E. H. Forman, M. A. Selly, Decision by Objectives, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2001.
[36] J. R. Eastman, W. Jin, P. A. K. Kyem, J. Toledano, “Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions,” Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 539–547, 1995.
[37] Geospatial Authority of Japan (GSI), Map of inundation area due to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Map number 61, 62, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 71, available at www.gsi.go.jp/kikaku/kikaku40016.html., Accessed on 25 June 2013.