Profile Calculation in Water Phantom of Symmetric and Asymmetric Photon Beam

Authors: N. Chegeni, M. J. Tahmasebi Birgani

Abstract:

Nowadays, in most radiotherapy departments, the commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) used to calculate dose distributions needs to be verified; therefore, quick, easy-to-use and low cost dose distribution algorithms are desirable to test and verify the performance of the TPS. In this paper, we put forth an analytical method to calculate the phantom scatter contribution and depth dose on the central axis based on the equivalent square concept. Then, this method was generalized to calculate the profiles at any depth and for several field shapes regular or irregular fields under symmetry and asymmetry photon beam conditions. Varian 2100 C/D and Siemens Primus Plus Linacs with 6 and 18 MV photon beam were used for irradiations. Percentage depth doses (PDDs) were measured for a large number of square fields for both energies, and for 45^º wedges which were employed to obtain the profiles in any depth. To assess the accuracy of the calculated profiles, several profile measurements were carried out for some treatment fields. The calculated and measured profiles were compared by gamma-index calculation. All γ–index calculations were based on a 3% dose criterion and a 3 mm dose-to-agreement (DTA) acceptance criterion. The γ values were less than 1 at most points. However, the maximum γ observed was about 1.10 in the penumbra region in most fields and in the central area for the asymmetric fields. This analytical approach provides a generally quick and fairly accurate algorithm to calculate dose distribution for some treatment fields in conventional radiotherapy.

Keywords: Dose distribution, equivalent field, asymmetric field, irregular field.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1087818

References:

[1] Storchi PR, van Battum LJ, Woudstra E. Calculation of a pencil beam kernel from measured photon beam data. Phys Med Biol. 1999 Dec;44(12):2917-28.
[2] Nyholm T, Olofsson J, Ahnesjo A, Karlsson M. Photon pencil kernel parameterisation based on beam quality index. RadiotherOncol. 2006 Mar;78(3):347-51.
[3] Ahnesjo A, Aspradakis MM. Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 1999 Nov;44(11):R99-155.
[4] Day MJ, Aird EG. The equivalent field method for dose determinations in rectangular fields. BJR Suppl. 1996;25:138-51.
[5] Sterling T, Perry H, Weinkam J. Automation of radiation treatment planning. VI. A general field equation to calculate percent depth dose in the irradiated volume of a cobalt 60 beam. Br J Radiol. 1967 Jun;40(474):463-74.
[6] Kornelsen RO, Young ME. Empirical equations for the representation of depth dose data for computerized treatment planning. Br J Radiol. 1975 Sep;48(573):739-48.
[7] Pal S, Ravishankar R, Sharma RP, Muthukrishnan G, Ray DK, Roy SN, et al. Empirical formula for the prediction of off axis ratios and isodose curves for a treatment planning system. J Med Phys. 2006 Oct;31(4):262-8.
[8] El-Attar AL, Abdel-Wanees ME, Hashem MA. Dose Measurement and Calculation of Asymmetric X-Ray Fields from Therapeutic Linac Tenth Radiation Physics & Protection Conference 2010 27-30 November; Nasr City - Cairo, Egypt 2010.
[9] Millin AE, Smith CW. A beam profile generation algorithm for wedged half-beam blocked asymmetric fields. Phys Med Biol. 1994 Jan;39(1):63-73.
[10] Thomas SJ, Thomas RL. A beam generation algorithm for linear accelerators with independent collimators. Phys Med Biol. 1990;35(3):8.
[11] Tsalafoutas IA, Xenofos S, Papalexopoulos A, Nikoletopoulos S. Dose calculations for asymmetric fields defined by independent collimators using symmetric field data. Br J Radiol. 2000 Apr;73(868):403-9.
[12] Kwa W, Kornelsen RO, Harrison RW, el-Khatib E. Dosimetry for asymmetric x-ray fields. Med Phys. 1994 Oct;21(10):1599-604.
[13] TahmasebiBirgani MJ, Karbalaee SM. Calculation of Analytical Expressions for Measured Percentage Depth Dose Data in Megavoltage Photon Therapy. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 2009;11(2):140- 4.
[14] Pal S, Muthukrishnan G, Ravishankar R, Sharma RP, Ghose AM. Estimation of percentage depth dose distributions for therapeutic machines. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2002;65(6):589-94.
[15] TahmasebiBirgani MJ, Behrooz MA, Shams A. Determination of the attenuation coefficient for megavoltage photons in the water phantom. Iranian journal of radiation research (IJRR). 2012;9(4):251-5.
[16] Podgoršak EB. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. International Atomic Energy Agency; 2005.
[17] Fippel M, Haryanto F, Dohm O, Nusslin F, Kriesen S. A virtual photon energy fluence model for Monte Carlo dose calculation. Med Phys. 2003 Mar;30(3):301-11.
[18] Harms WB, Sr., Low DA, Wong JW, Purdy JA. A software tool for the quantitative evaluation of 3D dose calculation algorithms. Med Phys. 1998 Oct;25(10):1830-6.
[19] Van Dyk J, Barnett RB, Cygler JE, Shragge PC. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers. Int J RadiatOncolBiol Phys. 1993 May 20;26(2):261-73.
[20] Low DA, Dempsey JF. Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. Med Phys. 2003 Sep;30(9):2455-64.
[21] Bak J, Choi JH, Kim JS, Park SW. Modified dose difference method for comparing dose distributions. . JOURN AL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS. 2012;13(2):73-80.
[22] Clasie BM, Sharp GC, Seco J, Flanz JB, Kooy HM. Numerical solutions of the gamma-index in two and three dimensions. Phys Med Biol. 2012 Nov 7;57(21):6981-97.
[23] Kornelsen RO, Batho HF. Negative pi-mesons from TRIUMF for radiobiology and radiotherapy. II. Biological and medical aspects. Rev LatinoamMicrobiolParasitol (Mex). 1968 Apr-Jun;10(2):206-7.